How the Illuminati try to keep their power and control the public, using “it’s gonna happen, it’s gonna happen” tricknology-hypnosis
October 31, 2008 — Stefan Fobesby Stefan Fobes
Colin Powell, Joe Biden and others have been going around saying there’s some crisis in the works, it’s secret, we can’t tell you what it is. Folks, there’s no crisis happening. What is happening is a simple, but highly effective on someone who lacks the knowledge of it, trick.
The subconscious mind is always recording and listening to whatever is out there, and it exists in an open state, and without a firewall in its default mode It can also be programmed externally by immoral individuals in government, private tax exempt foundations, etc, who hold this knowledge. What is done, when people are told by said immoral individuals that so called terrorist attacks are gonna happen, gonna happen, gonna happen in six months or whatever, often specifically and intentionally spoken in an alarming and/or slow tone to bring up and maximize people’s fears, whether they be conscious or subconscious. If someone knows about the presence of a certain fear, say an overly high, pervasive fear of impending death, they can take that and use it to exercise control over another. At one level, for example, someone who is afraid of dying and someone who doesn’t like them very much is trying to kill them bloodlessly. They might roll on up outside the door when someone is showering and say, “Are you in there? I hope you didn’t fall and hit your head!” Terror explodes across that person’s mind as the thought takes on a life of its own and goes spiraling off into scenarios, such as the mind-program that we’re all born with tends to do. If someone is susceptible enough by being in a weakened mental and emotional state due to insanity, extreme financial hardship, loneliness, extreme emotional/physical trauma, drug/alcohol abuse, then they have a much higher rate of being susceptible to this than someone who isn’t. These are also the criteria used to select victims for gang stalking, and for subjects for the secret government projects like the covert electromagnetic weapons tests. The Illuminati understand this principle well and that’s why they have all those institutes like Tavistock and the like to study the mind (and break it) like it’s a 12 year old boy with his first copy of Playboy. At another level they know that through the subconscious, we create our reality, and this is how the experiences of nations and planets are birthed. This is already understood to a small extent via hypnosis, where a stage hypnotist can take a table and make you see a hippo. Mainstream science is inching toward this slowly but surely with their inroads into the placebo effect and the area of quantum physics.
This computer that I type on right now is why I believe that I create and can control my experience. When I get extremely stressed and am using it….bam! It freezes right up and I can get nothing done. But when I relax and calm down it’s like someone pressed the play button on Existence’s DVD player and everything starts right up again. Don’t know what anyone else’s experiences are on the subject, so I can only speak for myself. And on the last level of this, since the Illuminati know that at their root, all experiences are about cooperation and noncooperation, this again is another example of asking for consent to cooperate with creating a desired reality for the Illuminati. And that is whatever our fears will let the Illuminati do if they’re stoked up enough by being told there’s a crisis on the horizon and being vague about it or refusing to tell what it is. Because there is a certain democracy-like line where if a person has fear-based thoughts as the majority of their thoughts, their fear dives down to the subconscious for experiential manifestation. This answers the question that some, if they ask questions, have on why some people have fear but don’t manifest it in their experience, while others go over the cliff. But the (good?) thing is in my view that these people have succeeded so wildly in their efforts to mind control the population that the public has become so apathetic to issues that really matter due to the bombardment of everyone with irrelevant fluff like movies and TV shows that insult the logical mind and have no resemblance whatsoever to everyday life, ball games, and other things, that apathy and decadence is the response to the prospect of potential self-annihilation. If it’s not some tabloidy juicy whitey scandal or racist comment, well, it doesn’t even register. It’s funny, but it’s true. That’s what all those research dollars are spent for.
Alex Jones’s Terrorstorm documentary shows this beautifully with the guy in London who couldn’t see the cameras in front of where he worked even though they were about seven feet away.
But we can take back control of our minds and therefore our experiences by standing up and overwriting fear with calm, hard resolve. People are saying we have to take back our currency to take back our lives. But to really change things, we can’t do the same old thing in a different context. This is the central pillar of puppet Barack Obama’s campaign. To really change things, this requires us to totally turn ourselves inside out, and to create a whole new system of exchanges. I’m not sure what it’ll be, possibly involving some sort of barter system and locally made and distributed goods independent from the big corporations as is already done to a degree in rural areas, but, if humanity continues to use the same system that coralled it for so long, it will soon force us to make the decisions that we could have made under more gentle circumstances.
So what does the Obama logo mean, anyway?
