How humans have genetically programmed incentives to get into a herd mentality

How to control a herd of humans

2.4.09 / David Robson / New Scientist

Read our related editorial: The Obama factor, revealed

HITLER and Mussolini both had the ability to bend millions of people to their fascist will. Now evidence from psychology and neurology is emerging to explain how tactics like organised marching and propaganda can work to exert mass mind control.

Scott Wiltermuth of Stanford University in California and colleagues have found that activities performed in unison, such as marching or dancing, increase loyalty to the group. “It makes us feel as though we’re part of a larger entity, so we see the group’s welfare as being as important as our own,” he says.

Wiltermuth’s team separated 96 people into four groups who performed these tasks together: listening to a song while silently mouthing the words, singing along, singing and dancing, or listening to different versions of the song so that they sang and danced out of sync. In a later game, when asked to decide whether to stick with the group or strive for personal gain, those in the non-synchronised group behaved less loyally than the rest (Psychological Science, vol 20, p 1).

Psychologist Jonathan Haidt at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville thinks this research helps explain why fascist leaders, amongst others, use organised marching and chanting to whip crowds into a frenzy of devotion to their cause, though these tactics can be used just as well for peace, he stresses. Community dances and group singing can ease local tension, for example – a theory he plans to test experimentally (Journal of Legal Studies, DOI: 10.1086/529447).

Meanwhile, the powerful unifying effects of propaganda images are being explored by Charles Seger at Indiana University at Bloomington. His team primed students with pictures of their university – college sweatshirts or the buildings themselves – then asked how highly they scored on different emotions, such as pride or happiness. The primed students gave a strikingly similar emotional profile, in contrast with non-primed students (Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.004).

Interest in the idea of a herd mentality has been renewed by work into mirror neurons – cells that fire when we perform an action or watch someone perform a similar action. It suggests that our brains are geared to mimic our peers. “We are set up for ‘auto-copy’,” says Haidt.

Interest in the idea of a herd mentality has been renewed by research into mirror neurons

Neurological evidence seems to back this idea. Vasily Klucharev, at the Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging in Nijmegen, the Netherlands, found that the brain releases more of the reward chemical dopamine when we fall in line with the group consensus (Neuron, vol 61, p 140). His team asked 24 women to rate more than 200 women for attractiveness. If a participant discovered their ratings did not tally with that of the others, they tended to readjust their scores. When a woman realised her differing opinion, fMRI scans revealed that her brain generated what the team dubbed an “error signal”. This has a conditioning effect, says Klucharev: it’s how we learn to follow the crowd.

Read our related editorial: The Obama factor, revealed

Windmills: They can be used for ELF mind control broadcasts

Source

Wind mills to get free energy…

I don’t like them because:

- They pollute the eye sight and the landscape

- They use free space

- They can be used as GSM masts and mind-control antennas

- They can cause headaches

- they are dangerous when accidents occur.

see for a picture:

http://www.andybell.ch/images/usa_wc/palm_springs_wind_mills.jpg

BTW:

What happens when a wind mill taps energy from the wind/weather ?

Answer 1: The turbine (a big magnet within) is rotating, let’s say between 1 to 100 rotations per second;

then, what do we have created with it then when it is windy ?

Answer 2: An electro-magnetic field pulsing magnetic and thus electromagnetic waves of 1 to 100 Hertz around the located environment with an enormous powerbase.

What can be done with this ?

1) It can amplify and transmit frequencies with gigantic power.

2) phase modulation and modification to brainwaves.

3) The rotation can be maximized between 7.4 and 12 rotations/sec (Hertz) or other frequency bands likely between 1 and 100 Hertz; so, what is a wind mill ?

exactly: an ELF transmitting device powered by the weather.

Is this to much paranoia ?

I don’t think so.

The Silent Massacre, Part 2: Electronic Torture & Mind Control in America and Law Enforcement Complicity

The Silent Massacre, Part 2: Electronic Mind Control in America and Law Enforcement Complicity

3.14.09 / Nicholas Kirtland / Educate-Yourself.org

[ESMC = Electronic Stalking and Mind Control]

Deception

The attackers, or handlers, use deception to reinforce mind control. Many of the physical symptoms that handlers cause in targets are merely deceptions. When a victim is struck with ESMC, he first believes that the objective is to torture him physically. Although the handlers gleefully apply the torture techniques, their real objective is mind control. Through voice-to-skull contact, the handlers can manipulate the target without the target being aware of it.

Local handlers will probably not be highly trained in deception, which means that the handlers are probably not local. If that is the case, the handlers will very likely be employees of national intelligence, the military, or companies, universities, and private labs that provide technology to our government or foreign governments – fulltime and occupational handlers. However, wealthy individuals, religious groups, and other organizations could possibly have gotten access to that secret technology by now. If that is true, the local handlers could possibly be adequately trained.

Quite a few correspondents who have been targeted and who communicated telepathically with the handler perverts stated that the handlers sometimes attempted to convince them to cooperate with them. In several cases, the handlers have tried to convert the targets into good “Christians,” which, considering the cruelty and unlawfulness of those “Christians,” is a real joke. In my case, the handlers often show me holographic pictures of a man in robes who is generally believed by Christians to be Jesus and tell me that I am going to hell. Again, that is total deception.

A whistleblower who worked with the U. S. National Security Agency (NSA) under a defense contract wrote in an internet article:
(http://educate-yourself.org/mc/nsamindcontrolandpsyops20aug99.shtml)

“. . . the subject is unknowingly given hypnosis while the subject is completely awake and is tortured and punished with this hypnosis into a predetermined behavior by the National Security Agency. . . . . the behavior is usually extremely religious, is called ‘reborn’ by the church, with the subject’s life-long goal of ‘a personal relationship with Jesus Christ.’” The NSA uses this technology [electronic torture and mind control] to resocialize (brainwash) the US civilian . . . population.”

That aim may be the link between the government and Fundamentalist preachers. It is worthwhile noting that many Christian churches today receive government grants, an act once believed to violate the principle of separation of church and state, which began in the 1970’s. When I ask TIs to describe their symptoms, when those symptoms began, and their general physical environment, they very often mention that a Fundamentalist minister lives next door, across the street, or very nearby. A law enforcement officer will also often live very close.

I can tell the reader that the handlers themselves are most definitely NOT real Christians and could not possibly be truly religious in any fashion. Yet, they deceptively try to give that appearance. Handlers will also try to convince the targets that they are of particular ethnic groups, e.g., Latinos, East Indians, Afro-Americans. They reinforce that deception through “wrong number” telephone calls posing as persons of those ethnic groups. I continually get “wrong number” calls from black- and Latino-sounding people from various area codes in the United States.

The handlers also deceive through playing “good cop-bad cop.” Often my handlers deride my work efforts and methods as I carry out home improvement projects. They taunt and belittle me as I work. Then, after a few minutes of blustering and disparaging the activity, one of the perverts will make a very complimentary remark about some aspect of the work. I am supposed to warm up to that individual. To an educated target, their psychology is juvenile. I call it “pre-nursery school psychology.”

Impostors

Impostors flood the internet with misinformation on ESMC to throw victims and researchers off track. Every intelligence agency has an operational section whose aim is to spread false propaganda. The propaganda machine spreads misinformation over the internet through several types of “plants” in the media:

(1) Webmaster “plants” working for the perpetrators use the internet to spread erroneous and misleading information. Those liars pretend that they were abducted by aliens, tormented by people who look like lizards, and subjected to rituals performed by Reptilians. They link ESMC with UFOs. One of the favorite lies is that a group of families called the Illuminati seeks to control the world. More recently, the misinformation agents have convinced many targets that they come from a particular genetic strain or blood line and were thus targeted before or from birth. Many of the TIs who actually believe those things are very well meaning and have been convinced of those inaccurate concepts through voice-to-brain emissions. That is exactly why we call that deception “mind control.”

(2) Internet blogger “plants” strew erroneous material in their online blogs.

(3) TI “plants” in various internet forums write pedantic emails, oftentimes belittling authentic TIs and refer other viewers to lies disseminated in bogus web sites and other locations. Some of those plants relate convincing stories; however, eventually they trip over their many lies and astute TIs can pick them out of the crowd.

(4) Author “plants” also produce misinformation published in on-line articles, in magazines, and even in books about electronic assault and mind control.

Now, not all of the information spread on the internet, in articles and books, and by internet correspondents is false by any means. Even many of the people who spread misinformation and disinformation are very sincere. I do not pretend to be expert in determining which information is false and which is true; however, I have learned that much of it is utter rubbish. Electronic assault and mind control itself is incredible enough without being compounded by deliberate lies disseminated by the ESMC perpetrators.

Let me be perfectly clear. The perpetrators of mind control are NOT aliens from outer space. NOT members of the so-called Illuminati. NOT men who can change to reptiles and lizards and other paranormal shapes. NOT ritualistic sex lords seeking sex slaves. NOT men seeking to wipe out particular blood lines and genetic groups. NOT members of the Masonic Order. And probably NOT seekers of a New World Order. Targets who believe those deceptions have been successfully manipulated by the perpetrators. Know that electronic and mind control assault is performed by evil-minded, cruel, degenerate, two-legged, walking, sub-human sacks of street garbage working either with the government, with the knowledge of the government, or under the protection of the government. In some cases, the government may even be a foreign country conducting assaults by remote on American citizens and residents.

The power brokers behind electronic torture and mind control fear the targets’ networking over the internet. Many bloggers and persons with web sites who encourage an interchange of ideas about ESMC and who are true TIs have been subjected to internet intimidation by having their blogs and web sites deleted or otherwise compromised. Some have had to change the names of their sites several times because of that interference. Keep in mind, however, that some of those same people may actually be accomplices pretending to be harassed. More deception.

Capabilities of Perpetrators of ESMC

The only fact that we know for certain about mind control is the symptoms, or how ESMC manifests itself to the victim. Targeted individuals are well aware of the capabilities of the assailants, but for those readers who may be reading about electronic stalking and mind control for the first time, here are some of them.

(1) Monitor movements. They not only know one’s vehicular movements but they can also view him and follow his movements on his property and even inside his house. Once they “hook” the target with their equipment, they have ready access to the him at all times. Their torture follows the target wherever he goes, even to other states and abroad.

Cell phones may play a role in monitoring a target’s movements. Many TIs trace the origin of their electronic torture and mind control to the early 2000’s, when cell phone usage was becoming increasingly more popular. Cell phones have to be used in the case of gang stalking, which goes right along with ESMC. In fact, the stalkers could not coordinate their harassment against targets without the use of cell phones or some type of walkie-talkie. Cellular phones may even somehow be used with the device that renders the electronics effects on victims. It is known that cell phones carried on one’s person near credit cards can cause those cards to malfunction and wear out quickly. Credit cards are one of the hundreds of items that operate through the RFID (radio frequency identification).

(2) Hear and record one’s conversations along with those with whom one talks. This can be done even in a moving vehicle or while on foot in a rural area. The harassers occasionally record and play back to the victim excerpts of some of those conversations in his brain. The handlers can also record a person’s voice and then simulate that voice.

(3) See through the victim’s eyes. One’s eyes are controlled by his brain; thus, by controlling the victim’s brain, the handlers can also see whatever the victim sees. Not only that but they can also see what he thinks.

(4) View the victim’s body whether it is clothed or not and zoom in on any part or organ of the body, even in the darkness. EKG, CT scans, and MRIs can be performed by remote. The handlers probably use the GPS with directed sound to see and torture the target’s body by remote. NASA has long used similar telescopic instruments for carrying out delicate space operations.

(5) Inject holographic pictures or images into a victim’s thoughts. In my case, the handlers have shown: my son drowning; pictures of what is believed to be images of Jesus; and pictures of family members and friends, sometimes in suggestive poses, and countless numbers of unknown individuals in induced dreams and thoughts. When I pray for my grandchildren, a girl and a boy, the perverted handlers will sometimes show my granddaughter’s school uniform dress flying upward, showing her little panties and legs. Sometimes the pervs show me old photos in black and white, further evidence that the handlers can communicate through my eyes.

