US Defense Department exam links protest with “low-level terrorism”

What’s hillarious about this is, the US State Department contacted Twitter and asked them to stay online so Iranians could coordinate protest plans on it, effectively themselves providing material aid to low-level terrorism, in the DOD’s view!

Defense Department sees protests as terrorism

6.10.09 / Josh Richtman / Oakland Tribune

This is a sampling of political writers Josh Richman and Lisa Vorderbrueggen’s blog, The Political Blotter. Read more at www.ibabuzz.com/politics.

June 10

Antiterrorism training materials used by the Department of Defense teach that public protests should be regarded as “low-level terrorism,” according to a letter of complaint sent to the department by the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California.

“Teaching employees that dissent on issues of public concern is something to be feared, rather than encouraged, is a dangerously counterproductive use of scarce security resources, making us less safe as a democracy,” Northern California ACLU staff attorney Ann Brick and ACLU Washington national security policy counsel Michael German wrote in the letter to Gail McGinn, acting undersecretary of Defense for personnel and readiness.

“DOD employees cannot accomplish their mission of protecting our nation and its values unless they understand that those values encompass the right to criticize our government through protest activities,” they wrote. “It is imperative that they are taught the difference between political, religious or social activism and terrorism.”

Among the multiple-choice questions included in its Level 1 Antiterrorism Awareness training course — an annual training requirement for all DOD personnel that is fulfilled through Web-based instruction — the department asks the following: “Which of the following is an example of low-level terrorist activity?” To answer correctly, the examinee must select “protests.” The ACLU wants that changed immediately, and it wants corrective information sent to all Department of Defense employees who received the training.The ACLU letter notes that this is particularly disturbing in light of the long-term pattern of government treating lawful dissent as terrorism. In the Bay Area, my colleagues and I reported exactly this in 2003, as the California Anti-Terrorism Information Center fed local police agencies information on protests, with catastrophic results. Two years after that, it was the California National Guard.

I guess I’m surprised not only that the government hasn’t yet learned its lesson about equating the exercise of our cherished constitutional rights with terrorism, but also that it’s so incredibly obvious in doing so.

German government pamphlet tried to link pedophilia practices with healthy parental love

German Government Publication Promotes Incestuous Pedophilia as Healthy Sex Ed

Micheal O’Brien, author on crisis of culture in West, says this “German state intervention in family life is a new level of auto-destruction”

6.30.07 / John Henry Westen / Lifesitenews.com

BERLIN, July 30, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Booklets from a subsidiary of the German government’s Ministry for Family Affairs encourage parents to sexually massage their children as young as 1 to 3 years of age.  Two 40-page booklets entitled “Love, Body and Playing Doctor” by the German Federal Health Education Center (Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung – BZgA) are aimed at parents – the first addressing children from 1-3 and the other children from 4-6 years of age.

“Fathers do not devote enough attention to the clitoris and vagina of their daughters. Their caresses too seldom pertain to these regions, while this is the only way the girls can develop a sense of pride in their sex,” reads the booklet regarding 1-3 year olds.  The authors rationalize, “The child touches all parts of their father’s body, sometimes arousing him. The father should do the same.”

Canadian author and public speaker Michael O’Brien who has written and spoken extensively about the crisis of culture in the West spoke to LifeSiteNews.com about the shocking and extremely disturbing phenomenon. It is, he said, “State-encouraged incest, which in most civilized societies is a crime.” The development is, he suggests, a natural outcome of the rejection of the Judeo-Christian moral order.

“The imposed social revolution that has swept the western world is moving to a new stage as it works out the logical consequences of its view of man’s value,” said O’Brien. “It is merely obeying its strictly materialist philosophy of man. If man is no more than a creature created for pleasure or power. If he is no more than a cell in the social organism, then no moral standards, no psychological truths, no spiritual truths can refute the ‘will to power’ and the ‘will to pleasure’.”

The pamphlet advises parents to permit young children “unlimited masturbation” except where physical injury becomes apparent. It advises: “Children should learn that there is no such thing as shameful parts of the body. The body is a home, which you should be proud of.”  For ages 4-6, the booklet recommends teaching children the movements of copulation.

Another product of the BZgA is a song book aimed at children of four and slightly older which includes several songs espousing masturbation.  The song-book entitled “Nose, belly and bum” includes one song with the following lyrics: “When I touch my body, I discover what I have. I have a vagina, because I am a girl. Vagina is not only for peeing. When I touch it, I feel a pleasant tingle.”

“The wiser and deeper position of most civilizations recognized that children need a period of innocence,” commented O’Brien.  “Now the state, the German state, is encouraging destruction of this state of innocence,” he added.  “This is consistent with the materialist philosophy that sees all moral norms and all truths about human nature as repressive. Pleasure and their distorted concept of freedom are their only guiding principles.”

According to the Polish daily newspaper Rzeczpospolita, the BZgA booklet is an obligatory read in nine German regions. It is used for training nursery, kindergarten and elementary school teachers. Ironically it is recommended by many organizations officially fighting pedophilia, such as the German Kunderschutzbund. BZgA sends out millions of copies of the booklet every year.

“A society such as Germany’s which is already in steep decline, indeed into degeneration, will only inherit the whirlwind of violence and further levels of degradation of their own people,” warned O’Brien.

“It has happened before in Germany. It has happened in other nations. Different causes but the same dynamic, the rejection of the moral order of the created universe results in radical evil. The German state intervention in family life is a new level of auto-destruction,” said O’Brien.

Rzeczpospolita reports that the Eckhardt Scheffer of BZgA claimed that before releasing the manual the organization consulted parents, educators and child psychologists. 93% of whom gave a positive evaluation.

