Canadian governmental study group favors allowing foriegn ownership of domestic companies

by Stefan Fobes

It is one thing after a damn other. When I first heard of Bilderberg I admit, I didn’t really much give attention to it. But just on the ground examining the world for myself post-conference, I’m like holy crap! It’s like they are training a gigantic policy Uzi on the world and just firing off all the ammo they can get their hands on.

While Mexico’s economy smolders, and America’s teeters, Canada has had at least some sort of economic stability, even though two of its major mining companies got bought up by Swiss and Brazilian firms in 2006. A topic by Bilderberg that was discussed, which is admitted in the press release that they put out, was protectionism. Translation: Any barriers to letting foriegn interests run roughshod over domestic businesses.

The Canadian press reported the other day that the Competition Policy Review Panel, a study group appointed by Canadian PM Harper, has submitted in their Competing to Win report these policy recommendations:

A federal government panel is calling for an “Open Skies” airline policy to help consumers as part of a massive overhaul of restrictions on foreign investment in Canadian industries.

The five-person study group is also urging that barriers to foreign investment be torn down, with the exception of the cultural sector, and that bank mergers be permitted – all in the name of creating a stronger, more competitive economy for the future.

Loosening government control of the domestic aviation industry would improve competition among airlines and benefit consumers and business travellers, according to “Compete to Win,” the report released yesterday.

The panel commissioned by the Harper government said Ottawa should raise the limit on foreign ownership of Canadian airlines to 49 per cent from 25 per cent and move quickly to expand landing rights in Europe through an “Open Skies” agreement with the European Union.

Some more of their recommendations, straight from the horse’s mouth:

• Introduce greater liberalization of investment restrictions in regulated sectors in order to increase Canada’s competitiveness by:
• Reviewing air transport, uranium mining, telecommunications and broadcasting, and financial services regimes every five years;
• Allowing up to 49 percent foreign ownership of air carriers on a reciprocal basis;
• Liberalizing foreign ownership restrictions in uranium mining, subject to a new national security regime, and obtaining greater rights to develop nuclear resources or process uranium;
• Allowing foreign firms to establish or acquire Canadian telecom companies with less than a 10% market share, and, following a review of broadcasting and cultural policies, further liberalizing investment restrictions in the telecom and broadcasting sectors;

• Retaining the financial services sector’s “widely held” rule, while removing the de facto prohibition on mergers of large financial institutions, subject to regulatory safeguards.

And the corporate predators are just loving it. Mostly.

“This is sweet music to our ears,” said Thomas D’Aquino, president of the Canadian Council of Chief Executives. “It’s comprehensive, it’s deep, it’s far reaching. It really is a phenomenal blueprint for taking Canada into the 21st century.”

But others were not so impressed.

“It’s not really logical,” said Jim Shaw, CEO of Shaw Communications Inc., referring to proposals to gradually increase foreign ownership of telecommunications companies. “We’d like to see the ownership rules lifted entirely. Then anybody who wants to compete in Canada has to compete.”

Maybe this is just a coincidence that they came out with it now, but Lynton Wilson, the chair of the study group, was a previous Bilderberg attendee and another panel member, N. Murray Edwards, was at this year’s bash in Virginia just two weeks ago.

This here is total prep for the world government system where everything is being put in place, where everything is under central control by the few at the miserable expense of the great masses. I played a game when I was much younger called Killer Instinct, where there was one corporation that made everything. Video games and movies are used by the Illuminati to gradually ease us over to a point where we’ll wake up in the morning and a whole new world will be here and we’ll wonder, as we get our microchip scanned at the market, how we ever got there. I cover just this subject in Wall-E, coming to a battlefield near you.

Implementation of these plans will turn Canada into another Mexico where the transnational corporations come in, pay Canadians garbage salaries and wages, and use the cops as their security forces. Roger Bybee and Carolyn Winter throw the light on this rarely touched upon topic:

* NAFTA’s service-sector rules allowed big firms like Wal-Mart to enter the Mexican market and, selling low-priced goods made by ultra-cheap labor in China, to displace locally-based shoe, toy, and candy firms. An estimated 28,000 small and medium-sized Mexican businesses have been eliminated.

This is what happened after that:

With US firms unwilling to pay even minimal taxes, NAFTA has hardly produced the promised uplift in the lives of Mexicans. Ciudad Juarez Mayor Gustavo Elizondo, whose city is crammed with US-owned low-wage plants, expressed it plainly: “We have no way to provide water, sewage, and sanitation workers. Every year, we get poorer and poorer even though we create more and more wealth.”

That’s why Mexicans are pouring into America like a blizzard. That’s what’s in store for Canada if that foot gets lodged in the door.

European member of parliament proposes EU blogger registry

Firestorm in Swedish media over ‘EU blogger registry’

June 27, 2008

Teresa Kuchler & Leigh Phillips/EUobserver

Swedish media have erroneously reported that the EU plans to register and bill all bloggers, setting off a firestorm of reaction in the country.

Politicians of all political stripes and most major media outlets have since furiously attacked the idea as another example of Big Brother snooping into people’s daily lives, while the MEP at the heart of the controversy has been compared to Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceausescu.

The papers later specified that the proposal had originated in a month-old report on media pluralism from the parliament – a document that has little legal weight – and intended to clarify the legal situation of bloggers, but by then the debate in the press had already reached a fevered pitch.
“Exchange the EU for China, and you would have a real media outcry,” wrote Sören Karlsson, publisher of the daily Helsingborgs Dagblad and himself an eager blogger, who damned the ‘blogger registry’ as a threat to freedom of speech.

“We would have found it insane.”

Sven-Åke Olofsson, political editor of daily Helsingborgs Dagblad, and also a blogger, wrote in his paper: “Here they try to introduce laws and regulations in an area that is not possible to regulate.

“It seems useless and proves an authoritarian attitude towards freedom of speech.”

The Estonian MEP who drafted the media pluralism report, socialist deputy Marianne Mikko, has been the target of much of the criticism.

“In Ceausescu’s Romania, everybody who owned a type writer had to hand in a paper with typing samples, so that the authorities more easily could fight enemies of the state and ordinary criminals,” recalled Peter Swedenmark, an editorial writer for daily Västerbottens Folkblad.

“Unfortunately, in the naive proposal from Mikko, there seem to be some kinship with the Romanian line,” he continued.

A conservative MEP also used the opportunity to attack the registry. Christopher Fjellner, from the centre-righ EPP-ED grouping in the parliament said to the newspaper Svenska Dagbladet: “The report shows proof of immense ignorance among our decision makers. It is such an incredibly stupid proposal,” he said, adding that Ms Mikko’s education as a journalist under the former Soviet Union must have given her an old-fashioned perspective on the media landscape.

“She has a hole in her head,” he concluded.

The media storm reached such a frenzy that the European parliament’s Swedish press sector on Thursday afternoon was forced to send out a press release to all Swedish media, explaining that MEPs’ own-initiative reports such as that of Ms Mikko had next to no legal weight.

The bureau also underlined that the parliament does not have the right to initiate legislation, something that can only be proposed by the European Commission.

The main recommendations in the report call on the European Commission and EU member states to apply competition law to the media to ensure media pluralism.

Its other major recommendations include the creation of media pluralism ombudspersons in the member states; the development of European core curriculum for media literacy; and for the commission to ensure that regulations governing state aid not be used to undermine public service media.

The report does however also call for a clarification of the legal status of webblog authors and wants to see a disclosure of interests, and the voluntary labelling of webblogs.

The MEPs that approved the report were concerned that the legal situation of bloggers regarding source protection was unclear and that laws in Europe did not cover where liability was assigned in the event of lawsuits.