6) Apply a variety of torture techniques to the body. Many of those effects may perhaps be accomplished through the use of silent directed sound and various PC software used over the voice-to-brain communication. Others may be psychological or aided by psychological suggestions through the psychopaths’ subliminal talking and whispering into the target’s brain. Those effects include

A) Sensation of pin pricks in the eyes, shoulders, face, feet, elbows, and other areas. The pin prick can be instantaneous or can be prolonged. In my case, the handlers have long caused an enduring pin prick on the rear of my neck. At first I thought that the sensation was an irritation on the neck caused by shirt labels; however, when it kept hurting in the absence of labels, I knew that it was only one of the perverts’ bag of tricks. In addition, the sensation was not in the same location as the shirt labels. They can also cause the entire lower legs to feel like they are being struck by pins. In recent months, they have pin pricked the depths of my auditory canal in my right ear, causing me to shiver violently

B) Restless legs. A sensation begins in the small of the back and extends into the extremities, causing the “restless legs” syndrome. I can feel that sensation coming on as the handlers apply their vibrations to my body. Sometimes when that happens, the legs will jerk involuntarily.

C) Electrical jolts. These affect the entire body and feel much like the shock that one gets from touching a low voltage electrical fence.

D) Tremors, or vibrations. These can affect the whole body or be focused on specific parts of the body. They can range from very mild to violent. (I believe that the jolts and vibrations may partially be pre-hypnotic suggestions causing the target to think that he feels jolts and vibrations whenever the handlers whisper the code word. In other words, those physical effects may instead be psychological effects resulting in physical reactions. I have asked other people to touch my legs and body when they were vibrating, and they felt nothing.) The vibrations can envelop a large area, e.g., a lawn, including the house, or they can narrow down to a very small area, e.g., a target’s stomach or his nose.

E) Zapping in/on the head. These sound much like sparks from a welder’s torch or like children’s sparklers used as fireworks on holidays.

F) Clicking in the ear. (In my case, it is always in the left ear, never in the right one.)

G) Severe cramping, mainly in the calves of the legs.

H) Numbness in the limbs from the base of the spinal column to the toes.

I) Coughing (I can feel an unnatural scratching in the inside of my throat), and sneezing (likewise, I can feel an artificial tickling in the inside of my nostrils).

J) Induced erections, by vibrating very lightly the inside of the urethra and the groin. Those erections usually occur while the handlers whisper the names of friends and relatives, very obviously attempting to cause the target to associate the sexual sensation with those people.

K) Stomach aches and pains, indigestion, nausea, and dizziness.

L) Sodomizing, using some unknown force to probe the anal cavity (perhaps directed sound waves, which cause a strong vibration and can focus on a particular very small area).

M) Lethargy and listlessness. I suspect that many people suffering from Chronic Fatigue Syndrome are actually victims of ESMC.

N) Tinnitus. I had never suffered from tinnitus before the electronic stalking began. It hit me the day the stalking became overt, and I have had that condition ever since then. The tone of the ear ringing changes often in a very notable manner.

O) Iinability to urinate or frequent urination. I had two prostate procedures in 2001, although the prostate was not enlarged, because I had the urge to urinate but could not do so. Now I know that it was the work of the perverts who use the ESMC techniques, for since the handlers became overt in 2005, they have continued making the bladder often seem full. Now I can hear them whispering, “Don’t piss.”

P) Cconstipation. Likewise, I often used to have a problem defecating. Since I have developed an ability to “hear” the handlers’ whispers, I hear them saying, “Don’t shit.” The brain learns over a period of time to react to their commands. However, knowing now what causes the constipation, I am no longer affected by it.

Q) Frequent defecation. The handlers constantly probe my anal cavity and whisper for me to “go shit.” According to other victims, this is a very common symptom. Making victims defecate often is psychological as well as physical, as it humiliates victims and keeps them from leaving home. That particular effect, however, has not adversely affected me. I still control my bowel movements.

R) Sleep deprivation. All of this leads to sleep deprivation, which then becomes a symptom itself. This is designed to weaken the victim’s body as well as his mind and cause him to have motor, household, and other accidents. In addition, it makes the victim more vulnerable to mind control. Conversely, the handlers’ device can also make targets incredibly sleepy and actually cause his eyes to close involuntarily. There appears to be a particular form of vibration that will “wire” the target to keep him awake at night.

S) Sensation of crawling insects on the face and neck.

T) Intense itching. This can be any place on the body. They often will make it seem like a mosquito bite or a fire ant bite. The itching is normally on the hands or the feet.

U) Twitching of the fingers. The perverts not only want to annoy you but also convince you that you are developing Parkinson’s disease.

V) Partial loss of sight. The handlers do something to the eyes that make them feel as if a grain of sand is underneath the eyelid. They also cause pin pricks in the eyes. I have lost much sight in my left eye as a result. I do not wear glasses to read or to drive. Until a few months ago, I could read the TV captions clearly. Now I have to be very close to the TV set to see the captions and I often have double vision and blurred vision, especially in the left eye. In addition, the lips and mouths of speakers on TV are not in sync with their words. I also recently discovered while watching Wheel of Fortune on TV that the movements are likewise not in sync. When the participants in that program spun the wheel, the result on my TV (or in my vision) was about two clicks of the wheel off what they should have been.

W) Throbbing in the head. This has something to do with “mining” the brain or it is part of the psychological conditioning to make the target believe that he must reveal his thoughts.

X) Aches and pains in various parts of the body. I am very physically active; thus, the handlers attempt to cripple my knees and my right arm and hand (I am right handed) to keep me from being able to work. They can also cause arthritic-type pain in the hands, pains in the lower back, and extreme pain in the legs by striking the sciatic nerve.

Y) Salivation. The pervs’ device can cause me to salivate at night while I sleep as well as during the day when I am active. For no reason, spittle will sometimes seep from the corner of my mouth.
Z) Tingling vibration focused on the outside of the right side of the nostril (it can, of course, focus on any location). As a result of the vibrations (or perhaps lasering) on that area, a small brown bump has appeared at that location. That bump remains very sensitive and often runs and forms a scab.

AA) Involuntary physical movements. For example, when I type my emails and computer documents, the pervs’ software, which constantly pummels my brain, causes me to reverse certain consonants and vowels, slowing down considerably my typing speed. Other targets have suffered serious falls, when the devices caused their knees to buckle. The handlers’ device can also cause the arms and legs to flail and jerk involuntarily. I have awoken while sleeping when one of my arms flailed into the head board.

BB) Heart flutters and irregular palpitations. In particular, the perverts cause the heart to beat at a far greater than normal rate, or at least they lend the perception that it is beating rapidly through psychological or perhaps post-hypnotic suggestions. The handlers want the target to believe that his heart is overworking and that he may suffer a heart attack, stroke, or chronic heart problems.

CC) Pressure on the bladder, causing the victim to want to urinate very often. Because of that sensation, I underwent two painful and costly prostate procedures with a urologist before I knew the real cause of the problem. The pervs still apply pressure on the bladder; however, now that I know that it is their evil work, it does not bother me.

DD) Sores in various areas. The perverts continually vibrate (or laser) the outside of my right nostril, which remains continually sensitive. That area scabs over, loses its scab, and then scabs over again. A spot has also developed on my chin, where I often feel the tingling of their vibrations (or lasering).

EE) High and sudden temperature rises in the body. Those may be psychologically induced.

The symptoms listed above are some of those that have occurred in my case. Other targeted individuals may have experienced other symptoms, perhaps in addition to those I have listed. Just as the groups of handlers differ, so do the symptoms that those handlers cause.

Curiously, in the 1990’s I discovered one day that the muscles in the calves of my legs pulsed unnaturally. There is absolutely no somatic explanation for that strange occurrence. There seems to be no particular pattern to the pulsing. Moreover, weather and other conditions do not seem to affect the pulsations. Some days there is much less noticeable pulsation than other days. I believe that the strange pulsing, which continues to this day, has something to do with the electromagnetic pulsing or frequencies of whatever device is used by the handlers to connect with my mind.

In the same period, I noticed that the tops of both ears had begun to exude a colorless fluid that became crusty. Likewise, there is no physical explanation for that condition, which still continues whether I use sun screen or not. Other victims have mentioned the fluid coming from the tops of the ears. Also, the top of my nose forms a crust. I remove it with a soapy bath cloth one day and the next day it reappears. Sun screen does not prevent its doing that. I do not have particularly sensitive skin.

More recently, I have noticed a white spot about a quarter of an inch in diameter on my chin. Like my nose and ears, that spot becomes covered with a film, except that instead of feeling crusty, it feels soft. The hairs of my beard are thicker and much more numerous in that small area. As the sociopath handlers focus on particular small areas, they may be trying to cause skin cancer or melanoma.

All of the physical effects described above are intended to cause in the target a feeling of helplessness. The target has absolutely no defense against the torture, and his frustration, anger, and anxiety mounts. Nobody believes him. Law enforcement will not investigate his claims. When that scenario develops, the handlers have achieved what they wanted and anticipated.

The electronic jolts and vibrations also affect domestic animals. My handlers can beam their frequencies (or whatever) in broad waves that cover very wide areas, including my yard and the adjoining pasture. My dog, which is an outside pet, is much affected by the electronic assault methods, despite her being in excellent health and getting regular checkups by the veterinarian. She often trembles violently and appears frightened. At times, she pants heavily, gulping for air, and almost collapses. She very often shakes her head as if she is trying to get something out of or off her head. I’ve taken her to the vet twice for that symptom, and he diagnosed her both times with an ear infection and prescribed her medicine. Despite that, after two and a half years, she still shakes her head. My cat, on the other hand, does not seem to be affected by the electronic effects. Gender could not be a factor, as they are both spayed females.

(7) Cause the target financial problems. Keep in mind that most targets live on fixed incomes and most of them have to live frugally. Yet, the handlers employ a bag of tricks designed to drain the target financially by

A) Making the target spend thousands of dollars on remedies and gadgets that supposedly neutralize or ameliorate the effects of ESMC and causing him to hire detectives to investigate the ESMC.

B) Causing the target to make mathematical errors on his taxes and other documents that result in substantial losses.

C) Affecting the target’s judgment that ends in his making faulty and costly decisions.

D) Destroying expensive household and other items, making targets have to replace them. In my case, they have ruined two printers, two blenders, and other household items. Their device, however, can only affect machines that have small motors or batteries. My coffee makers, which have no motor, are not affected.

E) Distracting the target so that he forgets to pay bills on time, leading to his paying penalties.

F) Creating problems with the electrical system and mechanical devices, especially computers and printers, that make targets have to hire technicians to repair. I have had to hire PC technicians several times at from $75 to $140 a visit.

G) Urging the targets through their voice-to-brain whispers to buy expensive, though needless items.

H) Fomenting personal and other problems that require that targets hire lawyers. A TI correspondent wrote about her taking videos of neighbors overtly harassing her and then being arrested for that action. She had to hire a lawyer to get out of jail and is now awaiting trial. Of course, nothing happened to the harassers. Moreover, now that law abiding citizen has an arrest record that will follow her to the grave.

I) Sending targets to hospital emergency rooms due to physical problems they cause with their devices. One TI correspondent rushed to the ER on at least three occasions when the handlers caused her throat to constrict, keeping her from breathing.

J) Ruining the targets’ credit. The manipulators and their accomplices will steal credit card and other statements from the targets’ mail boxes or “lose” them in the postal system, causing targets to pay late fees; by whispering into the targets’ brains, make them forget to pay bills; and interfere with the targets online payments to cause them bill payment problems.

K) Robbing targets of their time by harassing them continually with electronic assault and mind control, thus keeping them from tending to their business affairs. Very often targets lose their jobs because of the ESMC distractions in their lives. I have spent countless hours taking notes, recording them in my journal, corresponding with other TIs, researching on the internet, and trying objects and ways to neutralize the ESMC effects, time that I could have spent on home improvement projects and other useful activities. I am a very able genealogical researcher, and I used to spend hours a day at that pastime. Now I very seldom do family research because of the many distractions that affect my concentration.

Causing targets financial ruin is one of the aims of the handlers. Many of the targets with whom I have corresponded have depleted their savings and have gone into bankruptcy because of the perverts. Others have become virtually street people. The handlers set out to break targets financially, and they often do.

(8) Knock out and interfere with the function of battery-operated or electrical household items. In my case, the handlers have changed radio stations, caused halogen flashlights to blink and go out, caused the tiny lights in a fingerprint reader used for PC security to quiver, disabled my new printer so many times that it is no longer usable, caused interference in TV programs, made mechanical grasscutters stop functioning, ruined batteries in multiple flashlights, burned out electrical wall outlets, caused microwaves not to function, caused two almost new blenders to quit functioning, burned out watch batteries while the watch was on my wrist, and changed the functions of certain keys on the keyboard of the computer – all by remote. Their device can even cause the ink in pens to congeal or dry up so that the pens will not write. All of this suggests that the pervs use directed silent sound beamed in by a radio frequency and guided by the GPS.