Even for a Western nation, Germany’s billboards and television ads push the limits of public pornography.  Last year LifeSiteNews.com reported that a very popular teen magazine in Germany publishes nude photos of teens in sexual positions which would be in almost any other nation illegal child pornography.

With a licentiousness as the new morality of the secular materialist establishment and homeschool a forbidden practice, parents in Germany may well wonder what will transpire in public education.

“Will those children who are not liberated by their parents have special classes in their schools where they’re introduced to these practices,” asked O’Brien rhetorically.  “If the state intervenes in this way, what won’t it intervene in?”

O’Brien concluded his comments quoting G.K. Chesterton: “When men cease to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing, they then become capable of believing anything.”

To express concerns to German authorities:

In Canada:

German Embassy
1 Waverley Street
Ottawa, ON, K2P 0T8
Tel.: 613-232-1101 Fax: 613-594-9330
Email: // germanembassyottawa@on.aibn.com

(e-mail address hidden)

In the US:

German Embassy
4645 Reservoir Road NW
Washington, DC, 20007-1998
(202) 298-4000
The embassy can be e-mailed from its website: http://www.globescope.biz/germany/reg/index.cfm

To express concerns to German authorities:

President of the Federal Republic of Germany
11010 Berlin
Germany
Telefon: +49 30 20 00-0
Fax: +49 030 20 00-19 99
E-Mail: // Bundespraesident.Horst.Koehler@bpra.bund.de

(e-mail address hidden)

Chancellor
Angela Merkel
Willy-Brandt-Straße 1
10557 Berlin
Germany
Telefon: +49 180 272-0000
Fax: +49 1888 272-2555
E-Mail: // InternetPost@bundesregierung.de

(e-mail address hidden)

To read Michael O’Brien’s essay on the Family and the New Totalitarianism see:
http://studiobrien.com/site/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=10…

(with files from the July 9 edition of the Polish daily “Rzeczpospolita” by Aleksandra Rybinska with English translation provided by Joanna Najfeld)

Nick Cohen of the UK Observer’s terrible hit piece on the 9/11 truth movement

White supremacists working with Al-Qaeda? Some comedy in the mix too!

The unlikely friends of the Holocaust memorial killer

An anti-liberal ideology is being created by groups who would once have been sworn enemies

6.14.09 / Nick Cohen / UK Observer

In his brutality and his obsessions, James W von Brunn was both a relic of the old far right and a sign of things to come. Before he murdered a security guard at the doors of the Washington Holocaust museum – murdered, that is, at a memorial to a mass murder he denied – he was tied into the old web of international neo-fascism. As might be predicted, he went to meetings of the American Friends of the British National party, where he could share his desire to drive the blacks and the Jews from the “white nations” with what friends he could find.

He did not seem to find many. Eighty-eight years old, living in a condo, with a broken marriage behind him, he even joined Mensa, the habitual rest home for failures with delusions of grandeur. Stephen Tyrone Johns, the security guard, who died for politely opening the door of his car, was in every respect the better man. After the killing, American newspapers decided that von Brunn was a typical white supremacist. David Duke, the former Ku Klux Klan leader, had gloated that the first black president was a “visual aid” whose presence in the White House would recruit a new generation of racists and the press quoted civil rights groups who worried understandably about how many would sign up and how violent they would be.

Yet for all his roots in neo-Nazism, von Brunn was also a transitional figure who typified a wider range of forces than I can adequately squeeze into the “far right” label. He was an enthusiastic “truther”, who went on the net to deny that the al-Qaida attacks on New York and Washington had surprised the conspirators in power who secretly controlled America. He hated Bill O’Reilly of Fox News and neocons as much as the New York Times and Obama. “It doesn’t matter that you despise Jews-neocons-Bill O’Reilly,” he declared in one of his incoherent internet postings. “You pay the kosher tax – or else you don’t eat.”

The last time I heard similar remarks was not in the back room of a Leeds pub but the elegant gardens of Christ Church College. The nice, middle-class organisers of the Oxford Literary Festival had invited Israeli-born Gilad Atzmon who is – and you are going to have bear with me on this – a former winner of the BBC’s jazz album of the year award. He declared that “Jewish ideology is driving our planet into a catastrophe” and “the Jewish tribal mindset – left, centre and right – sets Jews aside of humanity”.

If he had been from the British National party, the festival would have had nothing to do with him, but as he was a fellow traveller of the Socialist Workers party, the literary ladies in their floral dresses and the bookish gentlemen in their ill-fitting jackets welcomed him to the quadrangles of Oxford.

I thought as I listened that, as so often in the past, what unites far left and far right is more important than what divides them, but readers may object that I am still talking only about tiny groups of extremists, who influence next to no one. The 9/11 “truthers” von Brunn joined have a far greater appeal, however. Admittedly, they do not seem appealing on first glance. In fact, they seem nutty geeks with wild eyes, who constantly film public meetings, in the hope that a member of the establishment will admit to being part of a global conspiracy in an unguarded moment.

Yet their idea that the west can only be the criminal and never be the victim of crime is everywhere. In 2003, a third of young Germans believed that al-Qaida was not a cult of death responsible for massacres.

A 2006 poll by the Pew Research Centre found that a majority of Muslims in Indonesia, Egypt, Turkey, Jordan and Pakistan denied that Arab terrorists could have carried out the 11 September attacks. Of British Muslims, 56% agreed that the hijackers were innocent and 25% went on to say “the British government was involved in some way” with the 7/7 atrocities in London.

Whenever I argue with “truthers”, I point out as gently as I can that they are the children of the Holocaust-deniers. Just as the old far right denied the crimes of the German fascists of the 1940s, so they deny the crimes of the clerical fascists of our day. Yet although I have no doubt some of them will end up in neo-Nazi parties, I sense that the majority are moving in a new direction.