October 30, 2008 — Stefan Fobesby Stefan Fobes
I was looking through Stewart Swerdlow’s Healer’s Handbook last week, and when I looked at his list of archetypes (symbols) at the back and their meanings…everything seemed to finally fall in place regarding my personal questions on what the little thing meant.
Suicide’s not my thing, thanks!
His archetype, called New Beginnings, is basically a rising sun which you are advised to visualize in yellow for it to work, and is said by him to be for attracting new experiences. It was so much like Obama’s logo, in the style, and because Obama shouts change all the time, and says America’s going to be different that I know that this is the same archetypal symbol and was put in to influence the public’s mind. He has already done this type of thing several times before with his “presidential seal” and replacing an American flag that was on his campaign plane with his campaign logo.
How the Illuminati do it is this: they know that when looked at, most people do not consciously know what the symbols (corporate logos, etc) , all carefully chosen, and each with definite and specific meanings, that are put before them mean, but the human subconscious and race group mind does understand and reacts to them. Also, since we create reality through the subconscious, this represents an asking for consent to create a certain reality by and for the Illuminati themselves. A no brainer to guess which sort.
But, there is still the red and white below the sun. It looks all Americany, doesn’t it, with it looking like the same red and white patterning that the American flag does. But what does the red and white on that and the American flag mean?
Back in the Middle Ages and up to the American colonial period, barbers were also the surgeons who, by the common practice of the day, cut people open to dump out the germs in the blood to cure the patients. It was pretty much sink or swim, and it is said that George Washington himself even died because he lost too much blood during one of these Stone Age procedures. Wikipedia says:
The origin of the barber pole is associated with the service of bloodletting.[1] During medieval times, barbers performed surgery on customers as well as tooth extractions. The original pole had a brass basin at the top (representing the vessel in which leeches were kept) and bottom (representing the basin which received the blood). The pole itself represents the staff that the patient gripped during the procedure to encourage blood flow.
That’s it. Now, in this context, it can be seen what the red stands for, and what the new beginning/change is. A new beginning of blood. Barack Obama has already pledged to go into Pakistan and to amp up the war on terror on Bin Laden, and on top of that, has also called for a School Corps, mandatory governmental service by mddle and high school age youth. It’s called voluntary but since it’s tied to educational aid, it’s de facto mandatory. On top of that a speech in Berlin where he calls for global government, his extraordinary ability to throw large crowds into insane fervor, and we have a new black Hitler on our hands. It doesn’t seem so much so like that now, but in 2 years max a good number of those who worshipped and shilled their little behinds off for Barack Obama will be begging for Bush back in the White House. Begging. Guaranteed. This is my notice posted to anyone with a head to please read my article with the real background to this creature, Selection 08 – Buyer Beware v.2 and to pass it around everywhere. The world seems, at a level, to want the experience of tyranny for a period with Obama, and the election is already his. Anyone with eyes can see this, what with the Secret Service and Obama already acting and reacting as though he’s already president. However, the info is here, and when what I’ve said is going to happen happens, and people read what I and others wrote about him, then people will wake up and the tide will turn in a most unexpected way. As always.
World Illusions 10.29.08
October 29, 2008 — Stefan FobesGovernment drug trafficking whistleblower Cele Castillo sentenced to 37 months in prison
Iran’s Ayatollah Khomenei says Iran has deep hatred toward US over CIA conspiracies – Pot calling kettle black. He’s CIA too! His own internal security agency was formed out of the old SAVAK with all the CIA assets still in it.
Blackwater announces plans to send their own navy in to get in on the Somali pirate action
Starvation during pregnancy can effect not only the baby’s genes, but descendents’ as well
Climate models consistently overheat Antarctica, research shows
October 28, 2008 — Stefan Fobes
Climate Models Overheat Antarctica, New Study Finds
5.7.08 / University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
BOULDER— Computer analyses of global climate have consistently overstated warming in Antarctica, concludes new research by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and Ohio State University. The study can help scientists improve computer models and determine if Earth’s southernmost continent will warm significantly this century, a major research question because of Antarctica’s potential impact on global sea-level rise.
Andrew Monaghan. [ENLARGE] (Photo by Carlye Calvin, ©UCAR.) News media terms of use* |
“We can now compare computer simulations with observations of actual climate trends in Antarctica,” says NCAR scientist Andrew Monaghan, the lead author of the study. “This is showing us that, over the past century, most of Antarctica has not undergone the fairly dramatic warming that has affected the rest of the globe. The challenges of studying climate in this remote environment make it difficult to say what the future holds for Antarctica’s climate.”