(9) Manipulate the target’s computer and telephones. By hacking the computer and tapping the phones, the handlers are able to interfere with the target’s communication system and thus harm his relationships with family members and friends. One of the chief aims of the handlers is to totally isolate the target from society.

(10) Discredit the target by making him appear insane or demented. They will also spread rumors about the target designed to isolate him. Those rumors will usually suggest that the target is a drug pusher or user, a child molester (one of their favorites), a wife-beater, a common whore, a rip-off artist, a closet drunkard, a white collar thief, and others. In addition to socially isolating the target, the handlers also seek to cause the target anxiety and other psychological problems that drive him to a psychiatrist, who then diagnoses him as schizophrenic. The handlers know that once the target sees a psychiatrist and it becomes a matter of record, the target’s sanity becomes an issue. Afterward, whatever the target says will be treated as suspect. This is important to the handlers, as they know that the target will be discredited if he seeks out law enforcement. The handlers will also send duplicate emails, change words in your emails, and resend emails days after the original to your correspondents to make you appear crazy.

(11) Register the target’s emotions. Their software allows them to use the target’s pulse rate and probably other methods to record emotions such as anxiety, panic, fear, frustration, anger, sadness, loneliness, and others. The emotions actually appear in the form of words that surface in your thoughts, e.g., frustration, loneliness. In addition, the perverts continually whisper those words into your brain to actually cause those emotions. Handlers prepare loop play tapes of whispers whose design is to play on the target’s emotions. (More about whispers later.)

(12) Transmit voices into the brain that only the victim can hear. When I first heard the voices, I was driving in Texas not far from the Mexican border. The radio was turned off, as it normally is when I drive. The voices seemed to come from near the driver’s door side panel. My first thought was that a device, or a bug, had been planted in the vehicle and was somehow being used to project the voices. A sweep of the vehicle by a private detective the following day did not reveal a bug. Still, it took me a couple of more days to realize that the voices were coming through my brain.

The perpetrators of mind control are very methodical and deliberate. Trainers of the handlers must have studied a very detailed training manual. At first, the handlers normally only call the victims ugly names, then they gradually begin to talk directly to the victim. Over time the victim learns that he can also talk to them. Finally, the two parties establish a dialogue albeit in an acrimonious fashion. Once I found out that I could also “speak” to the sickos telepathically, I used that ability to ridicule, taunt, and demean them.

Every target who is electronically harassed by remote wherever he goes is also subjected to mind control, often without his knowledge. Whether the target realizes it or not, his brain is being continually hammered twenty-four hours a day by at least two levels of voices. Those voices may be projected “aloud” (telepathically) or in whispers. One is an underlying loop play tape of recorded voices telling him that he is crazy, making deviant sexual suggestions, and deprecating the victim in many other ways. Another layer of voices are the actual handlers hammering away at the “crazy” theme, telling him lies about family and friends, and attempting to keep him from engaging in any meaningful activities. WITHOUT THE VOICES, MIND CONTROL CANNOT BE ACCOMPLISHED.

The handlers normally disguise their voices. Simulations can easily be made by computer programs readily available almost anywhere. Moreover, various handlers will alternate using the same voices; thus, causing the target to think that the same three or four voices that he hears are monitoring him twenty-four hours a day. In fact, oftentimes there is only one handler using three or four different simulated voices.

The amazing mind control tactics of Alcoholics Anonymous

Mind Control Tactics Of Alcoholics Anonymous

6.2002 / Devin Sexson / More Revealed

In deciding whether or not our beloved alcoholism cure “Alcoholics Anonymous” is a cult, it is important to come up with a definition of the word “cult.” The word itself tends to draw controversy. When any particular group is labeled a cult the term is hotly disputed by members, supporters, and sympathizers with the organization. There are exceptions to this–the most notorious of cults are not likely to be defended. These would be Charles Manson’s Family, Jim Jones’ Peoples Temple, Heaven’s Gate, and the like. These are the examples that often come to mind when the term “cult” is used. These are the most extreme examples of a destructive cult and mind-control organization. On the other hand, the loosest definition of the word is likely to label an innocuous group of model railroad enthusiasts a cult.

The specific definition that I’m using to describe the cultic properties of AA is the BITE model that has been developed by Steve Hassan. Cult expert Hassan is the author of “Combating Mind Control” and “Releasing The Bonds: Empowering People to Think for Themselves,” two highly acclaimed books dealing with the issues of mind-control, spiritual responsibility, and exit counseling for ex-cult members. The BITE model is used as a guideline to determine what extent a particular group practices mind-control tactics for the purpose of diminishing a member’s personal identity. The acronym stands for Behavior, Information, Thoughts, and Emotions. In examining an organization we can look at these four categories and consider how, why and to what extent these aspects are controlled by the group, in order to determine its level of mind-control over the members.

I consider the BITE model to be a very useful tool in defining cult-like characteristics because it creates a clear distinction between groups that may be dangerous and lead to behavior and ideas that are destructive, and groups that provide real benefit for their members and ultimately our society. Being able to look at an organization and determine the level of mind-control that is being used within it helps us to know how to deal with that organization on a societal level when exercising political activism against destructive cults. It also enables us to determine the best methods to assist those who have been victimized by them.

Hassan himself does not consider Alcoholics Anonymous an organization that fits the BITE model. He credits AA for providing a great service to those who have found relief from alcoholism through the organization. He agrees that AA is not suitable for all people, is potentially destructive for some members, and that alternative programs may be more beneficial.

Having been a member of AA for many years, I have a different view of it. I consider the program of Alcoholics Anonymous a destructive cult that uses all methods of mind-control tactics for the specific purposes of incorporating its members into a belief system that demolishes their individuality, crushes their independence, and creates numerous psychologically damaging side effects. I will discuss the aspects of AA as they relate to each category of the BITE model, but first I will discuss AA as it is presented to the general public to help explain why this issue is disputed with such adamancy on both sides.

Alcoholics Anonymous has been known as the program that has saved the lives of millions of people who are suffering from the disease of alcoholism. There is no shortage of people who will testify to having been at the edge of death from years of over-consumption of alcohol. After finding refuge in the program of AA they have experienced nothing short of a miraculous transformation. They will tell you that they would surely be dead if not for AA. AA meetings are free of charge, widely available, and the only requirement for membership is the desire to stop drinking. The program of AA is based on the idea of one alcoholic helping another, mutually supportive of one another. There is a camaraderie, understanding, and acceptance that can only come from those who have been there and done that. The program has spread around the world. They claim to have over two million members. The structure of the program contains no leadership; it is maintained by adherence to the 12 traditions of Alcoholics Anonymous, and a spirit of cooperation amongst its membership.

The program of AA is based on the 12 steps, which are suggested as a program of recovery. These 12 steps have been adapted to fit numerous other organizations for the purposes of overcoming problems with addiction to drugs, sex, gambling, overeating, smoking, and many more. There are hundreds of books about using the 12 steps in daily living. They are advocated by just about every author of popular psychology books, every TV talk show host, 90% of addiction treatment centers, the United States court system, and the 12-Step programs are almost always praised in the mainstream media. There is no doubt that AA has made a good name for itself with the public since its formation in 1935. Most people who have no experience with the 12-step programs accept the dominant opinion of our society and consider it to be a good thing.

AA is not known for many of the things that we think of as making a cult. AA members are not going to commit mass suicide, they don’t sell flowers in airports, they don’t go door-to-door, they do not live communally, stockpile weapons, or dress in distinctive attire. These are aspects of the most recognizable cultic groups but not things that are typical of all of them. But one can still be a victim of mind-control tactics without it being that obvious on the surface, as the majority of cult members are.

It should be pointed out that AA exists in different forms. Public AA usually consists of meetings and a tight-knit social group. AA treatment is a facility where people live for a short period of time, usually 1-3 months. There are some inpatient 12-step treatment programs that can last up to a year or more. There is a wide range of involvement with the program from intensely strict communal living arrangements to an occasional meeting and very little time and energy dedicated to the program. The frequency of AA meetings depends on the population of the community. In a large city there are many different meetings to choose from and they go from early morning to late at night. Even very small rural communities usually have a weekly AA meeting. Some meetings are called “open” meetings–anyone is free to attend them. There are also “closed” meetings, which are restricted to those who have a problem with alcohol, and a desire to stop drinking. In analyzing AA as it relates to the BITE model, I’m going to concentrate on the most common form of AA, the publicly held meetings. I am also limiting my discussion to Alcoholics Anonymous, and setting aside all the other 12-step programs that have grown out of the original program of AA.

Considering the program that I have described, it may seem absurd to be critical toward such a thing. Why would anyone object? Even if it’s not as effective as they like to portray it as being, it couldn’t hurt, right? No, actually it can and it does.
ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS AND BEHAVIOR CONTROL

Steve Hassan has drawn up a list of criteria that constitutes behavior control. The first aspect of behavioral control that is addressed is the limitation of a person’s physical reality. This includes where the person lives, what they eat, how their time is spent, and what they wear.

Before analyzing the level of behavioral control it is important to look at the people who enter AA in the first place. These are usually people who have experienced a tremendous amount of suffering as the result of alcohol dependency. They are likely to have had legal problems, relationship problems, health problems, lack of mental stability, financial problems, etc. They may have come to AA from jail, the hospital, or a treatment program. They may have done it as a result of pressure from friends and family, or work; some are mandated by court order to attend AA. Chemical dependency does cause a great deal of misery in peoples’ lives. Some become utterly desperate and go to AA after being told that it is the only way they can be helped. Unlike almost every other cult, nobody joins it because they think it might be fun and a good opportunity to meet some interesting new people.

In the examining and evaluating the level of behavioral control in a group situation, it is best to create a model of comparison. What freedom of behavior do I now have that I did not have as a member of AA? Outside of the organization, I’m still bound by society’s laws and expectations, my personal obligations, my own physical and mental limitations, but I do have a much greater degree of personal freedom than I did as a member of AA.

I will describe the process that a person could expect at their first meeting. Bear in mind that the usual situation for new members is that they are people who have problems and are seeking relief from their situation. Someone who is newly sober will not be thinking clearly. These people are very suggestible and often desperate and very vulnerable. The meetings are very ritualistic: there are certain traditions that are almost never deviated from. Steve Hassan starts the description of behavior control with the regulation of individual’s personal reality. The use of rituals that are engaged in by all those surrounding the individual is a highly effective way of controlling the person’s behavior and defining the physical reality for this person. Each meeting starts with a moment of silence followed by the Serenity Prayer. The entire group almost always participates in this ritual, heads bowed and chanting in unison. This is followed by a reading from the basic text titled “Alcoholics Anonymous” commonly referred to as “The Big Book.” This reading contains the 12 steps, which are the basic structure of the program. The 12 traditions, which are guidelines that each group is expected to follow, are then read aloud.

At every meeting the group is asked if there are any celebrations for specific periods of time sober, if there are any visitors from out of town, and if there is anyone attending his or her first meeting. Every member uses the specific format: “My name is Joe, and I’m an alcoholic.” This is always followed by the group response “Hi Joe!” At this point, a newcomer may introduce him or herself; they will likely be greeted with much enthusiasm and encouragement. The newcomer is assumed to be part of the organization. As a welcomed member of the group they are then given instructions as to what specific behaviors are expected of them. Establishing ritual creates the first step in further control over the person’s behavior.

The usual recommendation is to attend 90 meetings in 90 days and get a sponsor as soon as possible. Granted, there is no way to make sure that a newcomer actually does this, unless there is some kind of legal order to do so. The way it is done is through a form of peer pressure. At this point one is either going to become a full member of AA or one who just comes by occasionally or abandons the group altogether after a period of time. One who becomes a full member will take the suggestions seriously. One who is not willing to participate on that level will never be completely accepted into the group. There is a very clear separation between those who are peripheral members and those who are in the inner circle.

“Are you in AA or around AA?” This is the standard slogan that is used to encourage people to become more involved with the program. If you are going to be “in AA” you will go to those 90 meeting in 90 days and you will get your AA sponsor to guide you in the program. The mindset of the newcomer is highly based on fear. The memory of the mental anguish and often life-threatening situations of active addiction is fresh; the idea of returning to such a state of existence can be terrifying. Out of fear, the newcomer will feel compelled to seek relief. It is the old-timers who control the dominant discourse in the meetings, usually authoritarian, dogmatic, manipulative and aggressive. They are easy to recognize in any meeting. They will state the number of years they have been sober in the program, and they will admonish any newcomers who say something that is inconsistent with the tenets of AA with a condescending comment. Sometimes just a glare, a cough, or grunt is all it takes to let the group know that what was just said was “wrong.” The message is clear; if you don’t want to relapse into active addiction, you will do as we say.