In Voodoo Histories, his elegant evisceration of the paranoid mentality, David Aaronovitch points out that former fascists and communists, secular Ba’athists, radical Islamists, Russian nationalists and America firsters – people who would never have worked together in the past, and who indeed killed each other in the past – are fusing ideas and creating a new ideology. Their politics, he writes, is “a loose coalescence of impulses: anti-globalisation, broadly anti-modernist and anti-imperialist – with imperialism being inevitably and solely associated with American power”.

If you think this fusion is limited only to cranks, consider how human rights groups and secularists are having to combat new and powerful alliances the new anti-liberal ideology has encouraged. Earlier this year, the dictatorships which dominate the United Nations’ comically named Human Rights Council tried to pass a motion stating that defamation of religion should everywhere be a crime. For obvious reasons, Islamic states pushed the new blasphemy law and abused the language of liberty as they attempted to justify the punishment of Muslims and non-Muslims who criticised or mocked orthodoxy.

Strikingly, states that 20 or even 10 years ago would have been their enemies rushed to their side. Putin’s Russia, which has been engaged in the dirty war against the Islamists of Chechnya, supported the assault on dissent. As did Cuba’s communist atheists, the supposed socialists of Chávez’s Venezuela and the Brezhnevian relics from Belarus. The promise of an attack on the liberal values of freedom of speech and freedom of conscience produced a united front.

As he sat in his condo, nursing his grievances and watching his Mel Gibson movies, James W von Brunn may have seemed a relic of the fascist movements of the 20th century. But in his grubby, instinctive way, he was groping towards the new authoritarian alliances of the 21st.

Evidence that digital TV is intended to streamline mind control via ELF

More Evidence: HD TV is a Set Up for Mind Control

To begin with, take 10 minutes and watch this 60 Minutes video:

Leslie Stahl makes some very interesting comments on the morality and ethics of mind-control.

Here are mine:

1. The technology called FMRI (Functional Magnetic Resonance) is old and archaic actually. Mengele and others were “reading” brain waves via magnetic resonance graphing in the early 70’s. Boston-Logan Airport is already using new light-wave beams to scan and read air traveler’s intentions before they board the planes.

2. The German individual Stahl interviewed was very hesitant to reveal exactly who had the mind-reading technology today. Again, just look at the U.S. Patents issued in the last decade to realize the height and breadth of the mind-control explosion — and keep in mind that patents are usually applied for after the technology has been proven to be commercially viable via working models.

3. The FMRI “computer” that “reads the mind” is just one side of the coin. It is much, much easier to produce emotions and impulses into the brain than to actually read the brain via computer programs.

4. This technology needs much more bandwidth space than is currently provided by analog signals in order to be implemented. Thus, the need to switch to digital signals exclusively.

5. This technology, in the wrong hands, is a bigger threat to individual freedom than any standing army.

6. Is Homeland Security the “wrong hands”? Why is this just now beginning to be reported by such news programs as “60 Minutes”?

Read this patent abstract, and then read my exposé on digital TV once again in the context of Stahl’s report.

USP # 6,488,617 (December 3, 2002)

Title: Nervous System Manipulation by EM Fields from Monitors.

Issued to: Loos, Hendricus.

Abstract: Physiological effects have been observed in a human subject in response to stimulation of the skin with weak electromagnetic fields that are pulsed with certain frequencies near 1/2 Hz or 2.4 Hz, such as to excite a sensory resonance.

Many computer monitors and HD TV screens, when displaying pulsed images, emit pulsed electromagnetic fields of sufficient amplitudes to cause such excitation. It is therefore possible to manipulate the nervous system of a subject by pulsing images displayed on a nearby computer monitor or DIGITAL TV set. For the latter, the image pulsing may be embedded in the program material, or it may be overlaid by modulating a video stream, either as an RF signal or as a video signal.

The image displayed on a computer monitor may be pulsed effectively by a simple computer program.

For certain monitors, pulsed electromagnetic fields capable of exciting sensory resonances in nearby subjects may be generated even as the displayed images are pulsed with sublimiinal intensity.

The new Star Trek movie: Programming viewers to accept a military dictatorship

Dawson’s Trek

5.12.09 / Christopher Knowles / The Secret Sun

Well, I almost hate to say it, but this Onion video pretty much nails my reaction to the new Star Trek. I thought it was great fun – a highly entertaining and extremely well-produced thrill ride. Visually, this may be the best space opera to date. All the creatives involved seem to be die-hard fans trying to bring the concept back to basics and make it appealing for today’s audiences.

But therein lies the rub, as some obscure Trek villain might say.

Hollywood seems to think that “today’s audiences” have been dumbed down to the point that the only characters that are allowed to speak anything resembling proper English are either bad guys or androids. As much fun as the story is to this film, the kind of jokey, ironic fan-speak that you hear on the various Stargate or Joss Whedon franchises took me out of the story time and again.

Why does this matter? Well, the kinds of young, ultra-achieving military types we’re supposed to believe these characters are simply wouldn’t speak and behave the way these characters do, because these characters relate to one another like fans at a cosplay con. I realize you don’t want them to be so earnest they’re impossible to relate to, but I really needed to feel there were some stakes involved here. As exciting as this film looks, there is no trace of the gravity of the original series. The villain was especially casual. I can see wanting to escape that portentious villain cliche, but hearing something to the effect of “Hi Christopher, I’m Nero” didn’t fill me with dread.