Speaking to the EUobserver, Ms Mikko clarified her intentions: “We do not need to know the exact identity of bloggers. We need some credentials, a quality mark, a certain disclosure of who is writing and why. We need this to be able to trust and rely on the source.”

“The Economist is a valuable brand, its articles are trusted by readers without contributors having to reveal their names,” she said. “If there is a way to validate the best bloggers the same way that publishing in the Economist validates its writers, it should be done.”

“It is clear that a Harvard professor of international relations is likely to treat, for instance, the Middle East peace process or European integration in an educated and balanced manner,” she added. “The same trust cannot be put in a radical high school student from Gaza or a Eurosceptic who has never been out of his village”

“The reader should know why this or that blogger should be trusted on a particular issue.”

The outrage has been exacerbated by the timing of the debate. The country is currently involved in heated discussion about surveillance in society after a controversial law on tapping e-mails was recently passed by the Swedish parliament.

Last week, the government narrowly passed legislation that gives officials the power to open all emails and listen to any telephone conversation in the country.

US-based search engine firm Google’s global privacy counsel, Peter Fleischer said of the bill: “By introducing these new measures, the Swedish government is following the examples set by governments ranging from China and Saudi Arabia to the US government’s widely criticised eavesdropping programme.”

The bill provoked widespread opposition, with protesters handing out copies of George Orwell’s 1984. Much of the reaction against the Mikko report in Sweden has compared her proposals to the government surveillance legislation.

US and EU near agreement to swap data on each other’s citizens

U.S. and Europe Near Agreement on Private Data

June 28, 2008

Charlie Savage/New York Times

US-EU relations were another stated topic on the Bilderberg announcement.

WASHINGTON – The United States and the European Union are nearing completion of an agreement allowing law enforcement and security agencies to obtain private information – like credit card transactions, travel histories and Internet browsing habits – about people on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean.

The potential agreement, as outlined in an internal report obtained by The New York Times, would represent a diplomatic breakthrough for American counterterrorism officials, who have clashed with the European Union over demands for personal data. Europe generally has more stringent laws restricting how governments and businesses can collect and transfer such information.

Negotiators, who have been meeting since February 2007, have largely agreed on draft language for 12 major issues central to a “binding international agreement,” the report said. The pact would make clear that it is lawful for European governments and companies to transfer personal information to the United States, and vice versa.

But the two sides are still at odds on several other matters, including whether European citizens should be able to sue the United States government over its handling of their personal data, the report said.

The report, which lays out the progress of the talks and lists the completed draft language, was jointly written by the negotiators from the United States Homeland Security, Justice and State Departments, and by their European Union counterparts. The talks grew out of two conflicts over information-sharing after the September 2001 terrorist attacks. The United States government demanded access to customer data held by airlines flying out of Europe and by a consortium, known as Swift, which tracks global bank transfers.

American investigators wanted the data so they could look for suspicious activity. But several European countries objected, citing violations of their privacy laws. Each dispute frayed diplomatic relations and required difficult negotiations to resolve.

American and European Union officials are trying to head off future confrontations “by finding common ground on privacy and by agreeing not to impose conflicting obligations on private companies,” said Stewart A. Baker, the assistant secretary for policy at the Department of Homeland Security, who is involved in the talks. “Globalization means that more and more companies are going to get caught between U.S. and European law,” he said.

Paul M. Schwartz, a law professor at the University of California, Berkeley, said such a blanket agreement could transform international privacy law by eliminating a problem that has led to negotiations of “staggering” complexity between Europe and the United States.

“The reason it’s a big deal is that it is going to lower the whole transaction cost for the U.S. government to get information from Europe,” Mr. Schwartz said. “Most of the negotiations will already be completed. They will just be able to say, ‘Look, we provide adequate protection, so you’re required to turn it over.’ “

But the prospect that the agreement might lower barriers to sending personal information to the United States government has alarmed some privacy rights advocates in Europe. While some praised the principles laid out in the draft text, they warned that it was difficult to tell whether the agreement would allow broad exceptions to such limits.

For example, the two sides have agreed that information that reveals race, religion, political opinion, health or “sexual life” may not be used by a government “unless domestic law provides appropriate safeguards.” But the accord does not spell out what would be considered an appropriate safeguard, suggesting that each government may decide for itself whether it is complying with the rule.

“I am very worried that once this will be adopted, it will serve as a pretext to freely share our personal data with anyone, so I want it to be very clear about exactly what it means and how it will work,” said Sophia in ‘t Veld, a member of the European Parliament from the Netherlands who has been an outspoken advocate of privacy rights.

The Bush administration and the European Commission have not publicized their talks, but they referred to their progress in a little-noticed paragraph deep in a joint statement after a summit meeting between President Bush and European leaders in Slovenia this month.

Issued June 10, the statement declared that “the fight against transnational crime and terrorism requires the ability to share personal data for law enforcement,” and called for the creation of a “binding international agreement” to aid such transfers while also ensuring that citizens’ privacy is “fully” protected.
The negotiators are trying to agree on minimum standards to protect privacy rights, such as limiting access to the information to “authorized individuals with an identified purpose” for looking at it. If a government’s policies are “effective” in meeting all standards, any transfer of personal data to that government would be presumed lawful.

For example, European law sets up independent government agencies to police whether personal data is being used lawfully and to help citizens who are concerned about invasions of their privacy. The United States has no such independent agency. But in a concession, the Europeans have agreed that the American government’s internal oversight system may be good enough to provide accountability for how Europeans’ data is used.

About a half-dozen issues remain unresolved, the report said. One sticking point is what rights European citizens will have if the United States government violates data privacy rules or takes an adverse action against them – like denying them entry into the country or placing them on a no-fly list – based on incorrect personal information.

European law generally allows people who think the government has mishandled their personal information to file a lawsuit to seek damages and to have the data corrected or expunged. American citizens and permanent residents can generally do the same under the Privacy Act of 1974, but that statute does not extend to foreigners.

The Bush administration is trying to persuade the Europeans that other options for correcting problems are satisfactory, including asking an agency to correct any misinformation through administrative procedures. For now, the European Union is holding to the position that its citizens “require the ability to bring suit in U.S. courts specifically under the Privacy Act for an agreement to be reached on redress,” the report said.

But the Bush administration does not want to make such a concession, in part because it would require new legislation. The administration is trying to achieve an agreement that would not require Congressional action, Mr. Baker said.

David Sobel, a senior counsel with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit organization dedicated to data-privacy rights, said the administration’s depiction of the process of correcting mishandled data through agency procedures sounds “very rosy,” but the reality is that it is often impossible, even for American citizens, to win such a fight.

Officials said it remains unclear when the agreement can be completed. But there are several pressures encouraging negotiators to sprint to the finish.

Bush administration officials say they would like to resolve the problem before they leave office next January. If the agreement does not require legislative action, Mr. Bush could complete it with a signature.

European officials may have an easier time securing its approval now, before the European Union completes proposed changes. Member nations now ratify such accords, but the changes would hand ratification power to the European Parliament, which has been skeptical of American antiterrorism policies. The report says Europeans intended to wait until 2009 after the planned completion of the reforms to finish it. But the changes are now facing likely delay after Irish voters rejected them in a referendum this month.

In addition, businesses that operate on both sides of the Atlantic are pushing to make sure they are not caught between conflicting legal obligations.

“This will require compromise,” said Peter Fleischer, the global privacy counsel for Google. “It will require people to agree on a framework that balances two conflicting issues: privacy and security. But the need to develop that kind of framework is becoming more important as more data moves onto the Internet and circles across the global architecture.”