The member’s behavior is guided by fear. Every single day for a period of three months new members go to an hour-long AA meeting. The newcomer is expected to ask a more experienced member “Will you be my sponsor?” This establishes the new member as being inferior, less knowledgeable and needy. The newcomer is demeaned and humiliated by this act. The sponsor is tacitly elected to control the new person’s life to whatever degree is tolerated. The degree to which a sponsor will dictate someone’s behavior varies greatly. There are some who are very demanding: they develop every aspect of behavior that is associated with cult gurus. I knew one who insisted that his male followers wear short haircuts and suits, and one who insisted on eight meetings a week, no matter how long the member has been in the program. Typically a sponsor will insist on very frequent meetings. The sponsor will usually require regular phone contact, reading and discussion of all AA materials. All this person’s extra time will be consumed with the program. It is not uncommon for a member to have no social life outside of the group.

Not all AA members follow this scenario. This is the encouraged path. This is what is expected to be part of the “in” group. Those members who do not get a sponsor, do not attend meetings frequently, do not pay attention to the literature, are never fully accepted into the fold.

Hassan’s second and third aspects of behavioral control are major time committed to indoctrination, and the need to ask permission for major decisions. In AA the frequent meeting attendance, time spent with the sponsor and at social gatherings, and the amount of time spent reading and learning the program amount to a major portion of the member’s life. And there are certain things that are suggested by the sponsor, and in dominant discourse in the meetings, concerning major life decisions. A new member is told to place recovery as their first priority. They are told not to get involved in an intimate relationship, change jobs, get divorced, stop smoking, move to a different city, or make any major decisions for the first year of recovery. Unemployed newcomers are told not to worry about getting a job but to concentrate on recovery and go to lots of meetings. In some cases a sponsor will become dangerously controlling and attempt to manage every aspect of a person’s life. The sponsor is the mentor, to whom all information is divulged. The fifth step in AA is to confess “the exact nature of our wrongs.” This is the next aspect of behavioral control in the BITE model, reporting thoughts, feelings and activities to superiors. Those members of the group who have been around longer and have more time sober are considered to be superiors. There is an unstated hierarchy that naturally develops.

AA claims the lack of specific leaders as evidence that it is not a cult. Since co-founder Bill Wilson died in 1971, there has not been a specific leader of AA who can be called by name. That does not mean that they don’t exist. Leaders do exist; in every meeting there are the cult gurus. These are usually middle-aged males. They tend to be conservative, authoritarian, narrow minded, and dogmatic. They consider the things that they say in meetings to be of the utmost importance. The members respond to their words as if they were some kind of profound wisdom. It is these gurus who decide who is and who is not accepted into the fold.

Hassan’s last four aspects of behavioral control are rewards and punishments for purposes of behavior modification, groupthink prevails over individualism, rigid rules, and a need for obedience and dependency. With AA, as with any other cult, these aspects don’t apply as much to the members who are on the edge of the group. When someone is taken into the fold, acceptance from the group becomes a very important issue for them. The old timers shun and ignore those who are not eager to become involved. A member’s ability and willingness to accept the group’s doctrine will be easily identifiable; they will use the AA slogans, quote from the literature frequently, and they will not express independent ideas. Their responses become very predictable. These people become obsessively dedicated to “working the program.” They develop a worshipful attitude toward the old-timers, indiscriminately believing everything they are told by those with more time in AA. If someone goes against the prevailing attitudes in the group, they will be told that they will relapse as a result. They develop a superstitious fear of saying anything critical toward the program. There is a strong encouragement to associate only with other members. It is very common for someone to limit their social group exclusively to AA members. This impacts who they choose as a roommate, where they live, where they work, who they chose as an intimate partner, and every other aspect of a person’s life. The obsession with the program can get to the point where an indoctrinated member thinks and talks about nothing but AA.

New members become convinced that they must conform to the expectations of the group. The primary tactic used to control behavior is fear. Those who do not do as they are told and believe the dogma will suffer a terrible fate; they relapse and then they die. The behavior of the newcomer is dictated by the induced phobia of relapse and death. These people are led to believe that their lives are fully dependent on the program. The sponsors make the rules on an individual basis; the old-timers are in charge of the group dynamics. Anyone expressing criticism toward the program is countered with condescending remarks, ridicule or hostility. Anyone who openly questions or disagrees with the prevailing group discourse will not be accepted into the inner circle. They may remain on the edge of AA, but will never truly become part of the group. These people will inevitably leave the program altogether.

In looking at my life after my involvement with the cult in comparison to my life as a member of the cult, I clearly see a difference in the level of freedom I have over my own behavior. I am not one who would choose to participate in a group prayer; I am not inclined to choose someone as a spiritual guide or mentor. I never went to those meetings because I enjoyed them, I attended out of fear of relapsing and dying. While I was in the cult my social group consisted almost entirely of members of the organization. I now socialize with a diverse group of people and engage in a wide variety of activities. I do not have to set aside time to attend meetings or social functions. I am free to discuss any topic I want to. The primary difference concerning behavior is that my time is my own. I have no obligation to attend these meetings, social events, or conventions. I don’t have to worry about that phone call, “Haven’t seen you at a meeting in a while, are you all right?” That’s right, “Big Sponsor” is watching you.

I would not refrain from making any major decisions in my life for any period of time. I do not consider anyone to be the vehicle of sublime wisdom. I do not feel the need to or see the advantage of engaging in a ritualized confession. I do not depend on anyone to tell me what to read, think about, believe, or do. There is an incredible amount of control that is gained over people’s lives when they are convinced that they have a deadly disease and they will die unless they do what they told. I have discovered that I am able to live my life without being guided by fear and the result is freedom.

ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS AND INFORMATION CONTROL

The categories and sub-categories in Steve Hassan’s BITE model are very clear and specific. This has been greatly beneficial to me in my continuing insight about how I got caught up in this particular cult. The first sub-category under information control is the use of deception. Examples of this are, deliberately holding back information, distorting information to make it more acceptable, and outright lying.

In AA there are a multitude of things that you will not hear about: these things are suppressed. You will never hear about alternative methods of recovery, except in very derogatory context. The sexual, psychological, and physical abuse that takes place in AA is never talked about. Scientific advances in the treatment of alcoholism are never brought up. The fact that it has been shown that the program often does more harm than good for a great many people will never be discussed.

AA describes itself as “the program that has saved the lives of millions of alcoholics.” One thing that they are never clear about is the actual rate of recovery. Since the members of the program are anonymous and no records are kept on anyone, reliable statistics are scarce. The studies that have been done in order to determine the actual number of AA members who achieve long-term abstinence from alcohol show a range from 2-5%. The number of addicted people who achieve remission without any program at all is about 70% according to NLAES (National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemological Survey).

AA is said to be a “spiritual, not religious” program. This is a gross manipulation of words, just to make the program more acceptable to newcomers. A good way to see the clear distortion of information is to compare AA’s promotional literature with their official basic text and the dominant discourse that takes place among the members. AA’s promotional literature claims, “there is room in AA for people of all shades of belief and disbelief.” The Big Book states, “to live life on a spiritual basis or face an alcoholic death are not easy alternative to face.” In the meetings a commonly heard slogan is, “work the steps or die.” This is one of a multitude of examples of how the promotional literature that one finds in AA pamphlets or magazine articles shows AA as an easy-going loosely defined fellowship. But the Big Book of AA paints a picture of grave warnings and death threats. It is obsessively religious and claims to be about hope and inspiration for the alcoholic, but is filled with dark and morbid overtones. The information that goes out to the public is clearly designed to make AA look inviting, all accepting, enjoyable, and effective. Once the member is inside, things change. All of the information is geared toward making the member obedient and dependent.

The outright lies of AA exist in abundance at every level, in the promotional literature, the basic texts, and the discourse among the members. AA claims it acquires members by “attraction rather than promotion,” but the court system mandates attendance to their meetings, and the 12th step instructs the members to “carry the message to the alcoholic who still suffers.” AA promotion is found in magazines, newspapers, books, movies, and other sources. It is not uncommon to hear members claim that it is a scientifically proven fact that AA is the only possible way to recover from alcoholism. I have made calls to 12-step based treatment centers and been told that alternative programs to AA do not exist. AA’s promotional literature claims that no alcoholic ever returns to moderate drinking; the truth is that many have. They claim that there is no leadership in AA; actually there is a clear hierarchy that develops in the groups. The groups are as far from democratic as you can get; the old-timers in control demand strict adherence to the dogma. The Big Book makes outrageous statements. One of my favorite examples of an outright lie in this text is, “Since this book was first published, AA has released thousands of alcoholics from asylums and hospitals of every kind. The majority have never returned.” Not only is this untrue, but it was written word for word in the original manuscript, before the book was ever published. The newcomer is told that they have a disease, the disease is deadly and incurable, there is only one possible way to keep from dying of this disease and that is to go to meetings, read the Big Book, get a sponsor and work the steps. This too is a blatant lie. The members of the program are taught to accept these and other lies as absolute, indisputable truth. If one dares to expose these lies for what they are they will not be part of the inner circle of AA. Believing and repeating lies is one of the major expectations of the group.

The steps are said in the Big Book to be only “suggestions,” but these suggestions are read at the beginning of every meeting. A commonly heard slogan is “the steps are suggested like it is suggested that you use a parachute when jumping out of an airplane.” The old-timers talk about working the steps they never speak of using other “suggestions.” They will welcome people by saying that there are no “musts” in the program. Your higher power can be anything you want it to be. Such things as a doorknob, the AA group itself, or a tree are recommended as points to start believing in a power greater that yourself. As one gets into the program the definition of AA’s “higher power” becomes a narrowly defined tyrannical god as AA understands him.

Hassan says a mind-control cult will minimize and discourage non-cult or outside information. In the AA meetings outside information is not just minimized or discouraged, it is forbidden. Only AA conference-approved literature is read, distributed, or discussed at meetings. An AA sponsor will almost always reinforce the limitation to AA literature outside the meetings. Among the members scientific information about alcohol addiction is ridiculed. People who criticize the program are labeled angry and dishonest. Those who question the tenets are considered uninformed and need to go to more meetings to find out what it’s all about. Information that is critical of AA is never considered valid, and will not be discussed objectively. The Big Book is often considered to be “inspired by God.” It is not disputed.

According to Hassan, a cult will have different levels and types of information that are used and distributed in different ways. In AA there are widely available promotional pamphlets which are shown to the public. The conference-approved literature used at meetings is not limited from public access, but is not quoted much in promotional information. The old-timers control the information that is acceptable in the meetings. On the highest level of AA World Services, information is kept strictly out of the hands of the regular members. The inner working of AA on the highest level is a mystery to regular members. Despite what they tell the public, it is a highly secretive organization. There are several front organizations that disseminate information to the public such as the National Council of Alcoholism and Drug Dependence (NCADD,) the National Association of Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Counselors (NAADAC,) and the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM.) These organizations hide their relationship to AA on a public level, but publish information that is consistent with the tenets of AA such as information about the disease model, the spiritual disease, the need for a spiritual cure, etc. This information is rarely questioned in the mainstream media.

Members, however, are usually manipulated into divulging all information about themselves to their sponsor. There is frequent checking up on members who haven’t been seen at meetings for a while. An unexpected visit may happen, phone calls, people ask about other members at meetings. As for the extensive use of cult-generated propaganda, AA not only indoctrinates their own members with propaganda, they use their front organizations to disseminate information to the general public. Almost all of the drug and alcohol rehabilitation centers are based on AA’s 12-step model. These organizations do not give their clients any information about alternative methods. They claim that the 12-step model is the best if not the only way to recover from addiction. Although they claim that they are not affiliated with AA, they use exclusively AA conference approved literature. These programs are vehemently opposed to any alternative resources. This has a tremendous effect, not just on the members, but on the general public. Many people are unaware that alternative programs even exist. This demonstrates a highly effective propaganda machine that has been orchestrated by AA.