The cast looked like Dawson’s Creek in space for the most part, most especially James Tiberius van der Kirk. The fact is that outside of Quinto as Spock and Pegg as Scottie, you could’ve gotten anyone to play these roles, simply because the amazing infrastructure Abrams and crew create around them is so idiot-proof. Millions of folks are going to see this movie and have a wonderful, good old-fashioned night at the movies, but I’m willing to be that no one’s life is going to be changed by it.

The funny thing is that I’ve seen people bash Nemesis time and again writing about this new film, but in fact the new Trek grabs a boatload of ideas from the last TNG film. We have Romulans, a doomsday weapon, a planned attack on Earth, two incarnations of Trek icons encountering one another, a lost crewman on a desolate, dangerous planet, a captain held hostage and probably a ton of other bits I’m forgetting at the moment.

So this is Trek for the masses – or today’s masses. I’m OK with that. To be honest, Voyager and Enterprise nearly extinguished my enthusiasm for the franchise. But the signals I’m getting from my tinfoil hat are telling me that maybe there’s a reason to rejigger the concept for all of the Justin’s and Courtney’s out in the food courts of Anytown, USA. Here’s what I wrote about the Trek weltanschuang a year ago:

Under the smiley veneer of humanism, politically correct pandering and New Deal-vintage liberalism, the Federation certainly feels like a socialist military dictatorship. At the core of the Federation and at the core of Starfleet is the presence of a expansionist philosophy (the Federation must grow to survive) and a Masonic, heirarchal world view. And these stories are all told exculsively from the point of view of elite military officers on spaceships armed with world-destroying arsenals.

Let’s just say that the Trekkers you see milling around a Creation con might be perfectly nice folks, but probably not the targets of any potential social engineering messages embedded in big budget sci-fi. But certainly the high school jocks and preps attracted to this new age Trek might be. Of course, this is all just blue sky here, but there a few themes in this film that caught my attention:

  • As in previous Treks, the message is clear- civilians are either trouble-makers or just plain trouble.
  • Young people who can’t fit into society need to be militarized, like Kirk and Spock.
  • The best place for ambitious young people to make their mark is in the military.
  • Even individuals in their 30s or so who can’t cut it out there should try enlisting, like McCoy.
  • Exactly as in Dark Knight, we see that the world (or the galaxy, in this case) is filled with psychotics whose mission in life is pure, mindless destruction. Only complete militarization can save us.

Now, don’t get me wrong- this kind of thing has been part of sci-fi since Doc Smith’s heyday. Sometimes you just have to accept the in-universe logic of these things. On the other hand, I was struck that Starfleet’s vibe in this new Trek is more Starship Troopers than ever before, right down to the 30s vintage dress uniforms. If you were looking to get the youth pumped up for the militarization of space- or society, for that matter – this is a very good start. It will be interesting if any particular interests try to capitalize on the film’s sucess for any kind of agenda in the months to come.

In the meantime, go see Star Trek and get yourself a big old bucket of popcorn. You’ll probably have a blast. If you need me, I’ll be up watching some old-school Quatermass with the missus.

UK East Lancashire children to view film urging them to tattle on anyone expressing “extremist views”

East Lancashire youngsters see film on terrorism danger

6.8.09 / Sally Henfield / Lancashire Telegraph

PRIMARY school pupils are to be shown a film about the dangers of terrorists as part of an organised safety day.

More than 2,000 10 and 11-year-olds will see a short film, which urges them to tell the police, their parents or a teacher if they hear anyone expressing extremist views.

The film has been made by school liaison officers and Eastern Division’s new Preventing Violent Extremism team, based at Blackburn.

It uses cartoon animals to get across safety messages.

A lion explains that terrorists can look like anyone, while a cat tells pupils that should get help if they are being bullied and a toad tells them how to cross the road.

The terrorism message is also illustrated with a re-telling of the story of Guy Fawkes, saying that his strong views began forming when he was at school in York. It has been designed to deliver the message of fighting terrorism in accessible way for children.

The film is being shown as part of Lancashire Police’s Streetwise campaign.

Pupils will also be taught how to rescue someone from water, identify risk of fire in the home, the risks of stranger danger and using the internet as learning how to stay safe whilst out and about.

The event, is now in its 16th year but it is the first year that terrorism has been on the agenda.

A spokesman for Lancashire Police said: “Children attending the event will be offered an interactive presentation delivered by police officers who are based in schools. It tells children who they can speak to if they are worried about anything.

“Officers also introduce the issues surrounding terrorism at a very basic level, which forms part of the wider presentation encouraging children to report any concerns around safety to their parents, teachers, or local police.”

Fed Factory – High school mixes Homeland Security training & algebra

High school mixes algebra and homeland security

6.10.09 / Bob Drogin / LA Times

Reporting from Ft. Meade, Md. — Flanked by hand-drawn posters about terrorist groups, including Al Qaeda and the Ku Klux Klan, Tina Edler solemnly addressed her ninth-grade students.

“One new vocabulary word today is ‘agro-terrorism,’ ” she said.

The meaning — deliberate sabotage of agriculture or food supplies — flashed on a screen behind her. Opening their school-issued laptops, the teens quickly found a possible example on the Internet.

In 1989, a group calling itself the Breeders hit headlines when it threatened to release thousands of crop-killing Mediterranean fruit flies in Southern California unless the government halted aerial pesticide spraying. The spraying continued, and scientists never could determine whether the group played a role in the Medfly infestation that year. Its members were never identified.

“That counts,” Edler said. “It’s part of history.”

Meade High School, where Edler teaches, made its own history this year. The long-troubled public high school become one of the first in the nation to offer a four-year course in domestic security. The goal: to help graduates build careers in one of America’s few growth industries.

“This course will help me get a top-secret security clearance,” said Darryl Bagley, an eager 15-year-old. “That way I can always get a job.”