Bilderberg strikes again: Hackers, the Net, blondes, and the European war on freedom

by Stefan Fobes

Earlier this week, in my analysis of Bilderberg 2008 and what it held for the world this year, I pondered on whether there would be Al-CIAda hackers let loose, as cyberterrorism was being discussed this time. And yesterday, some hackers messed around and made the official sites of the organizations overseeing the web’s key routing infrastructure and domain name regulation systems point to a site displaying this message: “You think that you control the domains but you don’t! Everybody knows wrong. We control the domains including ICANN! Don’t you believe us?”

Did a ten year old write that? Oh…oh….uh….you buh…believe us don’t you? This is exactly like the 9/11 “cellphone” call from Flight 93 where someone called passenger Mark Bingham’s mother and said, hi this is Mark Bingham, and then when asked by Bingham’s mother who the guys were that they said had a bomb on the plane, they asked, You believe me, don’t you? Voice cloning technology has long ago been perfected by governments. Here’s a bit from the Washington Post:

“Gentlemen! We have called you together to inform you that we are going to overthrow the United States government.” So begins a statement being delivered by Gen. Carl W. Steiner, former Commander-in-chief, U.S. Special Operations Command.

At least the voice sounds amazingly like him.

But it is not Steiner. It is the result of voice “morphing” technology developed at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico.

By taking just a 10-minute digital recording of Steiner’s voice, scientist George Papcun is able, in near real time, to clone speech patterns and develop an accurate facsimile. Steiner was so impressed, he asked for a copy of the tape.

Continues with some stuff about psyops, which is exactly what, among other things, 9/11 and this “hacker attack” was. Whoever did it claimed to be the NetDevilz and said they were Turkish. Please! Any hacker good enough to hit these critical websites would know that the NSA and other government agencies have the capability to trace their location in under an hour, and be at their door in six more hours at best. There were two high school kids in New York who emailed Homeland Security last year as a prank and death threated Bush, and in just four hours Secret Service agents swooped in and arrested them. That’s the reality of things. Corporate websites and the CIA and FBI’s sites have been hit and defaced many times over the years and the people who did it never have revealed anything personal like country of origin, most times not even the name of the crew that they run with. It’s like I’m watching some fake Hollywood movie where some 13 year old on his mom’s laptop takes down the whole government. They treat us like total idiots and it has to stop.

Bilderberg, two weeks ago, where all the top people in business, newspapers, finance, banking, heads of state, and world royalty met in secret to discuss stuff about cyberterrorism, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Africa, a nuclear free world, and, according to Bilderberg exposer Jim Tucker, blonde haired blue eyed terrorism. And over the week, reports of White European Al-Qaeda training in Pakistan, North Korea out of nowhere agreeing to dim down its nuke program, propaganda about Pakistan training the Taliban, the world hearing for the first time about Mugabe and his many election thefts in the media, and now this hacker attack happens. The odds please?

Just yesterday one of the organizations whose sites got hit, ICANN, voted in favor of easing restrictions on domain name assignments. What that meant is for a price, you could buy your own domain, like .happy or .earth. This would have done much for Independence and self-determination on the net (well, for richer people) and that’s the last thing the Illuminati ever want. I also see no coincidence with this.
One reason for engineering this is to strictly tighten controls over Internet usage. A creator of the original Internet system, David Clark, armed with a $200,000 grant from the government agency, the National Science Foundation, is working on creating a whole new internet architecture and phasing the old one out. He says that he would like to see a bigger piece of the pie for network service providers, which confirms what Alex Jones and his co-writers have been saying for years now. The bigger piece of the pie the big telecom and cable corporations are hungry for, laid out by Jeff Chester of The Nation, is this:

Verizon, Comcast, Bell South and other communications giants are developing strategies that would track and store information on our every move in cyberspace in a vast data-collection and marketing system, the scope of which could rival the National Security Agency. According to white papers now being circulated in the cable, telephone and telecommunications industries, those with the deepest pockets–corporations, special-interest groups and major advertisers–would get preferred treatment. Content from these providers would have first priority on our computer and television screens, while information seen as undesirable, such as peer-to-peer communications, could be relegated to a slow lane or simply shut out.

Under the plans they are considering, all of us–from content providers to individual users–would pay more to surf online, stream videos or even send e-mail. Industry planners are mulling new subscription plans that would further limit the online experience, establishing “platinum,” “gold” and “silver” levels of Internet access that would set limits on the number of downloads, media streams or even e-mail messages that could be sent or received.

That’s why you see the big cable and satellite companies offering net access now. This, along with a series of strategic mergers, will enable them to have their pie. People must appreciate the fact that corporations and governments are controlled by many of the same people who attend BIlderberg. It is so important to expose these people. They understand full well that more and more minds are coming to alternative media sites, their pawn media outlets are losing viewers and subscribers, and it makes them scared. Control over the Internet is the next desperate scramble on their way off the driver’s seat. It is then no surprise that the Bush White House strategy for winning the war on terror lumps in terrorism with “conspiracy theories”. To keep things in context, the Illuminati always encode 2 or more messages in one statement. The terrorists want to take away our freedoms. This is repeated all the time. Yes, those who control this planet are the terrorists. For those who are afraid to stand up for your rights because of the kids, or fear of whatever, this quote from the Bush strategy is right up your alley: “Indeed, the terrorists are emboldened more by perceptions of weakness than by demonstrations of resolve. Terrorists lure recruits by telling them that we are decadent, easily intimidated, and will retreat if attacked.”

I’ve read neocon Robert Kagan’s book, Paradise and Power: Europe and America in the New World Order. There were only three pages where he didn’t use the words weak or weakness at least once. If you understand prison life and how it is in there, you will understand life as one of the Illuminati. It is extremely close. Those smirks and grins we see on TV aren’t cause the cameras have smiley faces painted on them, all. Still another use for this is to use the hack attack (I bet you they got more on the way) as a springboard for Turkish integration into the EU and to help equate people that wish their countries not to be sucked into the black hole of the EU with terrorists. The ABC white Al-Qaeda thing says that “An April 2008 report from Europol also noted that an increasing number of European nationals attended training in Pakistan “and were later involved in, or suspected of, terrorist offences in the EU.”

God, how convenient. I joke about this so much but this is how they’re going to paint it. You’re against EU expansion or Turkey integration into the EU, you’re with Al-Qaeda, cause the new European war on terror takes precedence over your individual rights, ya know.

David Rockefeller said about Mao tse-tung, who ordered the deaths of 60 million Chinese, “The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.” Yeah. China is exactly what will be in store for us if most of us if we sit around like drugged pigs and wait to be killed. The first bits of it are bleeding through already. The British DNA demands for minor infractions, the 3 million cameras in London alone, warrantless spying laws, and the fake carbon based laws are creating a tyrannical ring of repression around us. But we can stop joining up in their manufactured wars and letting them get power off of our misery. To many, it may feel good to feel superior to Jew, the Black, the Asian, or the White, even though we might have a crap job that pays nil, it, when you examine the fruits of Illuminati controlled society, really isn’t. Standing together and mustering up the real strength not to fight them off, but not to let them in is what will really end this for the better.

ABC News: Caucasian Europeans training with Al-Qaeda in Pakistan

Copyright 2008 American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.
All Rights Reserved

ABC News Transcript
SHOW: WORLD NEWS WITH CHARLES GIBSON 6:30 PM EST
June 20, 2008 Friday
758 words
TERROR THREAT;
AL QAEDA
CHARLES GIBSON
PIERRE THOMAS (WASHINGTON, DC USA)

CHARLES GIBSON (ABC NEWS)

(Off-camera) Good evening. Intelligence officials say it is their number one concern. Caucasians from a European country who have graduated from an al Qaeda training camp. Such potential terrorists would be dressed in western clothing, drawing little notice as they board a plane bound for the US, coming to launch an attack. There’s no indication such an attack is imminent, but this scenario is of great concern to experts in and out of the government. ABC’s Pierre Thomas reports from Washington tonight. Pierre?