The level of secrecy at the top of the AA pyramid is mirrored by the level at which privacy of the regular members is violated. In AA confession takes place in the fourth and fifth steps of the program. The fourth step reads: Made a searching and fearless moral inventory on ourselves, and the fifth: Admitted to God, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs. It is usually the sponsor who acts as the person hearing the confession, although some members choose to use clergy or a therapist. There is strong pressure from the group to go through the confession. “If you don’t do a fourth you will drink a fifth.” The superstition is constantly reinforced that one must follow the procedure or they will return to active addiction and they will die. The sponsors in the program often take advantage of the prevailing attitude that the member must confess everything, hold nothing back or else they will drink again. Violation of confidentiality is not uncommon. Goading members into revealing things about themselves that are humiliating, demeaning, and destructive to self-esteem is precisely the point of the confession process. There is no method of absolving one’s past moral shortcomings in the program. In meetings there is a degree of one-upmanship that occurs. The worse one makes himself appear, the better. Members whose lives were not quite as gruesome before joining AA will feel compelled to lie and fabricate stories in order to fit in, or relapse and have more extreme “adventures” to report to the group.

When I was a member of the cult I had only a vague idea about alternative programs for addiction recovery. I was under the impression that any information that contradicted the program was false information. I had almost no knowledge of scientific research about addiction. I had no idea of how the upper levels of AA worked.

New information about addiction is never added; new concepts are never considered. An AA member will get a certain amount of information and then that’s it. Whenever the idea of updating the basic text or making changes in the program is brought up it is met with condescending remarks or hostility. There is no learning in AA, only indoctrination.

Since I left AA, I have investigated numerous programs dealing with addiction. I have read a multitude of books on the subject. I have also studied psychological theories and practices for overcoming drug dependence and dealing with mind-control. Before leaving AA, I was controlled by the superstitious fears that are intrinsic to the program. I had developed a belief system that made it a kind of “sin” to explore ideas concerning addiction recovery. The punishment for committing such a sin would be death. Those who criticize AA are often accused of “killing alcoholics.” They are actually called “murderers” in some cases because they would lead the alcoholic away from the one true “proven” method of recovery.

AA does have a way of creating the irrational belief system in a fairly short period of time. The reasons for this are that the people who come in to AA are often in desperate condition. They will be willing to accept anything that appears to be a viable solution to their problem. The dominant discourse in society mirrors much of what AA says. The result is that newcomers have little reason to question the validity of what they are told.

ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS AND THOUGHT CONTROL

I came, I came to, I came to believe. These are the words you will hear at AA meetings to briefly describe how someone has been “saved” from the clutches of alcoholism. AA, its members, its literature, its doctrine are always good; these things will always lead you away from taking that first drink. Alternative programs, critical literature, former members, non-members, and one’s own ideas are “deadly.” These things will lead to drinking and drinking means certain death.

A great many AA members actually believe that their lives depend on the program literally; they are thoroughly convinced that if they were not in AA they would be dead. The old-timers will say repeatedly, the way to stay sober is you don’t drink, go to meetings, get a sponsor, work the steps, and read the Big Book. That’s how they did it. The dogma is backed up by stories, often graphic, horrific anecdotes of what life was like when they were drinking. The old-timers tell of time spent in jails, mental institutions, suicide attempts, life threatening injuries, hospital emergency rooms, and of course they tell the tales of those who didn’t find AA in time, and worse, those who did find AA, but committed the deadly sin of abandoning the program. Those victims of alcoholism whose dead bodies were found floating in a river, in a smashed up automobile, hanging from a rope in a hotel room, or bloated and stinking behind a dumpster. The old-timers will then claim that it is AA that saved them from this horrible disease. If they do not work the steps, go to meetings, etc. the disease will take over and they will drink themselves to death.

There is no doubt that alcohol dependence kills people. AA uses this fact and blends it with their fictional cure to create a very powerful form of thought control. The program is not designed to create an independence from alcohol, it is specifically designed and fine-tuned to create a dependence on the group. Anything that might lead one away from the group is considered dangerous. Grave warnings are given about spending too much time with work, family, or hobbies. The members are told to put as much effort into recovery as they did into drinking.

“Recovery must come first,” is what people are told. This does not mean doing what one needs to do in order to create a life that is free from alcohol, it means devoting one’s self to the program. Those people that are not alcoholics, and never had the joy of joining AA are called “normies,” “flatlanders,” or “earth people.” These outsiders do not know what it is like to have the disease; they will not understand those who are in recovery. AA claims that there is a psychological difference that alcoholics have from the outsiders, and they need AA in order to arrest the disease. The program is filled with its own insider jargon and redefined words that the members learn to use. The result is that they speak in such a way that those outside the program really don’t understand what the AA folks are talking about. The claim is that no one ever fully recovers from alcoholism, they only get a relief from it one day at a time with the help of their higher power, and the program of Alcoholics Anonymous. The intent is dependence and obedience, not health and freedom.

Hassan starts the list of criteria for thought control with the insistence that the members internalize the groups’ doctrine as “truth,” which includes black and white thinking, good and evil, and the “us and them” ideology. One of the tactics that is used in a cult situation is repetition. When someone hears the same thing over and over and hears nothing else to the contrary, they start to believe that it is the truth. This tactic is used extensively in AA. The ideas expressed in meetings never change. The reading from the beginning of chapter five of the Big Book introduces every meeting. It is repeated to the point that the words lose meaning; they become more like a chant, a kind of hypnotic mantra.

All cults use clichés, platitudes, and slogans. They may seem clever and cute at first, but in examining them, they are vapid, overly simplistic pseudo-answers for any situation that a member might have in life. AA has a ridiculous number of these that they use frequently; they are heard at every meeting. Any time the dogma is questioned one of these slogans is given in response: “if it works, don’t fix it.” “let go and let God,” “take the cotton out of your ears and put it in your mouth.” There are lists of hundreds of these slogans that have been compiled. The extensive use of these slogans starts to have an effect; people actually start to believe that the slogans have some significant relevance to their lives. People think in terms of the slogans. They develop a speech pattern where the clichÄs of the program are used habitually in place of thoughtful responses.

In AA, there is no need to look for subtle indications that there might be tactics that are designed to control the thoughts of the members. AA quite blatantly states that it is wrong to think for one’s self. Self-will is considered evil, having and doing one’s own will is what leads one to relapse in AA. God’s will is good and pure; God’s will keeps you sober. Members are warned, “your best thinking got you here,” “utilize, don’t analyze,” “stinkin’ thinkin’ will lead to drinkin’.” It is only the ideas that come from the program that are safe. Members are taught that their own ideas are “alcoholic,” “diseased.” They are taught that they are not capable of making good decisions for themselves. The level of dependency on the program becomes intense when the members’ own thoughts can only come from the program. Independence is forbidden.

There is emphasis placed on “getting the program” those who relapse are considered people who just didn’t “get it” this time and are told to “try it again; this time you need to be more thorough.” Fully comprehending the program is said to be the guarantee that one will achieve permanent independence from alcohol. Not only that but the “spiritual awakening” takes place; it is the method by which one achieves “serenity,” free from all their worries and no longer tormented by the trivialities of life, for they are doing the will of God. The first two steps teach members that they are powerless over addiction and they need the help of a power greater than themselves in order to stay sober. The disease is said to be more powerful than the person and so the cure must also be more powerful than the individual. The individual is reduced to absolutely nothing; they must accept the doctrine of the program or yield to the disease.

This is a sadistic mind-trick. The Big Book is vague and ambiguous, containing page after page of metaphorical gibberish. Nobody can ever understand it because it doesn’t make any sense. There is a format in the Big Book, a combination of absolute statements and metaphorical phrases: “thoroughly follow our path,” “completely give themselves to this simple program,” “want what we have and be willing to got to any lengths…” These are the “instructions” that tell one how to stay sober. The instructions are incomprehensible; this is one of the many reasons that an overwhelming majority of members relapse within a short period of time.

The messages in the book, the discourse in the meetings, and the promotional literature of AA are full of contradictions. Between the contradictory information, the metaphorical ambiguity, and the overly-simplistic platitudes, the result is an actual damage in the thought process among the members. One’s ability to view real life situations in a realistic and logical manner becomes severely impaired. As this process develops the dependence on the cult increases.

After I had made one of the most psychologically healthy decisions of my life and decided to walk away from AA and sever my ties with it completely, I found that I was still stuck with a great many cult superstitions. For example, I still referred to myself as a “recovering addict,” I was not willing to let go of the idea that AA may be helpful to some people, I clung to the “disease” concept for some time. I remember coming to the realization that not just some, but all of the program’s information was false. It came as if a huge weight had been lifted off of me when I could comfortably reject every single aspect of the program.

ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS AND EMOTIONAL CONTROL

The most vicious and dehumanizing aspects of the program of Alcoholics Anonymous lie within the category of emotional control. When Hassan outlines the aspects of emotional control in the BITE model, he starts with the narrowing of a person’s range of feelings, and the blame for all problems being placed on the individual rather than the group or leaders. In AA the goal is to have what they call a “spiritual awakening.” This is supposed to be the result of having “worked the steps.” A spiritual awakening is clamed to cause an enlightened state of consciousness that they call “serenity.” Having attained serenity, a person will be free from bad things such as anger, resentment, selfishness, fear, and just about any other negative emotion they claim will inevitably lead to the dreaded relapse. The steps are considered to be an infallible path to the desired state of serenity, and so anything that a member may experience which is unpleasant, is always the fault of that person. If one relapses, that is because they were not rigorously honest; if one gets angry and resentful it is because they are not “working their program.”

What this creates is an enormous burden of guilt on the members. The steps are undefined and indefinable, therefore it is impossible to actually work them. Members are made to feel guilty for not working a program that can’t be worked; a vicious circle is created. Members learn to create a new identity that is based on the expectations of the group. The member’s place in the group is dependent on the amount of time since his or her last drink; this is what defines who one is as a person in the terms of the group. Six months, five years, nine days, twenty years, and so on are terms that establish one’s position in the cult. Those who relapse are made to feel that they had betrayed the program. No matter how much time they had before, a relapse will put the member back to square one. A top dog who can boast twelve years can get drunk one night and return. They are then considered a “newcomer” and they only have “one day.” Guilt is reinforced by regular confessions and “moral inventories” and anyone who relapses takes full blame. Those who have gone for years without a drink cannot take the credit for it; the credit goes to the program and God.

During the years that I spent in the program, I have lost track long ago of the number of members who died prematurely. The leading causes are suicides, overdoses, and accidents. I don’t recall anyone who died of natural causes. Fear and indoctrination of phobias are the primary method that AA uses in order to maintain its members. Deviation from the program will result in a relapse and ultimately death. Members are told that they will need the program for their entire lives, and that to abandon it will result in “jails, institutions, and death.” Those who manage to retain abstinence from alcohol after leaving the program are said to be miserable or insane; they are likely to commit suicide.

Being relived of these fears has given me an enthusiasm for life that I have not felt during the entire time that I was in AA. Abandoning the program is what has enabled me to feel truly alive. Over the years I had struggled with addiction and severe depression, I was always given the same advice: go to more meetings, work the program, get a sponsor, and pray to your higher power. None of this worked. I made my own decision, which was against the advice of everyone that I knew at the time; I left AA for good, and that worked.

A FEW THINGS THAT THE BITE MODEL DOES NOT SAY ABOUT AA

It is not even a question as to whether or not AA fits the BITE model. Obviously, it does. The cult of Alcoholics Anonymous is clearly as dangerous and destructive if not more so than the most notorious cults in our society. Some of the most tyrannical aspects of AA are not addressed in the BITE model. There is no other cult that has managed to infiltrate the United States court system and have people court ordered to attend its meetings. Under the pretense of being “spiritual, not religious” AA has slipped past the Constitution of the United States and has set up a system of enforced religious indoctrination. This cult has also infiltrated the medical, psychology, psychiatry, and social services fields; there are numerous professionals who will suggest or “prescribe” AA as a viable method of overcoming addiction. Many of these people are not even aware that alternative programs exist. Over 90% of the addiction rehabilitation centers in the United States are based on the 12-step program; very few offer an alternative. The mainstream media almost always portrays 12-step programs in a positive light. Public criticism of these programs creates the same kind of reaction as criticizing a major religion.

As I brought up earlier, no one joins AA to achieve enlightenment; they join out of fear of dying, going insane, or losing what they have in life, or they were coerced into joining by the court system, employer, or family and friends. This enables AA to create a unique kind of recruiting and indoctrination. Most cults start with promises, then introduce threats. AA starts with threats then introduces more threats. The goal of achieving “serenity” is overshadowed by the goal of not dropping dead from addiction. AA is a cult of necrophilia, a group of people who have become preoccupied with death. Jails, institutions, and death are said to be the end result of addictive drinking. It is common to hear a member say, “I’ve been in jails, I’ve been in institutions, there’s only one more place to go.”