Meade offers its 2,150 students a standard high school curriculum, including electives like advanced calculus and carpentry. But the 90 ninth-graders who chose the new homeland security program this last school year focused on topics torn from the headlines: Islamic jihadism, nuclear arms, cyber-crime, domestic militias and the like.

New themes even were added to their science, social studies and English classes.

“There’s a lot of homeland security issues in ‘Romeo and Juliet,’ ” said Bill Sheppard, the program coordinator. “Like, how do you deal with infiltration in your own family?”

After two years, the students can choose a related career track — like law, public service or engineering — to prepare for college or a job.

Joppatowne High School in northern Maryland started a similar program in 2007. And two more schools, one near Baltimore and the other in the state’s western panhandle, will follow next fall, said state education department spokesman Bill Reinhard. Schools in other states, including California, are watching closely.

So are critics. Mother Jones, the liberal magazine, has slammed Joppatowne High as a “black ops jungle” that is “dedicated to churning out would-be Jack Bauers.” It warned of a “troubling landmark” in public education.

But Jonathan Zimmerman, a New York University professor who studies the politics of education, said the courses were “a wonderful idea as long as they educate the kids and don’t indoctrinate them. That’s the only danger.”

Leah Skica, a science teacher who heads the Joppatowne program, said the curriculum presented an opportunity. Her school is near two Army facilities: the Aberdeen Proving Ground, a test site for munitions and equipment, and the Edgewood Chemical Biological Center.

“High schools focus on traditional careers,” she said. “We wanted to introduce students to what’s going on in our local area, whether it’s engineering for homeland security, computer security, or chemical and biological research.”

That thinking already has swept higher education.

Since the Sept. 11 attacks, about 320 colleges and universities have begun awarding graduate or postgraduate certificates or degrees in emergency management, bio-defense and other security-related fields. Federal grants and a steady growth in jobs have driven the surge.

“It’s the fastest-growing field in academia,” said Stan Supinski, who tracks education issues at the Center for Homeland Defense and Security at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey. High schools, he said, “may be the next trend.”

Meade hardly seems a cutting-edge school. About 15 miles south of Baltimore, it has struggled for years with low test scores, high dropout rates and a history of racial violence. A third of the students come from impoverished families.

“In the past, if you read an article about Meade High School, it would have been about something bad happening,” said Claire Louder, head of the Chamber of Commerce of West Anne Arundel County, where Meade is located. “It had a very questionable reputation.”

County officials and Meade’s energetic principal, Daryl Kennedy, were determined to improve the school’s standing. Programs already catered to high-achieving students and to those at risk of failure. They decided to excite what Kennedy called “average B students” in the middle.

“Homeland security was the obvious fit for us,” Kennedy said. “It’s in our backyard.”

The school lies just inside the Army’s Ft. George G. Meade, which has about 35,000 employees. A majority work at the National Security Agency, which eavesdrops on global communications and is America’s largest intelligence organization. Defense companies dot nearby hickory and oak forests.

And more jobs are coming. Under plans announced in 2005, the Pentagon will shut or shrink dozens of military bases across the country and transfer thousands of families to the Ft. Meade area over the next two years.

The school began designing the program in 2006. Sheppard, a genial, white-haired English teacher, was put in charge. Edler was hired as lead teacher.

Now 31 and “a little overzealous,” as she puts it, Edler has masters degrees in human resource management and business administration and has completed course work this year for a college certificate in homeland security.

Creating a syllabus was the first challenge. No one has published a high school textbook on domestic security. “We were stabbing in the dark on the curriculum,” Sheppard said.

They appealed for help from parents, local businesses, Ft. Meade officials and other federal and state agencies. Col. Daniel Thomas, Ft. Meade’s base commander, was skeptical at first.

“It seemed like homeland security was so vague; it was about everything,” he said. “I said, ‘Let’s make this something real. With all the resources at my fingertips, I can fill your entire curriculum.’ “

For example, he arranged for students to watch emergency response drills for a chemical weapons attack and a school shooting.

“Law enforcement, computer security, response to chemical and biological hazards, the study of intelligence applications, we could help with all that,” he said.

Other groups pitched in as well. Students went on at least eight field trips during the year, including to a busy Coast Guard station in Baltimore and the Marine base in Quantico, Va. Speakers from the FBI and the Food and Drug Administration came to class. A retired combat artist dropped in to discuss his work.

“The reason it works is it’s not just textbooks,” said Carol Strudwick-Miller, secretary of the school’s PTA. “They’re getting out in the field. They’re seeing things in the real world. The parents love it. So do the kids.”

Shantelle Gordon, 14, had heard of the FBI before taking the class. “Now I know the NSA, TSA, EPA and FDA,” she said proudly, reeling off acronyms of federal agencies like a practiced bureaucrat.

Terrence Frye, 14, marveled at being in the program at all. “I’ve never been the first to do anything before,” he said shyly.

Several students will intern this summer at a Pentagon agency at Ft. Meade that runs information technology and communications support. Others will go to a “CSI camp” taught by an Army criminal investigator. At least one student found a slot at NASA’s nearby Goddard Space Flight Center.

Regal Decision Systems Inc., a technology company, helped students collect data and run simulation software to design a new emergency evacuation plan for the school. President Joe Borkoski Jr. became a huge fan.

“These kids think outside the box,” he said. “They don’t even know what the box is.”

Edler’s classroom is on the lower level, near the woodworking shop. One corner has armchairs, another a table covered with military and intelligence magazines. The walls are lined with students’ posters that compare extremist groups at home and abroad.

One traces Hezbollah, a Lebanese Shiite militant group, and the Militia of Montana, which is run by white supremacists. Others look at domestic groups that have attacked abortion clinics, animal testing labs and other targets.