PIERRE THOMAS (ABC NEWS)

(Off-camera) Charlie, in recent weeks, government officials at the highest level have been warning that this threat is growing, and they have intensified efforts to block al Qaeda’s success in recruiting Europeans.

PIERRE THOMAS (ABC NEWS)

(Voiceover) This is Eric B. Intelligence officials believe he is a terrorist plotting attacks against US forces in Afghanistan and Europe. Eric B is a German national and he is Caucasian. The US says he represents the new breed of al Qaeda affiliated terrorists recruited in Europe.

REPRESENTATIVE PETE HOEKSTRA (REPUBLICAN

Well I think we ought to take it very seriously.

PIERRE THOMAS (ABC NEWS)

(Voiceover) US intelligence has determined dozens of Caucasian Europeans have trained in al Qaeda terrorist camps in Pakistan’s tribal regions in recent months.

REPRESENTATIVE PETE HOEKSTRA (REPUBLICAN

Westerners or western looking people have been in the region. They have been in contact with al Qaeda.

GRAPHICS: PAKISTAN

PIERRE THOMAS (ABC NEWS)

(Voiceover) The government suspects the western terrorists have been dispatched to plan attacks against Europe and possibly here in the US. They come from Britain, the Netherlands, Denmark, Germany, Romania and Estonia.

MIKE MCCONNELL (DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE)

They’re recruiting operatives from Europe? Why? If you’re from Europe, it doesn’t require a visa to fly to the United States.

GENERAL MICHAEL HAYDEN (CIA DIRECTOR)

They look western and they fit in.

ROBERT MUELLER (FBI DIRECTOR)

Our concern, great concern is that while it is happening in Europe, it is a one plane ticket away from occurring in the United States.

PIERRE THOMAS (ABC NEWS)

(Voiceover) And there is growing evidence some European recruits have gone operational. Two of the suspects arrested in a September 2007 plot to kill US soldiers in Germany were native Germans. This propaganda video shot from two different camera angles shows the March 3rd attack on an outpost in Afghanistan. That killed two US soldiers. The suspected suicide bomber, this man from Germany. He’s seen here casually preparing for his deadly mission. Members of Congress, including Republicans, say they are frustrated the Bush administration and Pakistan have not done more to shut down the camps.

REPRESENTATIVE PETE HOEKSTRA (REPUBLICAN

The result that we have today is not acceptable. You can’t have those camps in place in Pakistan.

PIERRE THOMAS (ABC NEWS)

(Off-camera) Charlie, officials in New York recently told me that those training camps in Pakistan, Ray Kelly, the police commissioner in particular, said those camps are a high priority and a big worry.

CHARLES GIBSON (ABC NEWS)

(Off-camera) All right, Pierre, so that’s the problem, but are there practical steps that Homeland Security officials can take to do something about it?

PIERRE THOMAS (ABC NEWS)

(Off-camera) Well one of the things they’re doing is they’re trying to kill as many of those operatives as they can using those drone planes in Afghanistan to hit them. Also, they are planning to step up the scrutiny of the roughly 30,000 or so Europeans that travel to the US every day.

CHARLES GIBSON (ABC NEWS)

(Off-camera) All right. Pierre Thomas reporting from Washington. Thanks.

CHARLES GIBSON (ABC NEWS)

(Off-camera) President Bush won a victory on Capitol Hill as lawmakers approved changes that he wants to a law dealing with antiterrorist surveillance. The house approved an amendment to FISA, that’s the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

GRAPHICS: FISA AMENDMENT

CHARLES GIBSON (ABC NEWS)

(Voiceover) It would protect telecommunications companies from lawsuits if they took part in the administration’s warrantless eavesdropping program. Senate passage is expected as soon as next week.

CHARLES GIBSON (ABC NEWS)

(Off-camera) On Wall Street, stocks suffered major losses today.

GRAPHICS: STOCKS

CHARLES GIBSON (ABC NEWS)

(Voiceover) The Dow dropped 220 points, the NASDAQ almost 56. The auto industry was a particular drag on the market today. Gas prices are taking a toll on the auto makers.

Google CEO might “change” Youtube if low revenues continue

If it can’t find a solution, Google should kill YouTube

June 13, 2008

Don Reisinger/CNET News

Do you remember the good ol’ days of YouTube? Back when a private company owned it and you could post and view whatever you wanted up there and no one would say a word because, well, it was practically bankrupt and copyright owners knew they wouldn’t get anything out of a lawsuit? Those were the days, weren’t they?

Now, after a $1.65 billion buyout by Google, YouTube is not only a veritable junkyard for all the crap we didn’t watch a couple years ago, but a bloated mess that costs too much to operate, has a huge lawyer target on it, and barely incurs revenue.

And to make matters worse, Eric Schmidt, the CEO of Google, has no idea what to do about it.

Speaking to The New Yorker, Schmidt said that it “seemed obvious” that Google should be able to generate “significant amounts of money” from YouTube, but so far, it has no idea what to do.

“The goal for YouTube is to build a tremendous community….In the case of YouTube we might be wrong,” he said. “We have enough leverage that we have the leverage of time. We can invest for scale and not have to make money right now, he said. Hopefully our system and judgment is good enough if something is not going to pay out, we can change it.”

But is changing it really the best idea? Since Google acquired YouTube, the company has tried desperately to make something, anything, from its $1.65 billion investment, but so far, it has failed miserably. Of course, it thinks that ‘pre- and post-roll’ advertisements may work, but the company isn’t too sure.

And therein lies the rub. If Google is unsure of how it can turn a profit on YouTube and it still has no idea if it will be able to get a return on its investment, why shouldn’t it cut its losses and do something drastically different?

Now I know that you’re probably thinking that I’ve lost it and my editor overlords will finally put me out to pasture, but think about it for a minute: why should a company that overpaid for a service continue to dump significant amounts of cash into it (not to mention spend millions on copyright lawsuits) if it has no chance of creating a valuable revenue stream?

Obviously Schmidt is doing all he can to allay shareholder fears over the YouTube debacle, but the very fact that he said anything about it is telling. And to make matters worse, Google’s ad revenue on YouTube is so low, it’s not even material to the financial statements. In other words, if Google is making anything with YouTube, it doesn’t even matter.

Let’s face it — the YouTube acquisition was a major blunder and regardless of how successful the company is in other areas, there’s no reason to suggest advertisers are willing and ready to place ads on videos of 18-year olds shooting milk out their nose or 80-year old men mooning a parade.

As far as I can tell, much of the online advertising money is going to sites like Hulu where the content is controlled, the shows are regulated, and the demographics of the audience are easily obtained.

How does YouTube and its content compare? The audience is huge, but it’s filled with a diverse set of people who generally view a select few of the more popular videos; the videos are barely regulated; and the content isn’t controlled in the least. Why should any advertiser want to send cash to a service like that?

Now I understand that Google wants to be a major part of the boom in online video advertising and I can’t blame the company for it. But doesn’t it understand the average company that’s trying to make people want a given product? It’s as if Google believes that sheer popularity is the only factor that advertisers use before they start throwing cash around.

But what about perception or target audience? Did Google forget about hitting the right market segment or putting ads in the right place at the right time?

Now, I should note that this doesn’t mean that YouTube won’t find itself advertisers. Certainly there are companies that would be more than happy to spend money on YouTube, but what kind exactly? Will YouTube become the dump of advertising where strip clubs and brothels will advertise on sexually-oriented videos and unknown politicians will sell themselves on left- or right-leaning clips? I certainly don’t see Johnson and Johnson sending ad dollars to YouTube anytime soon.