NOT JUST A CULT – THE CULT

Steve Hassan is wrong about AA. It is not just that he has misdiagnosed it as a relatively harmless group that does not fit the BITE model, he has also failed to recognize the political importance of AA as a target for anti-cult activism.

A major part of the frustration in dealing with political activism against cults is the amazing amount of power that these organizations tend to hold. They are usually backed by large amounts of money, legal expertise, and to varying degrees favorable public opinion. AA is a cult that has infiltrated every aspect of our society to the point that it is almost untouchable. The cult dogma has contaminated our culture so much that it is probably the biggest case to crack. Public exposure of AA as a cult is likely to have a serious effect on the court systems, the medical fields, the media, and the amount of power cults will be able to gain in the future. Exposing AA is the first step in creating a multitude of new and exciting methods of dealing with drug and alcohol dependence, and making a difference in our society.

Obama just can’t seem to bust out the magic when the teleprompter is out of range

Obama Is Addicted to the Teleprompter

3.6.09 / GD / Thaindian News

Barack Obama may soon be known as the Teleprompter President as his dependence on his teleprompters get more notice every day. He goes nowhere without them and is not usually seen speaking without their help.

Onlookers have found that Obama with and without his teleprompter becomes two different men. While the President is fluid in his speech and shows total poise in a prepared speech, his unscreened answers or extempore speech are too full of the universal filler “umm”. It has become obvious that he cannot go beyond the scripted words without a good deal of stuttering, causing a fresh wave of criticism of the president who cannot speak off the cuff.

According a report in the New York Times, Obama is possibly the only American President in 50 years to have such a major dependence on his Teleprompter. Other Presidents used teleprompters on their most important speeches, whether it was the inaugural speech or the Oval Office address. But Obama uses them for routine announcements too. He used them on a visit to the Caterpillar plant in Peoria, Ill and then to make remarks about his “fiscal responsibility summit”. He even used them to talk about endangered species of animals reading out from the teleprompter, “That was an experience I will never forget.”

The New York Times also says, “For Mr. Obama, a teleprompter means message discipline, sticking close to the intended words. While some presidents prefer extemporizing, Mr. Obama likes the message to be just so. After all, he is a best-selling author who has helped write a lot of his major speeches, so he presumably feels a certain fidelity to the crafted text.”

Awkwardness often ensues like the time he introduced Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius as the Health and Human Services secretary and when she came up to the stage, she could speak only before the teleprompters were lowered. Also, critics say Obama is losing some credibility because he almost never establishes eye contact with his audience while reading out from the teleprompter.

Vietnam veterans group sues CIA for MKULTRA experimentation on GIs

Vietnam Vets Sue CIA for Secret Drug Experiments on GIs

1.7.09 / Jeff Stein / CQ Politics

A Vietnam veterans group is suing the CIA for “thousands of secret experiments to test toxic chemical and biological substances under code names such as MKULTRA.,” its attorneys said today.

The suit was filed in federal court in northern California on behalf of the Washington-based Vietnam Veterans of America, Inc., and six aging veterans with multiple diseases and ailments “tied to a diabolical and secret testing program, whereby U.S. military personnel were deliberately exposed, by government and military agencies, to chemical and biological weapons and other toxins without informed consent,” the Morrison & Foerster law firm said in a press release.

The firm said the alleged CIA research program was launched in the early 1950s and continued through at least 1976 at the Edgewood Arsenal and Fort Detrick, Md., as well as universities and hospitals across the country contracted by the CIA.

Defendants include the CIA, the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense and various government officials responsible for these agencies.

“The CIA secretly provided financing, personnel, and direction for the experiments, which were mainly conducted or contracted by the Army,” the suit says.

According to the veterans, the experiments, conducted over a 25 year period, included:

·    the use of troops to test nerve gas, psychochemicals, and thousands of other toxic chemical or biological substances, and … the insertion of septal implants in the brains of subjects in … mind control experiments that went awry, leaving many civilian and military subjects with permanent disabilities;

·    the failure to secure informed consent and other widespread failures to follow the precepts of U.S. and international law regarding the use of human subjects, including the 1953 Wilson Directive and the Nuremberg Code;

·    a … refusal by the DoD, the CIA, and the Army to … locate the victims of their … experiments or to provide health care or compensation to them;

·    the  destruction by the CIA of evidence and files

The plaintiffs have scheduled a news conference Wednesday at the San Francisco offices of the Morrison & Foerster firm.

UPDATE: CIA spokeswoman Marie Harf said the agency would have no comment “on specific matters before the court.”

But, she added, “CIA activities related to MK-ULTRA have been thoroughly investigated, and the CIA fully cooperated with each of the investigations. In addition, tens of thousands of pages from documents related to the program have been declassified and released to the public.

“MK-ULTRA was investigated in 1975 by the Rockefeller Commission and the Church Committee, and in 1977 by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Subcommittee on Health and Scientific Research,” Harf added.

Several books have been written about the CIA drug experiments, which began with a Korean War-era mind-control race with Soviet and Chinese scientists. The idea was to create an American version of “The Manchurian Candidate,” or drug-controlled assassin.

Evidence suggests Vermont State Hospital colluded with CIA for MKULTRA experimentation

Evidence suggests CIA funded experiments at state hospital

11.30.08 / Louis Porter / Rutland Herald

Few people in Vermont remember Dr. Robert W. Hyde, but one of his former patients can’t forget him. The doctor was involved in one of the nation’s darkest chapters in medical science: In the 1950s, Hyde conducted drug and psychological experiments at a Boston hospital through funding that apparently originated with the CIA. Later, he became director of research at the Vermont State Hospital.

The patient, Karen Wetmore, is convinced that Hyde and other researchers subjected her and possibly other patients to experiments paid for by the CIA at the Waterbury facility.

In addition to her claim, new evidence, though incomplete, suggests that such tests might have been conducted at the Vermont State Hospital.

Several books and numerous newspaper accounts have detailed how techniques developed through testing, including on mental health patients at hospitals in other parts of the country, are related to the interrogation methods used in Guantanamo and other locations in the war on terror. These well-known and well-documented drug experiments began in secret after the Korean War and were sponsored by the U.S. government.

News accounts and histories of the experiments have not mentioned the Vermont State Hospital, but a congressional committee concluded that dozens of institutions, some of which have never been identified, were involved in secret experiments for the CIA.

A complicated, disturbing story

Wetmore, who grew up in Brandon and now lives in Rutland, resided at the Vermont State Hospital for extended periods in her teens and early 20s.

Hyde had a long and distinguished career as a psychiatrist and university researcher before he returned to Vermont in the late 1960s. He died in Bakersfield, his birthplace, in 1976.

This story centers on the possible intersection of Hyde’s research work and Wetmore’s experiences at the state hospital. The strands of the narrative, constructed from government documents and her memory, is complicated, confusing and sometimes disturbing.

Her claim, that the Waterbury hospital was involved in experimentation on patients, has never been reported despite numerous instances in which it could have come to public attention, including a lawsuit that Wetmore settled out of court.

Further complicating matters is Wetmore’s severe memory loss, which she says is the result of her treatment at the Vermont State Hospital where she says she was given experimental drugs, experienced repetitive electroshock therapy and was subjected unwittingly to other tests. Her medical records from the Vermont State Hospital, including daily logs and summaries of her treatment support these claims.

Another obstacle for Wetmore is the social stigma of mental illness. She says once a patient is committed to a mental hospital, “the first thing they take away from you is your credibility.”

In order to figure out what really happened to her at the Vermont State Hospital and to overcome this credibility gap, Wetmore has spent more than 12 years collecting and analyzing reams of government documents, including state hospital records, declassified CIA paperwork and histories of MK-Ultra, the code name of the CIA’s best-known clandestine research projects on mind-control.

At many points Wetmore reached dead ends: The government denied her requests for certain documents and heavily redacted key evidence from others. Some documents were destroyed.

In 1997, Wetmore decided to bring a lawsuit against the state. A psychiatrist and a Rutland lawyer agreed to help her with the case and spent months collecting and poring over evidence. They both came to the conclusion that Wetmore was the subject of drug experiments at the hospital.

Wetmore and her advocates could not unequivocally link her case to the CIA’s research activities at other institutions through government documents from the agency, but histories of the CIA’s psychiatric testing, other documents and a preponderance of circumstantial evidence around Wetmore’s treatment based on her medical records suggest the Vermont State Hospital may have been one of the sites for secret experimentation.

The CIA destroyed much of the evidence regarding the drug and psychological tests on unwitting patients in the 1970s as the truth about its funding for the tests came to light, according to a 1975 congressional review headed by U.S. Sen. Frank Church.

Several authors have examined government research programs in other parts of the country, but they have not fingered the Vermont State Hospital as a site for the secret experiments.

Several striking conclusions have arisen from their research and Wetmore’s paper trail:

  • As a teenager, Wetmore was a patient at the Vermont State Hospital in Waterbury. While Hyde was not her primary doctor, he at least reviewed her case. She was also treated with powerful drugs, some of which were almost certainly experimental.
  • Hyde was an international pioneer in the development of mind-altering drugs and in their use in treating mental illness. He was involved in research programs sponsored and secretly funded by the CIA and the U.S. military. With an Army psychiatrist, he also conducted research on drugs designed to produce mental illness in healthy people who volunteered for such studies. In 1949, Hyde was an early experimenter with LSD: He volunteered to take the drug himself.
  • The Army psychiatrist, Dr. Max Rinkel, was particularly interested in using LSD to induce in mentally healthy people a schizophrenia-like state. The symptoms exhibited by these test subjects show similarities to those Wetmore experienced, according to her medical records from the Vermont State Hospital.
  • The experiments conducted by Rinkel, Hyde and their associates (sometimes even on themselves) were an important part of secret programs run by and for the CIA to construct “black operations” for prisoner interrogation and other espionage and military uses. “Black ops” were designed to look like civilian programs, even to the researchers, with the CIA gleaning the results.
  • The intelligence funding was often disguised as grants that were passed through organizations or other agencies. Psychiatric researchers at dozens of sites around the country, including state hospitals, prisons and universities, many of which have never been identified, cooperated sometimes knowingly and sometimes unwittingly in research on human test subjects.
  • Finally, official documents Wetmore has uncovered show that the Vermont State Hospital had a history of experimenting with drug treatments on its patients. At least one of those experiments, which predated Hyde’s tenure at the hospital, was financed by the federal agencies identified by researchers as a conduit for money for the CIA “black-ops” experimentation. In addition, the Vermont State Hospital doctors were corresponding about that grant work with Dr. John Gittinger, a CIA scientist in Washington, D.C.

    Many of the people affiliated with the Vermont State Hospital in the 1960s and 1970s when Hyde worked at the Waterbury facility said they do not believe or do not have evidence that either the hospital or Hyde carried out such experiments on patients at the Waterbury facility. Few of the individuals interviewed for this story were willing to speak on the record; many of the most important potential sources are now deceased.

    The Vermont State Hospital’s current director, Terry Rowe, said she is not familiar with the questions Wetmore raises.

    “This is information that was unknown to me,” Rowe said. “I don’t know it if is valid or not.”

    It is also important to note that although the experiments represent an ugly period in American psychiatric research, they were followed by a revolution in the field of mental health. In some instances, the same scientists who were involved in CIA-funded experiments also conducted the research that has led to the development of drug therapies that have enabled many patients to live comparatively normal lives.

    This phenomenon in turn has allowed mental hospitals and other institutions around the nation to significantly reduce the number of patients who require 24-hour care.

    A researcher’s dark connections

    The trail linking Karen Wetmore’s treatment at Vermont State Hospital to the CIA is twisting, sometimes nearly impossible to follow and for the most part cold, but what kept Wetmore going was the recurring and distinctive footprint of Dr. Robert Hyde.

    Hyde was 25 when he graduated as a Reserve Officer Training Corps student at the University of Vermont’s school of medicine in 1935. He rose to the rank of lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Army and worked as an intern at the Marine Hospital in New Orleans.

    He later became a researcher at Boston University and Harvard University and assistant superintendent at Boston Psychopathic, a hospital associated with Harvard now known as the Massachusetts Mental Health Center – and one of the key institutions connected to the CIA research. Hyde then served as assistant superintendent at Butler Health Center in Providence, R.I., before returning to Vermont as director of research at Vermont State Hospital.

    Hyde died on Aug. 1, 1976, leaving a widow and no children. He was, in the words of a co-worker at the Waterbury hospital, “a sweetheart.”