Edler said she tried to inform her students, not scare them. But she doesn’t shy away from controversial topics.

Students discussed how the CIA used waterboarding — which simulates drowning and which critics call torture — hundreds of times during interrogations of detainees. Classes also debated the cost to society of the NSA’s wiretapping Americans without seeking court warrants.

“The more security you have, the less freedom you have,” said Alonzo Abraham, 14. “We need a balance.”

Most of this year’s students have signed up for the advanced course next fall. An additional 106 teens have enrolled for the introductory class, which will be open to all grades.

More teachers will be hired and more courses are planned, including Arabic and Chinese language instruction.

“We will expand from year to year,” Sheppard said. “We want to give everyone in the school a chance to at least taste the program.”

That’s fine with Arrevia Whitlow, a registered nurse who has two sons in Edler’s domestic security class.

Whitlow said she “fought and fought and fought for my kids not to go Meade. I thought it would be all fighting and guns there. I heard the teachers were substandard. I wrote letters to the board and did everything I could. And I lost.”

A year later, her eldest son, Mikal, wants to study aerospace engineering. Jordan, who is more artistic, is considering computer animation. Both lined up summer internships and recently met with their congressman, Democratic Rep. Elijah E. Cummings.

Whitlow said she persuaded her husband to turn down a job transfer until her sons graduate.

“I didn’t want them to go to Meade High School,” she said. “Now I don’t want them to leave. Isn’t that something?”

UK scientist to test for psychic ability through Twitter

Guess what we’re thinking… Twitter to test psychic powers  in scientific study

6.1.09 / Daily Mail

Have you ever suspected you could be psychic? Now you can find out thanks to an experiment to be conducted through Twitter.

In the first scientific study to use the social messaging service, experts will investigate ‘remote viewing’ – the psychic ability to identify distant locations.

Thousands of members of the public will be asked to ‘Tweet’ their impressions of a randomly chosen spot in the UK visited by one of the researchers.

fortuneteller

Dr Wiseman has asked people to test their extra-sensory perception

Then they will vote for which of five photographs on a website shows where the visitor was standing. The trial will be repeated with visually different locations four times.

If at the end of the experiment the votes correctly identify at least three targets, it will support the existence of extra-sensory perception.

Study leader psychologist Professor Richard Wiseman, from the University of Hertfordshire, who specialises in investigating psychic phenomena, said: ‘Personally, I’m sceptical, but three hits would be against odds of one in 125, which would be quite impressive.’

He hopes as many as 10,000 people will take part in the research, being conducted in collaboration with New Scientist magazine.

Prof Wiseman will travel to each target location at 3pm on each day this week and send a message to thousands of participants to ‘Tweet’ their thoughts about his surroundings.

Twenty minutes after sending this message he will transmit another containing a website address on which participants can view photographs of the actual location and four decoys. They will then cast their votes.

Dr Richard Wiseman

Dr Richard Wiseman has conducted a number of experiments testing psychic powers

‘I have staged several mass participation studies over the years, but this is the first to use Twitter,’ said Prof Wiseman.

‘The instant nature of Tweets allows thousands of people to take part in real time, making it perfect for an extra-sensory perception experiment.

‘If the effect does exist then having so many people participate will help detect it.’

Prof Wiseman is not the first scientist to investigate remote viewing.

At the height of the Cold War in the 1970s, the CIA spent 20 million dollars (£12.5 million) conducting remote viewing experiments in a real-life case of the ‘X-files’.

The ‘Stargate Project’ was aimed at conducting ‘psychic spying’ missions against the Soviet Union.

‘The Russians were doing the same thing, and there was evidence from laboratory studies that suggested there might be something going on,’ said Prof Wiseman.

‘The CIA just thought it was worth a try and ran the programme for about 10 years.’

Remote viewing has been linked to astral projection and telepathy, but no-one knows how it might work.

Unlike the CIA, Prof Wiseman will be looking for a group effect rather than individual ability.

This is a phenomenon known as ‘the wisdom of the crowds’.

‘If you have a jar full of jellybeans and you want to know  many are in it, you get the most accurate estimate by averaging a number of different people’s estimates,’ said Prof Wiseman.

The results of the experiment should be known on Friday.

Sumit Paul-Choudhury, online editor at New Scientist, said: ‘There have been mass participation experiments since the start of mass communication and this is the next step.

‘If we find some sort of effect then we can get into speculating about how it works.’

You can take part in the experiment by signing up to Twitter and ‘following’ Richard Wiseman

Synagogue bomber “plot” never would have gotten off the ground without FBI informant

FBI Blows It: Supposed Terror Plot Against NY Synagogues Is Bogus

Turns out it is really the handiwork of a creepy FBI informant. The story strengthens the narrative that the “homeland” is under attack. It’s not.

5.23.09 / Richard Dreyfuss / The Nation

By the now, it’s maddeningly familiar. A scary terrorist plot is announced. Then it’s revealed that the suspects are a hapless bunch of ne’er-do-wells or run-of-the-mill thugs without the slightest connection to any terrorists at all, never mind to Al Qaeda. Finally, the last piece of the puzzle: the entire plot is revealed to have been cooked up by a scummy government agent-provocateur.

I’ve seen this movie before.

In this case, the alleged perps — Onta Williams, James Cromitie, David Williams, and Laguerre Payen — were losers, ex-cons, drug addicts. Al Qaeda they’re not. Without the assistance of the agent who entrapped them, they would never have dreamed of committing political violence, nor would they have had the slightest idea about where to acquire plastic explosives or a Stinger missile. That didn’t stop prosecutors from acting as if they’d captured Osama bin Laden himself. Noted the Los Angeles Times:

Prosecutors called it the latest in a string of homegrown terrorism plots hatched after Sept. 11.”It’s hard to envision a more chilling plot,” Assistant U.S. Atty. Eric Snyder said in court Thursday. He described all four suspects as “eager to bring death to Jews.”