Lost amid the shuffle, though, is the question of ad dollars itself. How does Google monetize YouTube on videos that you create? Sure, it figured out the online business, but video is a totally different game entirely and without creative control over the content, ads may be found on videos that could leave a bad taste in Google’s mouth and yours.

Beyond that, YouTube costs Google millions each month and I’m just not sure how long the company really wants to maintain that loss until it follows a new course.

Killing YouTube would obviously be the last resort and I think there are a few options Google has before it’s forced to pull the plug. But if it can’t find a way to regulate some of the content that will host ads and it doesn’t attract high-paying advertisers, it’s sitting on a billion dollar mistake that keeps draining cash from its coffers with each passing day.

YouTube was the greatest blunder Goolge has ever committed and it better act quickly if it wants to turn it around. But if it can’t right the ship over the next few years and advertisers start spending more cash elsewhere, YouTube will be nothing but a repository for people to upload crappy videos that have no commercial viability. And for Google, that’s unacceptable.

Google is trying to run a business that is responsible to shareholders. And while it may have the cash to keep one of the world’s most popular sites running now, popularity of a website, in and of itself, should not justify its operation. If the company is losing millions each quarter, I simply don’t see why it should keep it up.

It may sound ludicrous to shut down such a popular site, but we’re entering a new generation of entertainment in the online space and pageviews don’t always mean success any longer. Especially if a company is spending millions just trying to keep a website alive.

I would love to see YouTube survive, but business is business, and if Google can’t turn things around, I simply don’t see any other option for Schmidt and company.

My analysis of Bilderberg 2008

by Stefan Fobes

This year’s gathering is quite a unique one. The Prince of the Netherlands joined his mom Queen Beatrix this year. And of course Queen Sofia of Spain attended, as always.

We’ve got Fouad Ajami, who seems to be a regular. He’s Director of the Middle East Studies Program at the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University. Another Arab mask on the NWO face. Probably being ordered to continue misrepresenting Arab culture to youth and propagandizing for the agenda.

Keith Alexander/NSA Director – Some new dirty tricks to watch for this year. Probably some more internet or communications stories put out to intimidate those who are up in the air decisionwise on whether or not to stand up for their rights. Headline stories, possibly started in fellow attendee Donald Graham’s Washington Post.

European Commissioners Peter Mandelson of England, Joaquin Almunia of Spain, Neelie Kroes of the Netherlands, and Charlie McCreevy of Ireland. All of these guys are commissioners for monetary and business related positions. Watch for significant EU actions that will have something to do with these pieces of the pie and policies that will strengthen big corporations, most likely at the benefit of the working public.

George Algoskoufis/Greek Minister for Economy and Finance. – The Illuminati have a plan to equalize things by economically raising up poorer countries and lower down richer ones, such as Britain and the US. Thus you see the influx of Arab, African, and Mexican immigrants thrown into those countries due to Illuminati created wars and financial crises. Algoskoufis has done much for the Greek economy. He is probably being ordered to keep things going in line with this.

Roger C. Altman/Chairman, Evercore Partners, Inc. – Evercore’s website characterizes their advisory managers like this:: “Evercore advisory professionals serve as trusted senior advisors to top corporate officers and boards of directors, helping them devise strategies for enhancing shareholder value.”

So they are have the corporate dukes and earls ears. Imagine what power an esteemed advisor with expert (whatever the Illuminati wants them to do) knowledge has. Evercore also manages other people’s money, including pension funds. Now, if you wanted to hit a company hard, just “manage” the money the right way, activate the newsdroids with talking points, and you get the public demanding whatever they want instituted. Any new pension fund scandals, check for the Evercore connection.

Ali Babacan/Turkish Minister of Foreign Affairs. – Probably told to get things moving faster with the EU. The ethnically divided Cyprus seems to be blocking Turkey’s EU integration. He will probably try and broker something real quick to rectify this.

Peter van Balkenende/Dutch Prime Minister. – Likely was told to keep the EU treaty on the table no matter what, and to help push more civil liberties thefts. What little liberties the Dutch have left, anyway.

Franco Bernabe/CEO, Telecom Italia Spa – Probable cooperation with the government in accordance with some future spying on the Italians. Also might help push through Internet2.

Key attendees include:

Kenneth Clark/Conservative Party Member of Parliament, Britain. – Longtime Bilderberger. Has pushed the EU in Britain like it was to save his life. Still does. Still will.

Carl Bildt/Swedish Foreign Minister – Isn’t it interesting that within two weeks of Bilderberg, the Swedish legislature passed a law where the government monitors all communications in order to fight “terrorism”. Sweden a terrorist target? Haha. Yeah it is when you see that the government is the terrorist and the people the targets. This guy is another classic EU PR man.

Tom Daschle/Former Senate Majority Leader – Now this was really unexpected. Watch for this guy to serve in an Obama presidency. He has rejected the possibility of being Vice, but wants instead to be Health and Human Services Secretary. Strange want, that. He’s going places, for sure.

Antonio Costa/Mayor of Lisbon & Rui Rio/Mayor of Porto – These are the two largest cities in Portugal. Something is being planned for the people of Portugal. The EU Constitution has been named the Lisbon Treaty, and a terrorist attack would help the EU treaty real well at this point, as well as a couple of reliable mayors who would help steer Europe in the”right” direction with moving speeches.

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York President Timothy Geithner and Fed Chairman Bernanke were in attendance, as well as Jean-Claude Trichet, EU Central Bank President, Mario Draghi, the head of Banca d’Italia, Josef Ackermann, Chairman of the Management Board of Deutsche Bank AG, Tom McKillop, Chairman of the Royal Bank of Scotland Group, and Seppo Honkapohja, Board member of the Bank of Finland. Bilderberg hunter Jim Tucker has reported from his sources that the European Bilderbergers are not in favor of an Iran war because of its economic effects — it’d crash things too fast. He said Bernanke might raise interest rates, and Bernanke has made gestures towards this already. Already the prospect of higher interest rates have caused oil to drop below $131 a barrel.

The real stars of the show, in my opinion, are Martha J. Farah, the Director of the Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, and Walter H. Annenberg, University of Pennsylvania Professor in the Natural Sciences. Jim Tucker has revealed that Bilderberg want their beloved chip in us this year. These two attendees combined knowledge of biochemistry, the brain, and neuroscience would do well in this. Watch for these guys on 60 Minutes, PBS, or the History Channel. Tucker also says that the justification for this would be to help treat a patient in an emergency situation. Probably might let the lid off of rampant medical malpractice and use that as an opener or something in the media that will tug at the heartstrings. Also, a new influx of blond haired/blue eyed terrorism is also planned to fear us into this. The only place I could think of where the blondes are militant enough and Muslim enough (to maintain congruence with the Al-Qaeda myth) would be Eastern Europe. I’d advise looking for any militant Muslim mass gatherings of those peoples there.

Harold E. Ford, Jr./Merill Lynch Vice Chairman – He might call for an amero this year due to the weak dollar.