    He also was an intellectual adventurer. In 1949, while serving as assistant superintendent at Boston Psychopathic, he experimented on himself, taking what many believe to be the first acid trip in America.

    “There is no way of determining who was the first American to take LSD. But one of the earliest was a Boston doctor named Robert Hyde,” Jay Stevens wrote in “Storming Heaven,” a history of the drug. “What followed was fascinating. Right before their eyes, Hyde, the even-keeled Vermonter, turned into a paranoiac, as a swarm of little suspicions — why are those people smiling? Was that a door closing? — began eating away at his composure.”

    It was Hyde’s colleague, Rinkel, who is credited with bringing the first batch of LSD into the United States. Earlier in 1949, Rinkel had obtained a supply of LSD from Sandoz Pharmaceuticals in Switzerland, where it was developed, and brought it home with him to Boston Psychopathic. Rinkel and Hyde went on to organize an LSD study at the facility in which they tested the drug on 100 volunteers, reporting their initial findings in May 1950 at the annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association.

    So began the scientific foray into an aspect of mental health research that struggled for funding, although it eventually produced revolutionary breakthroughs in the field. The new drug therapies led to a significant reduction in the number of institutionalized mental patients nationwide. At the Vermont State Hospital in Waterbury the shift has been dramatic. Once there were 1,200 patients housed at the facility; now it treats about 50.

    Long before the Boston researchers’ work laid the foundation for those groundbreaking psychiatric studies, it garnered attention from another, less benign profession. Soon after the Rinkel-Hyde report appeared in the APA journal, the CIA became interested in the researchers’ work, according to Stevens and others who have researched the subject.

    “Early on they contacted Rinkel and Hyde at Mass. Mental Health, and with Hyde as the principal contact began pouring as much as $40,000 a year into LSD research,” Stevens wrote.

    The CIA and the U.S. military had their own reasons for wanting to finance such experiments, an interest dating at least to the Korean War when American prisoners of war were subjected to various psychiatric drugs.

    In the 1950s, the New York Times, reporting on congressional hearings and studies of the effect of Communist interrogation of U.S. prisoners, wrote: “Chinese Communist attempts to create confusion, disloyalty and doubts about this country’s role were highly effective among American prisoners captured during the Korean War, an Army psychiatrist said here today.”

    The article went on to report on the 1950 meeting of the American Psychiatric Association and on Rinkel’s research “based on the experimental reproduction of mental illness in 100 normal volunteers. The illness, similar to schizophrenia, was induced by small dosages of the chemical d-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD).”
    More recently, since the United States launched the war on terror, government use of earlier research into mind-altering drugs and torture-resistance techniques for U.S. soldiers have come under scrutiny. Military interrogators employ related tactics at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and at other sites around the world, according to articles in the New York Times, the New Yorker magazine and a book by New Yorker staffer Jane Mayer, “The Dark Side.”

    The Korean War torture methods were outlined in a chart published in a 1957 Air Force study.

    “The recycled chart is the latest and most vivid evidence of the way Communist interrogation methods that the United States long described as torture became the basis for interrogations both by the military at the base at Guanatanmo Bay, Cuba, and by the Central Intelligence Agency,” according to a New York Times report in 2008.

    Another recent mention of the connection between “spies and shrinks” was made in an Oct. 18 Newsweek article.

    “The ties go back decades, to the early years of the Cold War when psychologists helped the CIA experiment on U.S. citizens with mind-altering drugs. The relationship has warmed and cooled over the years, heating up whenever defense or intelligence officials wanted better mind-control methods, ways to direct people’s behavior or detect deception,” according to the magazine.

    The quote came from an article about Steven Reisner, a psychologist who is vying to become head of the American Psychological Association. Reisner wants to end cooperation of the organization’s members with interrogators.

    It’s not clear Rinkel and Hyde knew the CIA and U.S. military were secretly financing their work — although histories of the subject make the case that they did.

    Their colleagues and friends, however, insist the researchers did not collude with military intelligence.

    In 1977, in response to an investigation into the CIA experiments, Harold Pfautz wrote a letter to the editor of The New York Times defending his own research — funded in part by the Society for the Investigation of Human Ecology, an MK-Ultra front — and that of Hyde.

    Pfautz wrote: “I know that I (and I am convinced that Dr. Robert W. Hyde, then superintendent of the Butler Health Center, as well as my other colleagues) had no knowledge of the CIA auspices and functions of the Society for the Investigation of Human Ecology. In a word this was a ‘black’ operation — deceptive and intended to deceive — on the part of the government and addressed to me as a citizen.”

    No one has specifically looked at whether MK-Ultra experiments occurred in Vermont. Former employees, attorneys and doctors familiar with the facility and its patients, as well as researchers who have studied case histories of the hospital’s patients, have all said they found no evidence of unethical experimentation before Hyde returned to the hospital or after that would lead them to believe that the institution had been used for MK-Ultra experimentation.

    Among the strongest defenders of Hyde’s reputation is Lois Sabin, who was an administrator at the hospital for years and served for a time as director of nursing education.

    Sabin is adamant that Hyde left his interest in experimental research behind him when he returned to Vermont to work at the state hospital.

    “He was a very brilliant man and a great asset at the hospital,” said Sabin, who is now retired and still lives in Waterbury. “I thought he was a sweetheart. He was very, very knowledgeable.”

    A trail of missing documents

    Conclusive answers to the many questions Hyde’s history raises may never be known: many of the documents concerning the CIA funding, the front organizations and the drug experiments on mental health patients have been destroyed. In addition, many of those who were involved in the programs or may have known about them have died.

    A 1994 Government Accounting Office report on the clandestine research notes that at least 15 of the 80 facilities around North America known to have participated in the research remain unidentified and may never be, while others, including Boston Psychopathic Hospital and McGill University in Montreal, are well-known.

    In the McGill case, a prominent Albany, N.Y., psychiatrist, Ewen Cameron, was accused of working for the CIA and performing experiments on patients in a mental hospital there in the 1950s and 1960s.

    According to a book on the subject by John Marks, “Patients of Dr. Cameron were subjected to a regimen that included heavy doses of LSD and barbiturates, the application of powerful electric shocks two or three times a day, and prolonged periods of drug-induced sleep.” In 1988, the U.S. government paid nine former patients $750,000 to settle a lawsuit in the matter, and the Canadian government has also paid dozens of compensation claims.

    Wetmore is convinced that mind-altering experiments were also conducted at the Vermont State Hospital.

    Some of the procedures used in Cameron’s experiments, specifically electroshock and drug therapies, appear to be similar to those that appear on Wetmore’s medical charts at the state hospital.

    To support her claim, Wetmore cites a report on the results of a federal research grant for schizophrenia and the use of tranquilizers that was undertaken at the Vermont hospital in the late 1950s. The report was written long before Hyde became director of research at the state hospital and before Wetmore was a patient there.

    This research project included experimental use of the use of tri-fluoperazine on patients at the Waterbury hospital, an antipsychotic drug that is still used for some schizophrenia sufferers.

    The study reported disturbing results, including: “On the third day, the charge attendant said, ‘It’s like old times. It’s bedlam.’”

    “Thirteen patients were suffering severe withdrawal reactions indistinguishable clinically from a moderate withdrawal reaction following long-term ingestion of morphine,” according to the study results. Later in the study an attendant said nine patients were “constantly pacing back and forth like caged lions.”

    One of the consultants working on the study was Dr. Milton Greenblatt, who was also assistant superintendent at Massachusetts Mental Health Center — the former Boston Psychopathic, where Hyde was assistant superintendent.

    An even more direct link is in a report on a personality study at the Vermont State Hospital between 1963 and 1966 titled, “The Use of Programmed Instruction with Disturbed Students” and funded by the National Institute of Mental Health. The institute was one of the cover organizations used to conceal the source of funding for various CIA projects. These groups also paid for research unrelated to military or espionage studies.

    The study lists a Washington, D.C., address, 1834 Connecticut Ave. N.W., as a source for personality-testing information. That address is identified as a front for the spy agency in Marks’ book about the CIA’s experimental work, “The Search for the Manchurian Candidate.”

    The top CIA psychologist, John Gittinger, developed this personality assessment test that, according to Marks, became a centerpiece of the agency’s psychological work.

    The researchers in the Vermont hospital program not only used Gittinger’s test; they also sent him results of their own trials, according to a report on the research grant written by Vermont State Hospital doctors.

    So, was the Vermont State Hospital one of the institutions used by researchers to perform now-discredited experiments on hapless mental patients like Karen Wetmore? She believes absolutely that it was; others say they doubt it.

    The evidence is circumstantial and incomplete. Unless someone brings a case to court that breaks down the barriers that have been erected by the CIA, conclusive answers to questions Wetmore and the documentation she has gathered raises are unlikely.

    A patient on a quest

    The first time Wetmore was admitted to the Vermont State Hospital she was just a young girl.

    “It’s the only time I ever saw my father cry,” she said recently.

    A troubled child, Wetmore had been treated at outpatient mental health clinics, but her illness persisted. At 13, after she threatened her mother and was found wandering confusedly in the halls of her school in Brandon, Wetmore was committed to the Waterbury hospital for a little less than a year in 1965-1966 and again between 1970 and 1972.

    Now in her mid-50s, Wetmore, is physically frail and drawn looking. She lives alone in Rutland and is still in therapy. She speaks hesitantly when she talks about what little she recalls of her experiences at the Vermont State Hospital.

    In the intervening years, Wetmore has tried to trace the cause of her mental illness. She believes several traumas may have triggered her lifelong struggle with multiple personality disorder (a dissociative disorder in which the sufferer often compartmentalizes memories and aspects of their personality) and a form of extreme anxiety, a condition her doctors referred to as “hysteria” in the 1960s.

    Wetmore says that as a child she remembers seeing someone die in a fire. She also says she was traumatized by sexual abuse that she believes was perpetrated by a family friend. She attempted suicide twice as a young woman.

    When she was 15, Wetmore seemed well enough to be released from the Waterbury hospital. Looking back, she says she seemed to be recovering from her mental illness.

    She had been out of the Vermont State Hospital for two years when she was engaged to an 18-year-old from Brandon. In 1969, her fiancé was killed in a car accident.

    “That pretty much did it for me,” Wetmore said.

    Over the next few years, she was in and out of the state hospital, and she was eventually transferred to the psychiatry ward of Mary Fletcher in Burlington. Wetmore was 20 when she was finally released in 1972.

    Wetmore’s road to mental health has been difficult. She attempted suicide before and after her time in the hospital and was held in the psychiatry ward at Rutland Regional Hospital several times, including after her stints at the state hospital.

    Gradually, she gained control of her life, though even now there are long periods of her personal history she cannot remember. To retrace her forgotten steps she has documented what happened to her through medical records starting in the mid-1990s. Now boxes of documents and shelves of books line a closet in the Rutland apartment where she lives.

    “We had to go through hell and high water to get my medical records,” she said.

    Dr. Thomas Fox, the Rutland doctor who treated Wetmore, was so appalled by the nature of her state hospital treatment records that he agreed to help her with a lawsuit against the state in 1997. Fox, who also became a top mental health official with the state of New Hampshire before his death, had never before agreed to be an expert witness in a civil litigation.

    A 140-page deposition and an outline by Fox show that he concluded that Wetmore was an unwitting subject of experimental testing while she was a patient at the Vermont State Hospital.

    “Although Plaintiff was not schizophrenic or otherwise psychotic, she was treated with medication as if she were. Even though it was noted by the Defendants early on that she was allergic to these medications, that they would alter her behavior adversely, and that they would cause her permanent damage and even threaten her life, she was involuntarily administered massive doses of these drugs throughout the periods of her confinement,” according to Wetmore’s lawsuit. “Plaintiff was kept almost constantly in seclusion, often bound with wristlets behind her back, and left to lie unattended and unrelieved, naked on a tile floor.”

    “I became convinced, based on the record, that Karen had been mistreated at certain phases of her treatment in (Waterbury), and that, from a professional standpoint, the way in which we police ourselves, the way in which we keep each other ethical and competent, when we identify that, we (members of our profession) should do something about it,” Fox said in a deposition in the lawsuit to Wetmore and the state’s lawyer. “That’s my feeling, you should act on it.”

    He wrote in an outline that he prepared for her lawsuit in 2000: “I must conclude, in my opinion, that Karen was involved in drug experimentation without her knowledge or consent.”