Actually, it’s hard to imagine a stupider, less competent, and less important plot. The four losers were ensnared by a creepy FBI agent who hung around the mosque in upstate New York until he found what he was looking for. Here’s the New York Times account:

Salahuddin Mustafa Muhammad, the imam at the mosque where the authorities say the confidential informant first encountered the men, said none of the men were active in the mosque. …Mr. Cromitie was there last June, and he met a stranger.

He had no way of knowing that the stranger’s path to the mosque began in 2002, when he was arrested on federal charges of identity theft. He was sentenced to five years’ probation, and became a confidential informant for the F.B.I. He began showing up at the mosque in Newburgh around 2007, Mr. Muhammad said.

The stranger’s behavior aroused the imam’s suspicions. He invited other worshipers to meals, and spoke of violence and jihad, so the imam said he steered clear of him.

“There was just something fishy about him,” Mr. Muhammad said. Members “believed he was a government agent.”

Mr. Muhammad said members of his congregation told him the man he believed was the informant offered at least one of them a substantial amount of money to join his “team.”

So a creepy thug buttonholes people at a mosque, foaming at the mouth about violence and jihad? This is law enforcement? Just imagine if someone did this at a local church, or some synagogue. And the imam says the people “believed he was a government agent.”

Preying on these losers, none of whom were apparently actual Muslims, the “confidential informant” orchestrated the acquisition of a disabled Stinger missile to shoot down military planes and cooked up a wild scheme about attacking a Jewish center in the Bronx.

It gets even more pathetic:

The only one of the four suspects who appears to have aroused any suspicion was Payen, a Haitian native who attended the Newburgh mosque. Assistant imam Hamid Rashada said his dishevelment and odd behavior disturbed some members, said the assistant imam, Hamid Rashada.When Payen appeared in court, defense attorney Marilyn Reader described him as “intellectually challenged” and on medication for schizophrenia. The Associated Press said that when he was asked if he understood the proceedings, Payen replied: “Sort of.”

Despite the pompous statements from Mayor Bloomberg of New York and other politicians, including Representative Peter King, the whole story is bogus. The four losers may have been inclined to violence, and they may have harbored a virulent strain of anti-Semitism. But it seems that the informant whipped up their violent tendencies and their hatred of Jews, cooked up the plot, incited them, arranged their purchase of weapons, and then had them busted. To ensure that it made headlines, the creepy informant claimed to be representing a Pakistani extremist group, Jaish-e Muhammad, a bona fide terrorist organization. He wasn’t, of course.

It is disgusting and outrageous that the FBI is sending provocateurs into mosques.

The headlines reinforce the very fear that Dick Cheney is trying to stir up. The story strengthens the narrative that the “homeland” is under attack. It’s not. As I’ve written repeatedly, since 9/11 not a single American has even been punched in the nose by an angry Muslim, as far as I can tell. Plot after plot — the destruction of the Brooklyn Bridge! bombing the New York Subways! taking down the Sears Tower! bombing the Prudential building in Newark! — proved to be utter nonsense.

The myth of suitcase nukes exposed

Suitcase nuclear weapons? Probably a myth

Hollywood, Congress stoke fears of weapon; experts doubt their existence

11.10.07 / AP

WASHINGTON – Members of Congress have warned about the dangers of suitcase nuclear weapons. Hollywood has made television shows and movies about them. Even the Federal Emergency Management Agency has alerted Americans to a threat — information the White House includes on its Web site.

But government experts and intelligence officials say such a threat gets vastly more attention than it deserves. These officials said a true suitcase nuke would be highly complex to produce, require significant upkeep and cost a small fortune.

Counterproliferation authorities do not completely rule out the possibility that these portable devices once existed. But they do not think the threat remains.

“The suitcase nuke is an exciting topic that really lends itself to movies,” said Vahid Majidi, the assistant director of the FBI’s Weapons of Mass Destruction Directorate. “No one has been able to truly identify the existence of these devices.”

Majidi and other government officials say the real threat is from a terrorist who does not care about the size of his nuclear detonation and is willing to improvise, using a less deadly and sophisticated device assembled from stolen or black-market nuclear material.

Yet Hollywood has seized on the threat. For example, the Fox thriller “24” devoted its entire last season to Jack Bauer’s hunt for suitcase nukes in Los Angeles.

Government officials have played up the threat, too.

Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., once said at a hearing that he thought the least likely threat was from an intercontinental ballistic missile. “Perhaps the most likely threat is from a suitcase nuclear weapon in a rusty car on a dock in New York City,” he said.

In a FEMA guide on terrorist disasters that is posted in part on the White House’s Web site, the agency warns that terrorists’ use of a nuclear weapon would “probably be limited to a single smaller ‘suitcase’ weapon.”

“The strength of such a weapon would be in the range of the bombs used during World War II. The nature of the effects would be the same as a weapon delivered by an intercontinental missile, but the area and severity of the effects would be significantly more limited,” the paper says.

The genie that escaped
During the 1960s, intelligence agencies received reports from defectors that Soviet military intelligence officers were carrying portable nuclear devices in suitcases.

The threat was too scary to stay secret, government officials said, and word leaked out. The genie was never put back in the bottle.

But current and former government officials who have not spoken out publicly on the subject acknowledge that no U.S. officials have seen a Soviet-made suitcase nuke.

The idea of portable nuclear devices was not a new one.