Various so called journalists showed up, including Paul Gigot of the Wall Street Journal, some guy called Zeynep Gogus, founder of Euractiv.com.tr. The Illuminati love to fund fake groups so it looks as though there is grassroots support for their agenda. Other fake journalists include Oscar Bronner, publisher and editor of Der Standerd, Matthias Nass, Deputy Editor of Die Zeit, Flemming Rose, editor of Jyllands Posten, and the foriegn and business correspondents at The Economist. The Financial Times already published that article by New York Federal Reserve Head Geithner, and we should expect to see some pieces blasting Ireland for their no vote in the EU. Most of the news representation here is European so we’ll definitely see an explosion of EU propaganda or forums for those who are putting it out. In addition, some pro global warming or cooling fluff, the miracle of the new microchip brought out by Farah’s Center for Cognitive Neuroscience and scientifically backed by Professor Walter Annenberg. Judging by the recent rapid centralization, as we can see by Sarkozy trying to integrate even African countries into the EU, we will see in these papers more shilling for the EU and the Asian Union, so Asian countries can better assist and more efficiently interact in the event of disasters like Burma and China. Some of these puppets will also come out lauding the concept of a single currency.

Some media barons are there. Charlie Rose came this year. Very eye catching! He will give these puppets a soapbox for selling us Bilderberg plans, you can bet. Robert Pritchard, the head of Torstar Corp., which owns the Toronto Star. More support for hate speech laws you will see there, probably supporting the hellish Canadian Human Rights Commission. The head of French Television and Wire Service Christine Ockrent was there, so we can see some pro Sarkozy stuff, probably putting out more stuff on that flamboyant wife of his to take the heat off of him. Which was probably what that marriage was really about, when you look at what she says all the time.

World Bank President Zoellick was there, along with ex-Bank Presidents Wolfowitz and Wolfensohn. Will definitely call for a world bank and/or global currency.

The genetic freak Richard Perle was there, probably called in to calm down shilling for Iran. Condoleeza Rice was there pushing for it, but the Europeans were against it. They appear to be more senior than the Americans. Of course they are because America never won its independence in the staged war with Britain. Just like South Africa is still controlled by Britain through the Oppenheimers and Rothschilds.

Royal Dutch Shell Chairman Jorma Ollila was in attendance, will probably cut down oil prices in accordance with Bilderberg fears that things are going to hell too fast.

And some more shockers. Google CEO Eric Schmidt was there. Google gained a bit of buzz in ‘06 when they developed their sneak and peek through your PC microphone software which let them listen in (and record) what is being said and serves you ads off of that info. We should see them coming out with more of the same, as well as buying up more companies. A stated topic by Bilderberg itself was cyberterrorism, which means anyone exposing the agenda. Some Al-CIAda hackers might start popping up. So I guess Google will start messing around with youtube and the search engine, as well as help develop spying technology and software this year. Lovely. Possible Internet2 pushing along with Time Warner and Microsoft.

Microsoft Chief Research and Strategy Officer Craig Mundie appeared. This guy is in charge of immediate policy implementation at Microsoft, so since they haven’t invited the CEO, this suggests a plan that needs to be rushed through fairly quickly. He holds a master’s in information theory and computer science, which raises my hairs because when I looked up on Wikipedia what information theory is I found a section of the entry that said: “The field is at the intersection of mathematics, statistics, computer science, physics, neurobiology, and electrical engineering. Its impact has been crucial to the success of the Voyager missions to deep space, the invention of the CD, the feasibility of mobile phones, the development of the Internet, the study of linguistics and of human perception, the understanding of black holes, and numerous other fields.”

This is just the perfect skill set required to know how a microchip would function, and people would accept it more easily if they would have some extra enticing features such as internet interfacing or a new way to talk to your friends. The Microsoft microchip…could it be?

Out of Canada we have Heather Reisman, CEO and Chair of Indigo Books, the largest book chain in Canada, taking her orders. This chain has engaged in censoring in the past. They removed HItler’s Mein Kampf from the shelves and also issues of magazines that printed the cartoons of Mohammed. Canada is one of the top repressive countries in the world free speechwise. They might continue doing even more censorship this year. Might start censoring anti North American Union or anti immigration books and magazines. They are one of the top 100 employers in Canada so they might use that position to crush Canada and start outsourcing jobs to South America or Mexico. Big layoffs may be in the works.

Not many people cover the individual Bilderbergers themselves. If anyone has any info confirming any of this, or any other police state/world government statements or activities by Bilderberg attendees, just send it in to stefobes@gmail.com and it’ll be posted on the Bilderberg Watch area.

Wall-E, coming to a battlefield near you

by Stefan Fobes

Radio talk show host Alex Jones has said many times over the years that the US military has a plan to replace meat and blood soldiers with robot drones by around 2025. The main character from the upcoming animated movie Wall-E, which has as its plot a sprinkling of guilt tripping where humanity has polluted the planet so much that a robot was left behind, called Wall-E to clean things up while we go off gallivanting on some other planet, is highly reminiscent of this. Notice how there are never in large numbers films about how the British and US armies have polluted the planet with depleted uranium, the hundreds of nuclear weapons tests, or the results of the UN standing by and letting the Amazon rainforest be logged. Which produces 20% of the Earth’s oxygen. No, innocent children have to be programmed everywhere they go to get them ready for tyranny when they grow up. Here’s Wall-E.

Yes…so cute…so loving. I can see it now, the mommies going awwww, over it. I wonder if they’d coo over this?

The first Terminators, T-1 model from Terminator 3

Plus, a tank drone from Beast Machines, a spinoff of the popular CGI show Beast Wars.

A second way of controlling us through guilt is those two little words, human nature. Everything negative is ascribed to human nature. Lies, lies, lies. All you have to do is look at a baby or a small child sometime and you can see the facts of that. A little known piece of war history as documented by US Army historian S.L.A. Marshall in his work Men Against Fire is that during WWII, only 25% of soldiers would fire when ordered to. They would just freeze up like a deer in the headlights. Well, you can’t use America as bad cop to wage wars to make the nation state look bad so you can get in the good cop world government with that attitude. Marshall advised that training of soldiers be radically changed after the war in order to turn this state of mind around. They’ve done their job there quite well.

In Iraq and Afghanistan, the soldiers are being killed by the dozens a month by roadside bombs and ambushes by the local resistance fighters. Even though the coalition forces have raped the living daylights out of these countries, they might actually have gotten through it much easier if the UK special forces wouldn’t do things like planning terrorist attacks by dressing up as Arabs, bringing along guns and bombs, get caught in the act, and then actually arriving in tanks to the Iraq jail where their imprisoned operatives were at and then bust them out. Can you imagine someone from a foriegn country that has occupied yours doing this sort of thing and getting away with it?

As that article points out, the only car bombings and terror related stuff in Iraq is UK and US made. Create a problem, wait for the people to cry for help, and impose your solutions — military bases and continued occupation. However, the coalition forces are stretched dangerously thin, and the people would riot if there were a draft. But there is a second option. Send in the drones.

Is that a soldier there or a new type of drone?

When children see this now, they will associate it with the nonthreatening Disney-Pixar context it has been put in, and because the association will be formed early in life, it will be difficult to break without assistance. Which is exactly the idea of those who really came up with the idea for this. Why tank treads for a cleaner bot from the far off future? Even Wall-E’s love interest, Eve, was made up to hover around. On a side note, this movie looks like it was made, on one level, to assist with sex slave mind control programming scripts. Just the style of the creator of Wall-E talking about the plot sounds eerily similar to how ex Monarch slave Cathy O’Brien’s abusers anchored in her programming with lines from the Wizard of Oz film. The creator Andrew Stanton says: “WALL-E is the only one still truly living. And what is the ultimate purpose of living? To love. And WALL-E falls head over heels with a robot named EVE. Now, WALL-E’s feelings aren’t reciprocated because, well, she has no feelings. She’s a robot, cold and clinical.” Isn’t Wall-E a robot too? Just perfect for programming. The abuser or programmer falls head over heels in love (lust) for the sex slave, and robotically, the mind slave unflinchingly takes it. As former elite mind controlled sex slave Brice Taylor recounts, children’s animated movies are used routinely to assist in trauma-based mind control.