The study marks the first time that scientists have been able to compare records of the past 50 to 100 years of Antarctic climate with simulations run on computer models. Researchers have used atmospheric observations to confirm that computer models are accurately simulating climate for the other six continents. The models, which are mathematical representations of Earth’s climate system, are a primary method for scientists to project future climate.
Antarctica’s climate is of worldwide interest, in part because of the enormous water locked up in its ice sheets. If those vast ice sheets were to begin to melt, sea level could rise across the globe and inundate low-lying coastal areas. Yet, whereas climate models accurately simulate the last century of warming for the rest of the world, they have unique challenges simulating Antarctic climate because of limited information about the continent’s harsh weather patterns.
The study was published on April 5 in Geophysical Research Letters. It was funded by the National Science Foundation, NCAR’s primary sponsor, and the Department of Energy.
The authors compared recently constructed temperature data sets from Antarctica, based on data from ice cores and ground weather stations, to 20th century simulations from computer models used by scientists to simulate global climate. While the observed Antarctic temperatures rose by about 0.4 degrees Fahrenheit (0.2 degrees Celsius) over the past century, the climate models simulated increases in Antarctic temperatures during the same period of 1.4 degrees F (0.75 degrees C).
The error appeared to be caused by models overestimating the amount of water vapor in the Antarctic atmosphere, the new study concludes. The reason may have to do with the cold Antarctic atmosphere handling moisture differently than the atmosphere over warmer regions.
A chilling ozone hole
This map of Antarctica shows the approximate boundaries of areas that have warmed or cooled over the past 35 years. The map is based on temperatures in a recently-constructed data set by NCAR scientist Andrew Monaghan and colleagues. The data combines observations from ground-based weather stations, which are few and far between, with analysis of ice cores used to reveal past temperatures. (Illustration by Steve Deyo, UCAR.) News media terms of use* |
Part of the reason that Antarctica has barely warmed has to do with the ozone hole over the continent. The lack of ozone is chilling the middle and upper atmosphere, altering wind patterns in a way that keeps comparatively warm air from reaching the surface. Unlike the rest of the continent, the Antarctic Peninsula has warmed by several degrees, in part because the winds there are drawing in warmer air from the north. The models generally capture these wind changes, although sometimes incompletely.
The study delivered a mixed verdict on Antarctica’s potential impact on sea-level rise. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which operates under the auspices of the United Nations, has estimated that sea-level rise could amount to 7 to 23 inches (18-59 centimeters) this century, in part because of melting glaciers worldwide. The Geophysical Research Letters paper suggests that warming in Antarctica over the next century could offset that by about 2 inches if the continent warms by 5.4 degrees F (3 degrees C), as computer models have indicated. The reason is that the warmer air over Antarctica would hold more moisture and generate more snowfall, thereby locking up additional water in the continent’s ice sheets.
But the authors caution that model projections of future Antarctic climate may be unreliable.
“The research clearly shows that you can actually slow down sea-level rise when you increase temperatures over Antarctica because snowfall increases, but warmer temperatures also have the potential to speed up sea-level rise due to enhanced melting along the edges of Antarctica,” says Monaghan, who did some of his research at Ohio State University before coming to NCAR. “Over the next century, whether the ice sheet grows from increased snowfall or shrinks due to more melt will depend on how much temperatures increase in Antarctica, and potentially on erosion at the ice sheet edge by the warmer ocean and rising sea level.”
“The current generation of climate models has improved over previous generations, but still leaves Antarctic surface temperature projections for the 21st century with a high degree of uncertainty,” adds co-author and NCAR scientist David Schneider. “On a positive note, this study points out that water vapor appears to be the key cause of the problematic Antarctic temperature trends in the models, which will guide scientists as they work to improve the climate simulations.”
The University Corporation for Atmospheric Research manages the National Center for Atmospheric Research under primary sponsorship by the National Science Foundation (NSF). Opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this document are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation, NASA, or other funding agencies.
World Illusions 10.27-28.08
October 28, 2008 — Stefan FobesUS says bombing blitz was a warning to Syria – Total mob mentality. I get the sense the US is trying to prod the Arab nations into banding together for some reason.