In the 1950s and 1960s, the U.S. made the first ones, known as the Special Atomic Demolition Munition. It was a “backpack nuke” that could be used to blow up dams, tunnels or bridges. While one person could lug it on his back, it had to be placed by a two-man team.

These devices never were used and now exist — minus their explosive components — only in a museum.

Following the U.S. lead, the Soviets are believed to have made similar nuclear devices.

Suitcase nukes have been a separate problem. They attracted considerable public attention in 1997, thanks to a “60 Minutes” interview and other public statements from retired Gen. Alexander Lebed, once Russia’s national security chief.

Lebed said the separatist government in Chechnya had portable nuclear devices, which led him to create a commission to get to the bottom of the Chechen arsenal, according to a Center for Nonproliferation Studies report. He said that when he ran the security service, the commission could find only 48 of 132 devices.

The numbers varied as he changed his story several times — sometimes he stated that 100 or more were missing. The Russians denied he was ever accurate.

Even more details emerged in the summer of 1998, when former Russian military intelligence officer Stanislav Lunev — a defector in the U.S. witness protection program — wrote in his book that Russian agents were hiding suitcase nukes around the U.S. for use in a possible future conflict.

“I had very clear instructions: These dead-drop positions would need to be for all types of weapons, including nuclear weapons,” Lunev testified during a congressional hearing in California in 2000, according to a Los Angeles Times account.

Naysayers noted that he was never able to pinpoint any specific location.

In a 2004 interview with the Kremlin’s Federal News Service, Colonel-General Viktor Yesin, former head of the Russian strategic rocket troops, said he believes that Lebed’s commission may have been misled by mock-ups of special mines used during training.

Yesin believed that a true suitcase nuke would be too expensive for most countries to produce and would not last more than several months because the nuclear core would decompose so quickly. “Nobody at the present stage seeks to develop such devices,” he asserted.

Some members of Congress remained convinced that the suitcase nuke problem persists. Perhaps chief among these lawmakers was Curt Weldon, a GOP representative from Pennsylvania who lost his seat in 2006.

Weldon was known for carrying around a mock-up of a suitcase nuke made with a briefcase, foil and a pipe. But it was nowhere near the weight of an actual atomic device.

Majidi joined the FBI after leading Los Alamos National Laboratory’s prestigious chemistry division. He uses science to make the case that suitcase nukes are not a top concern.

First, he defines what a Hollywood-esque suitcase nuke would look like: a case about 24 inches by 10 inches by 12 inches, weighing less than 50 pounds, that one person could carry. It would contain a device that could cause a devastating blast.

Nuclear devices are either plutonium, which comes from reprocessing the nuclear material from reactors, or uranium, which comes from gradually enriching that naturally found element.

Majidi says it would take about 22 pounds of plutonium or 130 pounds of uranium to create a nuclear detonation. Both would require explosives to set off the blast, but significantly more for the uranium.

Although uranium is considered easier for terrorists to obtain, it would be too heavy for one person to lug around in a suitcase.

Plutonium, he notes, would require the cooperation of a state with a plutonium reprocessing program. It seems highly unlikely that a country would knowingly cooperate with terrorists because the device would bear the chemical fingerprints of that government. “I don’t think any nation is willing to participate in this type of activity,” Majidi said.

That means the fissile material probably would have to be stolen. “It is very difficult for that much material to walk away,” he added.

There is one more wrinkle: Nuclear devices require a lot of maintenance because the material that makes them so deadly also can wreak havoc on their electrical systems.

“The more compact the devices are — guess what? — the more frequently they need to be maintained. Everything is compactly designed around that radiation source, which damages everything over a period of time,” Majidi said.

Proving a negative
A former CIA director, George Tenet, is convinced that al-Qaida wants to change history with the mushroom cloud of a nuclear attack. In 1998, Osama bin Laden issued a statement called “The Nuclear Bomb of Islam.”

“It is the duty of Muslims to prepare as much force as possible to terrorize the enemies of God,” he said.

Among numerous of avenues of investigation after the Sept. 11 attacks, Tenet said in his memoir that President Bush asked Russian President Vladamir Putin whether he could account for all of Russia’s nuclear material. Choosing his words carefully, Tenet said, Putin replied that he could only account for everything under his watch, leaving a void before 2000.

Intelligence officials continued digging deeper, hearing more reports about al-Qaida’s efforts to get a weapon; that effort, it is believed, has been to no avail, so far.

But intelligence officials are loath to dismiss a threat until they are absolutely sure they have gotten to the bottom of it.

In the case of suitcase nukes, one official said, U.S. experts do not have 100 percent certainty that they have a handle on the Russian arsenal.

‘Like SUV-sized’
Laura Holgate, a vice president at the Nuclear Threat Initiative, says the U.S. has not appropriately prioritized its responses to the nuclear threat and, as a result, is poorly using its scarce resources.

Much to many people’s surprise, she noted, highly enriched uranium — outside of a weapon — is so benign that a person can hold it in his hands and not face any ill effects until years later, if at all. It can also slip through U.S. safeguards, she says.

The Homeland Security Department is planning to spend more than $1 billion on radiation detectors at ports of entry. But government auditors found that the devices cannot distinguish between benign radiation sources, such as kitty litter, and potentially dangerous ones, including highly enriched uranium.

Holgate considers the substance the greatest threat because it exists not only at nuclear weapons sites worldwide, but also in more than 100 civilian research facilities in dozens of countries, often with inadequate security.

Her Washington-based nonproliferation organization wants to see the U.S. get a better handle on the material that can be used for bombs — much of it is in Russia — and secure it.

The big problem, she said, is not a fancy suitcase nuke, but rather a terrorist cell with nuclear material that has enough knowledge to make an improvised device.

How big would that be? “Like SUV-sized. Way bigger than a suitcase,” she said.