I was programmed with all the regular fantasy that children go through. I saw the Disney films and was heavily programmed to all of them – The Parent Trap, with the twin sisters – that was my base programming for my twin sister programming which was the high level programming that was used in the government to keep me from knowing what my internal twin sister who was actually involved with the elite families and the government was doing. I was shown lots of movies that had very profound programming – not that the movies were programs – but the way they were used was. The film, Lost Horizons, I was programmed to be ageless unless I left. That’s the theme of the film – when you leave you start aging. I had a lot of programs where they won’t age as long as they stay in. The books and films, it was one tool of programming after another – and they were all mainstream.

Disney-Pixar is Illuminati all the way. Walt Disney was a 33rd degree mason, and his Satanic legacy still continues today.

I dare anyone to read this and be able to say truthfully that there is no serious pedophile activity at Disney.

Continuing from before, US troops needed to be conditioned to fire 100% of the time. That’s where violent video games come in. Presenting the aptly headlined, the military-nintendo complex, Douglas McDaniel reveals:

Game designers frequently receive Pentagon funding and other assistance to create and promote such entertainment. Since turning Doom into Marine Doom, the Marine Corps Combat and Development Command (Quantico, Va.) has “evaluated more than 20 commercially available electronic games for their potential use as training tools for marines.” Atari’s 1980s game BattleZone was made for the US military, and used as a Bradley Fighting Vehicle training simulator, one of the US arsenals’ best anti-personnel devices. MAK Technologies (Cambridge, Mass.) won a 1997 Department of Defense contract to create Marine Exed Unit 2000, an amphibious assault game intended for both military and commercial markets. Interactive Magic (iMagic Labs), maker of the flight simulation game Carrier Strike Fighter, was given permission to roam the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln to film videos to ensure accurate visuals and a realistic feel.

Today, years later, I again decided to take Alex Jones up on his many challenges to look up what he said about the military having a plan to make robot drone armies, and sure enough, the UK Guardian had done a report on just that:

But that is only the beginning. By 2015, the US Department of Defense plans that one third of its fighting strength will be composed of robots, part of a $127bn (£68bn) project known as Future Combat Systems (FCS), a transformation that is part of the largest technology project in American history.

The US army has already developed around 20 remotely controlled Unmanned Ground Systems that can be controlled by a laptop from around a mile away, and the US Navy and US Air Force are working on a similar number of systems with varying ranges. According to a US general quoted in the US Army’s Joint Robotics Program Master Plan (http://tinyurl.com/yl7s52 – 13.8MB PDF), “what we’re doing with unmanned ground and air vehicles is really bringing movies like Star Wars to reality”. The US military has 2,500 uncrewed systems deployed in conflicts around the world. But is it Star Wars or I, Robot that the US is bringing to reality? By 2035, the plan is for the first completely autonomous robot soldiers to stride on to the battlefield.

It goes on about how other countries are making their own droid armies as well. The US military is even actively recruiting gamers, and holding tournaments with cash prizes. From Liveleak.com:

“With the Iraq war now in its fifth year and the UK and US forces struggling to control the growing anarchy,the American Army has begun targeting gamers as means of growing its waning ranks. The Army Gaming Championships is a sponsored event that allows gamers to play compeditivly for cash prizes, but ONLY IF THEY CONSENT TO AN INTERVIEW WITH A RECRUITMENT OFFICER. Gears of war,Resistance,Call of Duty 3 all feature in the tournament, and the goal seems clear: to make people associate war with having fun and winning money in an attempt to encourage them to sign up for service”

Planned all along. Don’t be surprised to see a new push in the near future to have these things introduced publicly to keep police officers out of dangerous situations and to more easily track criminals. You can’t have a remote controlled droid army without having people who know how to operate them. It’d take way too long to train raw recruits, or it would if the military weren’t bringing in violent games for them to play on their free time. And gamers are experts at operating consoles. As the nintendo-military complex article writer showed, the Pentagon has been funding this violent game stuff for at least two decades. These guys are real smart people up there, and they don’t throw money around for nothing. I mean, it’s like some people are on ego trips and think that these guys went to the best schools in the country and turned out stupid and inept when they’re the ones who are maintaining control over them. At least there’s something to laugh about in all this.

I’ve insinuated here that the government has some sort of control over the movie industry, which does sound nuts to the average propaganda suckled American. Watch [or right click save as to download audio. The mp3 starts at 83 minutes in] what Dean Haglund, star of the X-Files and its spinoff the Lone Gunmen has to say about the FBI and NASA directly handing the plots in for the shows. You’ll be interested in what the plot of the pilot episode of the Lone Gunmen was, which was shot in 2000, and aired months before 9/11. Hint: World Trade Center.

Sarkozy tries to integrate 6 African nations into EU, finds Gaddafi challenge

Qaddafi slams Mediterranean Union

June 18, 2008

Press TV

Libyan leader Moamer Qaddafi has slammed Sarkozy’s Mediterranean Union project aimed at linking Europe with six countries of North Africa.

“If the aim is to put Europe in league with six African countries against the rest of Africa, then it’s no!,” Qaddafi told the 10th summit of the Community of Sahelo-Saharan States (CEN-SAD), which opened Tuesday in the Benin capital, Cotonou.

“Initially the project was a union of six countries bordering on the Mediterranean and six European countries on the Mediterranean. We were in agreement with that. But then it became the whole of Europe and the six North African countries, against our interests and we are going to fight that project,” he continued.

Also about a week ago Qaddafi had voiced more criticism for French President Nicolas Sarkozy’s project — which is due to be officially launched on July 13 in Paris — as “a form of humiliation,” stressing that Africa will not “under any circumstances take the risk of tearing apart Arab or African unity.”

The Libyan leader, who eclipsed the other heads of state and government attending the summit, criticized other regional bodies such as the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and ECOWAS, the Economic Community of West African States.

CEN-SAD, the biggest economic grouping in Africa, which was set up in 1998 in Tripoli, on Tuesday added three new members: Kenya, Mauritania and Sao Tome and Principe.

The group aims to achieve economic union by doing away with obstacles to the free circulation of people, goods and capital.

New blood for Afghanistan – A second chapter

by Stefan Fobes

It’s been a trying time for the controllers who run things this year. Their puppet Bush dogged in the polls, the West starting to see what war is really all about, and with world focus newly aimed at economic matters, the prospect of an Iran war is fading away like water on a hot griddle. So what to do?

In the last two Star Wars films, Palpatine needed to create his Empire. But he couldn’t just go in and start turning a Republic into a People’s Republic right away. The Jedi would have made pizza slices out of him. So he created a problem, with the Separatists, headed by the guy he was secretly working with, Count Dooku. Slowly but surely, he gradually introduced “protection” legislation in the Senate, took the unprecedented step of putting in a gigantic army which his apprentice Dooku created, and bit by bit turned the once proud Republic into a police state. It finally culminated to where where the people had accepted a state of war, fear, and troopers walking around on the streets for so long that it was a snap to declare himself galactic tyrant and kill the heroes of the Republic amid the cheers of the people. All his opponents were killed brutally. Create a problem, or do everything you can to let an existing one fester, wait for the cue words “something must be done!”, and rush in what you want done. Nero did it by burning Rome and blaming it on the Christians, and Hitler did it by setting fire to the German Parliament building, the Reichstag, blaming that on the Communists, and activated martial law provisions of the German Constitution to take the seat of power with little resistance.