Four Suspects ID’d in University of Central Arkansas Campus Shooting
Scientists develop artificial heart that beats
US Judge defines enemy combatant status as anyone who has offered assistance to Al-Qaeda-
State unemployment funds running dry
Former SEC Chairman: Globally uniform financial institution regulations needed
Fuel costs dJetown but airlines are still keeping those surcharges right on up
North Korea threatens to turn South Korea into debris
Thailand, still holding MILLIONS of tons of rice in its stockpiles, plans to barter some for oil with Iran – The problem is not a food shortage, it is a world where fear and greed holds sway and lack of efficient trading procedures. Even their own people are starving. Food crisis my ass.
BP profits soar 148% – Yeah. Same old thing as every year.
World Illusions 10.25-26.08
October 26, 2008 — Stefan FobesScientists try to stop hunger with digestion slowing, appetite suppressing foods
Island paradise with a dark history – Anyone that is surprised at all to see in the news, stories about rural, suburban, wealthy and/or, close knit communities having histories of child sex abuse or Satanic rings should not be. These all are people who are very secretive, at least among themselves, and these areas are fertile grounds for this sort of activity because of their very social nature.
What’s new? FEMA slow to hand out aid to those living in path of Hurricane Ike
An Iraq vet’s shocking PTSD recollections
Bad Times for Banks Means Boom Times for Credit Unions
How offshore garbage dumping contributes to ocean dead zones
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad suffering from exhaustion – What is it, Asix of Evil take out month or something?
Thailand to propose creating an Asian IMF
World Illusions 10.23-24.08
October 24, 2008 — Stefan FobesACLU: 2/3 of US population lives in Constitution-free zone
George Osborne warned: ’stop rubbishing’ Rothschild or you’re finished
CFR report: Washington must take the lead in preventing space warfare
Google pulls “anti Israel propaganda” from its Google Earth engine
Canadian man paralyzed for 5 months after contracting rare disease from flu shot
NATO fleet sets off to Somalia to fight the pirates – This has been a key topic of many of my articles. More and more, events will occur that will be publicized in the mainstream that will provide justification for interventions in Africa, to prevent China from gaining any more ground in the continent, as prep for the engineered, deliberately, WW3.
Chinese PM Hu Jintao urges Europe, Asia leaders to coordinate efforts during financial crisis
Eating too fast and too much can make you fat
October 22, 2008 — Stefan Fobes
Something to chew over: Eating fast makes you fat
10.22.08 / Jenny Hope / Mail Online
Slow down: People who wolf down their food treble their risk of being overweight
If you’re wondering why your waistline is expanding, don’t watch what you eat. Watch how you eat. Those who wolf down dinner apparently treble their risk of being overweight.
Scientists suggest the modern manner of eating too quickly – and until absolutely full – is a significant factor in the obesity epidemic.
Such eating habits pile on the pounds much more than expected, even taking into account the amount of calories consumed, the scientists found.
They suspect the joint impact of eating fast and until full overrides signals in the brain which would normally encourage a little more self control.
A study published today in the British Medical Journal Online First blames the couch potato lifestyles of fast food, larger portions, TV dinners and the demise of family mealtimes for contributing to the problem.
Professor Hiroyasu Iso and colleagues from Osaka University, Japan, carried out a study involving 3,200 Japanese men and women aged 30-69 years between 2003 and 2006.
Those participating were sent a diet history questionnaire. Half of the men and 58 per cent of the women said they normally ate until they were full.
Just under half of men and a third of women said they ate quickly.
The group of participants who said they ate ‘until full and ate quickly’ had a higher body mass index or BMI, the scoring system that measures obesity levels.
They also had a higher total energy intake than those who did not ‘eat until full and did not eat quickly’.
Both men and women in this group were three times more likely to be overweight than those who said this was not the way they ate.
Professor Iso said the combination had a ’supra-additive’ effect on the risk of being overweight – more than would be expected if each eating habit was examined in isolation.
‘If you eat slowly then there is some feedback from the brain that this is enough, and this helps stop you eating before you are full,’ he said.
‘It’s speculation at the moment but it is worth pursuing and fits with modern lifestyles.’
Dr David Haslam, GP and clinical director for the National Obesity Forum, said: ‘These kind of studies are very helpful because they’re not about genetic causes of obesity, which people feel they can’t do anything about, but human behaviour.
‘The great dietary gurus of a century ago stressed the importance of chewing food for a long time and eating slowly, and those messages are even more important today.’
- These articles need to be coming out faster. However, due to other concerns, this is a bit difficult. Please support this blog and help make it easier for largely unreported information to be in circulation.