I knew there was an agenda in the pipes when NATO did an airstrike to take out the “Taliban” fighters, but had not much to go on. Found it intriguing when I saw the New York Times gripe about the hundreds of evil dark shadow Taliban forces infiltrating and taking over Afghan villages, laying mines, drinking blood, just partying away. There are just a few little problems with this Taliban hype we’ve been hearing in the background these past years. First, the only Taliban out there are the ones that were airlifted out of Afghanistan in 2001 by the US, as reported by MSNBC. This PBS clip fleshes things out more. Second, we are told that the Taliban is big into the heroin/poppy business. I guess we must be dealing with the Bizarro world Taliban, and not the one that destroyed the poppy crops of the Afghan farmers under pain of torture, calling it un-Islamic when they held power in Afghanistan, right?

After the coalition forces invaded Afghanistan, this tiny country became rife with production, becoming in just a year’s time the world’s biggest producer of world opium and heroin. This isn’t surprising one bit when you realize that the various intelligence agencies like the CIA and MI5 are the ones shipping the drugs into their home countries. See here this 60 minutes clip of the former head of the DEA, Robert Bonner, admitting the CIA’s involvement in the drug trade. The British military last year set up a program bullhorning Afghan farmers, telling them that growing poppies was understandable and acceptable. Not just that, they’re even buying the crops from the farmers! Why encourage poppy growth when they know what it’ll be made into? Why not encourage food production? Because helping the people is not the idea. A coordinated program like that takes calculation, not ineptness. Gary Webb, the San Jose Mercury journalist who in 2004 recently committed the modern miracle of killing himself by shooting himself twice in the head, rolled out in ‘96 his Dark Alliance series of reports detailing the CIA’s dealings with the contras and more importantly, how they channelled crack cocaine into South Central LA Black American neighborhoods. And then they have the nerve to pull young kids over for having nonaddictive bags of weed, bugging people by utilizing their disgusting CIA informant network of mob members, prostitutes, drug addicts, thieves and all sorts of society’s lovelies. Yes, that’s who they use in real life, people. Have you ever seen a government worker act all human and friendly like you see in those fake network propaganda shows? 9 times out of 10, hell no. Also, there was a CIA plane that crashed last year with nearly 4 tons of cocaine. But Al-Qaeda probably snuck it on cause they want to make the CIA look bad.

What is really really wrong here is the fact that there are no Taliban fighters running around conquering anything. UPI seems to be the lone wolf reporting this crucial fact:

Afghan police officials said Tuesday reports of Taliban extremists seizing control of several villages in Kandahar province are unfounded.

The Afghan National Police and Western coalition forces said they encountered no resistance while performing patrols in the province’s Arghandab district, which is near a prison from which 400 Taliban prisoners escaped last week.

“The patrol found no evidence that militants have overwhelming strength in the Arghandab area,” the officials said in a news release.

Obama, in one of his magic sermons, said that he would go into Pakistan against the country’s will in order to fight Al-Qaeda, something which ties in neatly with the aforementioned events, but actually seems so out of the blue compared to the stated policies of Bush and McCain and all the rest. Pakistan? They already caved years ago. They’re in the “nuclear family”. So why would they be against the US coming in? If the puppet BBC/CNN/Faux News repeat over and over that the Taliban leaders are headquartered in Pakistan, they would. People wondered why it was that Pervez Musharraf, the Pakistani dictator, took the rare step of writing his memoirs, where he says that the US threatened to bomb Pakistan if they did not cooperate with the war on freedom, while still in office. It looks like they might be pulling a Saddam Hussein act on the world stage, where they accuse a government of harboring someone or something they do not have, blitz our eyes with carefully crafted scripts of paid stooges chanting death to America, and then call in NATO or something of the sort.

The Illuminati, controllers, New World Order, whatever the nomenclature these days is, plan things on a holographic style operation model. One of the more interesting properties of a hologram is that you can store multiple images on one piece of film. When you aim the laser (look at) the film at one angle, you see one thing. Look at another angle, you see something completely different. Never do they do something for less than two reasons. As I go over in One more step to checkmate – The US-Burma-China connection, one of the real reasons for wanting to control the Mideast is that it is a stepping stone to China. A planned future conflict is on the agenda between the US, Britain and whoever, and China and Russia and their allies on the other “side”. The plan is to stragecially encircle China before it can gain any more ground in Asia. Therefore Mideast launchpads are needed. Oil is not the end plan here. It never has been. The oil companies make more money with oil supplies locked down and scarce than not. Basic economics. Pakistan was also a part of India, where there must be millions of ancient relics, and god knows what other valuable artifacts. I understand that most people who read this believe that this started hundreds of years ago, but if you follow the “religious” and secret society symbols and depictions of the “gods” and trace the genealogy of of those running things today, you will see that this whole game goes back thousands to ancient Babylon and beyond. Widespread knowledge of their origins and the secret knowledge they work with is not the plan. Thus all the bookburnings and tragedies like the looting and destruction of the Iraqi museums and libraries containing items weighing tons and relics of incalculable historical value. The only people who had the expertise to do that and get away unharmed were the US & British military.

Only time will tell if Pakistan will have that sort of a role in this. Another interesting facet of this is British Prime Minister Gordon Brown ordering up hundreds more British troops for Afghanistan on Monday. This is a total 180 from Blair’s pulling out half the British contingent from Iraq last year. On the same day that this was announced, hundreds of Afghan prisoners escaped after a group of fighters, which the mainstream media calls Taliban, came in and bombed the jail they were in. I was talking earlier about the way that the controllers get their plans in. What happened during this Afghan bailout is just what I mean:

US-led forces have played a part in a Taliban attack on an Afghanistan prison that set hundreds of militants free, some reports speculate.

Experts in regional affairs believe that Taliban militants attacked the Kandahar prison with the green light from US forces.

They say it is questionable – how could the militants dare attack the prison with US-led troops stationed just northeast of the jail?

The sources also noted that although clashes between Afghan security forces and the militants lasted for several hours, US-led troops did not intervene.

Ordinary people share the idea, asking how is it possible that hundreds of militants could attack a government prison, detonating more than 800 kilograms of explosives and foreign forces show no reaction.

They say the blasts were deafening and awakened everyone in the region. No one can claim not being aware of the attack.

No indeed. At least no one who wants stability and peace in Afghanistan, that is. If this escalates into a full scale conflict, this is the guy (probably dead in a ditch somewhere) you’ll be told is the leader of the Taliban.

We have a cute little eye in the triangle there in the video still, too. Every single major terrorist has been either been an intelligence agency asset or protected by them, as Steve Watson of Infowars.net shows us. Unlike the propaganda on CNN, he actually has sources who don’t have anything to gain from us believing their blockbuster assertations. Mr. Maulavi Jalaluddin Haqqani here is just the next one down on the roster. The International Herald-Tribune reports:

A quarter-century ago, Maulavi Haqqani was a favorite of American and Pakistani intelligence agencies and of wealthy Arab benefactors, for his effectiveness in organizing mujahedeen fighters from Afghanistan, Arab nations and other Muslim regions to attack the Soviet forces that had occupied Afghanistan in the 1980s

A little further into this article, it starts to look more liike a quarter second ago:

Meanwhile, Pakistani forces have been reluctant to move against the Haqqanis. According to European officials and one senior Pakistani official, Maulavi Haqqani has maintained his old links with Pakistani intelligence and still enjoys their protection.

Asked in 2006 why the Pakistani military did not move against Maulavi Haqqani, a senior Pakistani intelligence official, speaking on condition of anonymity, acknowledged that it was because he was a Pakistani asset.

And if the conflict continues and more digging is done, we’ll see the same old movie being played again — Western asset that will escape with his handlers when the going gets tough and no one will ever see him again. If he’s not dead already. This would actually get tiring if there weren’t actual lives at stake here. People, this is what your sons and daughters are being sent in to create. These are the consequences of letting yourselves be lied to.