    Fox said he reached this conclusion because at the hospital Wetmore was kept in “seclusion” or isolation for extended periods of time — apparently for weeks at a stretch during a period of months. She was given placebos, and her medications were changed, indicating there was an experimental aspect to her care, he wrote.

    Moreover, the treatment Wetmore received did not follow standard treatment for “hysteria,” the diagnosis that Fox said would have been most supported by her symptoms. Wetmore has also been diagnosed at the hospital with multiple personality syndrome — an assessment she agrees with — and schizophrenia, which she and Fox both said was not accurate. Treatment for schizophrenia is significantly different from care for a multiple personality syndrome diagnosis.

    While at the hospital Wetmore was given electroshock treatment — sometimes many times a day according to her medical records — and Metrazol, a drug that can induce seizures and whose federal approval has since been revoked.

    She was also subjected to other treatments, including with other medications and shock treatment, the nature of which are still not fully known.

    Fox also noted that during the periods in which Wetmore was there the Vermont State Hospital was engaged in drug research.

    In the midst of building her lawsuit, Wetmore realized she had to drop it because of her failing physical health. She had a heart attack, her second. Wetmore, who still has several serious physical health problems, reached a private settlement with the state instead, according to Alan George, her attorney.

    George, a sometime utility lawyer who practices in Rutland, said recently that because of the strength of the case he was very reluctant to accept that settlement agreement.

    “I didn’t really want to drop that suit,” George remembered. “I thought we had a pretty solid suit, frankly.”

    Wetmore’s lawsuit, based on the hard evidence required for a court of law, did not delve into what she believes to be the connections between her case and CIA research at the hospital.

    Fox steered clear of that aspect of the case in his work with Wetmore, he said in the deposition for her lawsuit.

    “I didn’t find it germane to what I viewed as my task. It was outside the scope of what I perceived the issues to be,” he said.

    “We never really got to the bottom of that (CIA connection). We did not try the case based on some grand, national conspiracy even though Karen had connected some of the dots,” George said.

    George said they chose not to pursue her theories about the CIA in part because most of the people were dead by the time the lawsuit was filed. Even so, George said, some aspects of Wetmore’s treatment were very strange.

    “The whole regimen of drug therapy … was bizarre,” he said. Furthermore, the background of some of those involved or consulted about the research at the hospital did strike George as odd.

    “There is no question about who these characters were and what they were involved in,” he said. “But all of that was guilt by association.”

    On the other side of this equation, though, are various mental health professionals in Vermont, including former state Mental Health Commissioner Jonathan Leopold, who in 1971 wrote a letter to Wetmore’s worried mother reassuring her that her daughter was undergoing treatment and doctors, including Dr. Robert Hyde, were reviewing her case.

    He also wrote: “Her behavior was very difficult and at times she represented a real danger to herself and to others. She was never, of course, left for three days and nights unattended in a separate room as all patients are taken out at frequent intervals for care and exercise and an opportunity to use the toilets.”

    Wetmore’s daily logs of her hospital stay and medical records appear to contradict that statement.

    Whatever the connections between the federal government and what happened to Wetmore in the state hospital, the experience has left Wetmore physically frail, but as determined as ever to find out what really happened to her.

    Wetmore says she doesn’t think mental health patients should ever be involved, even when they apparently give consent, in psychological experiments no matter how beneficial they may be to society. Her experience, she says, is proof of how such studies can damage the life of a vulnerable person.

  • How the Illuminati try to keep their power and control the public, using “it’s gonna happen, it’s gonna happen” tricknology-hypnosis

    by Stefan Fobes

    Colin Powell, Joe Biden and others have been going around saying there’s some crisis in the works, it’s secret, we can’t tell you what it is. Folks, there’s no crisis happening. What is happening is a simple, but highly effective on someone who lacks the knowledge of it, trick.

    The subconscious mind is always recording and listening to whatever is out there, and it exists in an open state, and without a firewall in its default mode It can also be programmed externally by immoral individuals in government, private tax exempt foundations, etc, who hold this knowledge. What is done, when people are told by said immoral individuals that so called terrorist attacks are gonna happen, gonna happen, gonna happen in six months or whatever, often specifically and intentionally spoken in an alarming and/or slow tone to bring up and maximize people’s fears, whether they be conscious or subconscious.  If someone knows about the presence of a certain fear, say an overly high, pervasive fear of impending death, they can take that and use it to exercise control over another. At one level, for example, someone who is afraid of dying and someone who doesn’t like them very much is trying to kill them bloodlessly. They might roll on up outside the door when someone is showering and say, “Are you in there? I hope you didn’t fall and hit your head!” Terror explodes across that person’s mind as the thought takes on a life of its own and goes spiraling off into scenarios, such as the mind-program that we’re all born with tends to do. If someone is susceptible enough by being in a weakened mental and emotional state due to insanity, extreme financial hardship, loneliness, extreme emotional/physical trauma, drug/alcohol abuse, then they have a much higher rate of being susceptible to this than someone who isn’t. These are also the criteria used to select victims for gang stalking, and for subjects for the secret government projects like the covert electromagnetic weapons tests. The Illuminati understand this principle well and that’s why they have all those institutes like Tavistock and the like to study the mind (and break it) like it’s a 12 year old boy with his first copy of Playboy. At another level they know that through the subconscious, we create our reality, and this is how the experiences of nations and planets are birthed. This is already understood to a small extent via hypnosis, where a stage hypnotist can take a table and make you see a hippo. Mainstream science is inching toward this slowly but surely with their inroads into the placebo effect and the area of quantum physics.

    This computer that I type on right now is why I believe that I create and can control my experience. When I get extremely stressed and am using it….bam! It freezes right up and I can get nothing done. But when I relax and calm down it’s like someone pressed the play button on Existence’s DVD player and everything starts right up again. Don’t know what anyone else’s experiences are on the subject, so I can only speak for myself. And on the last level of this, since the Illuminati know that at their root, all experiences are about cooperation and noncooperation, this again is another example of asking for consent to cooperate with creating a desired reality for the Illuminati. And that is whatever our fears will let the Illuminati do if they’re stoked up enough by being told there’s a crisis on the horizon and being vague about it or refusing to tell what it is. Because there is a certain democracy-like line where if a person has fear-based thoughts as the majority of their thoughts, their fear dives down to the subconscious for experiential manifestation. This answers the question that some, if they ask questions, have on why some people have fear but don’t manifest it in their experience, while others go over the cliff. But the (good?) thing is in my view that these people have succeeded so wildly in their efforts to mind control the population that the public has become so apathetic to issues that really matter due to the bombardment of everyone with irrelevant fluff  like movies and TV shows that insult the logical mind and have no resemblance whatsoever to everyday life, ball games, and other things, that apathy and decadence is the response to the prospect of potential self-annihilation. If it’s not some tabloidy juicy whitey scandal or racist comment, well, it doesn’t even register. It’s funny, but it’s true. That’s what all those research dollars are spent for.

    Alex Jones’s Terrorstorm documentary shows this beautifully with the guy in London who couldn’t see the cameras in front of where he worked even though they were about seven feet away.

    But we can take back control of our minds and therefore our experiences by standing up and overwriting fear with calm, hard resolve. People are saying we have to take back our currency to take back our lives. But to really change things, we can’t do the same old thing in a different context. This is the central pillar of puppet Barack Obama’s campaign. To really change things, this requires us to totally turn ourselves inside out, and to create a whole new system of exchanges. I’m not sure what it’ll be, possibly involving some sort of barter system and locally made and distributed goods independent from the big corporations as is already done to a degree in rural areas, but, if humanity continues to use the same system that coralled it for so long, it will soon force us to make the decisions that we could have made under more gentle circumstances.

    What life is like from a mind control survivor’s perspective

    Transcript of testimony given by mind control survivor

    This is a transcript from a presentation at the Eleventh Annual Ritual Abuse, Secretive Organizations and Mind Control Conference, August 2008.

    To return to our home page: http://members.aol.com/smartnews/index2.html

    A CD of this presentation can be ordered with the form at http://members.aol.com/smartnews/smart-2008-conference.htm

    Please use caution while reading to this presentation. It may be very heavy for survivors. All accusations are alleged. The conference is educational and not intended as therapy or treatment.

    Joanne is a survivor of RA, family and government mind control and medical experimentation. She has been working on recovery for 14 years and has been instrumental in helping her three dissociative children heal. She leads a life as an active professional in her chosen field in her community.

    Breaking the addiction of dissociation

    Hello.

    My name is Joanne.

    I am an addict. I am addicted to dissociation.
    Several months ago I started wondering if the defenses I commonly use could possibly be termed addiction. I knew they were habitual. I knew they happened

    spontaneously, like a reflex, without time for me to stop and reflect whether or not this was the response I wanted to use; I knew that when I tried to use

    other responses it was exceedingly difficult and required much continual mindfulness on my part.
    I looked up addiction in online dictionaries: “The condition of being habitually or compulsively occupied with or involved in something.” Hmmmmmmm.

    That sounds accurate.”The state of being enslaved to a habit or practice.” Well, that certainly fits! “And the last one: “Habitual psychological and

    physiological dependence on a practice beyond one’s voluntary control.” That definition fit completely. I COULD NOT stop dissociating when I wanted to.
    I do not attach a moral judgment to the word “Addiction”. It is a simple statement of fact. I did not make the choice to voluntarily start using

    dissociation to get through life. I did not make the choice to continue to use it. I would not be alive today if I had not learned and used the skill of

    dissociation. But it is now beyond my control and is now unnecessary in my life. Naming this addiction gives me tools to use so I can let go of it. I

    am able to be more patient with myself and more effective in overcoming it.
    OK. So I knew I was addicted. But exactly what was I addicted TO?
    Researching the term “dissociation” I found this definition by Dr. Bennett Braun: “the separation of an idea or thought process from the main stream of

    consciousness” (Braun, 1988). Everybody uses dissociation. People use it to screen out unnecessary stimuli. With untraumatized people, this is a

    choice and not problematical. Any time a person is focused in on something to the exclusion of one or more aspects of present day reality, they are using

    dissociation. Everyone here has used this – perhaps when reading a book, or practicing a musical instrument, or figuring out income tax. That kind of

    dissociation is helpful
    Another way to think of dissociation is as a method of dealing with trauma by not knowing about it. The memory of events may be split into separate

    components. Dr. Bennett Braun developed the BASK model; an easy way to understand this. BASK stands for Behavior, Affect, Sensation and Knowledge.

    If any one of these is missing in your memory of an event, then you are dissociating. “Behavior” is the action associated with an event. For myself,

    in times of stress, I find myself putting my hand on the back of my neck. I would do this unknowingly, with no conscious memories or reasons. This is a

    behavior that originally I found meaningless. I became aware that when I did this, my mind would blank and I would lose all my thought processes
    Affect is the emotions one had in response to an event. An example of this happened to me recently when doing dishes. I became aware that putting my

    hands into the warm dishwater brought a feeling of terror to me. I had no idea why. I just had a sensation and an affect (emotion) but no knowledge.

    Sometimes I get knowledge of events from my past, but have absolutely no corresponding emotion or sensations to go with them. The affect (emotion) and

    sensations are walled off in a separate compartment. I can accept that this experience happened, but it certainly did not happen to “ME”, whoever “Me”

    might be. I can flip back and forth between feeling the emotion, or feeling the sensation, or having the knowledge, but I am unable to put them all

    together in one package and claim ownership. I have a simultaneous knowing and not knowing of disturbing information.
    Sometimes I dissociate sensation – I have the knowledge that I was sexually molested by my father. But I have had no physical sensations to go along with

    this – just the knowledge. I have a friend who experiences the opposite – sensation is the one element she has NOT dissociated. She has all the

    physical feelings of events but no knowledge of what the events are.
    Whether or not you define yourself as having Dissociative Identity Disorder, DIDNOS, or some other diagnosis, if you have experienced severe trauma and

    have not completely healed from it, you DO dissociate in a way which interferes with your ability to live your life the way you would choose. An

    alcoholic uses a chemical to dissociate; a good dissociative doesn’t need alcohol. Our minds can do it for free!
    Dissociative Identity Disorder used to be called Multiple Personality Disorder. Have you ever thought of the implications of that change? People

    do not really have a myriad of equal personalities when they split. They have a Core identity which is the original person born in the body. Through

    repeated trauma, if the defenses of numbing and dissociation have repeatedly been used, the authentic self, the Core, the identity may become out of reach

    and its existence even forgotten. But as long as the body lives, the Core is alive, although parts may be cut off from the Core, or may have been led to

    believe the Core died. The Core is the age of the body and usually goes by the birth name or nickname, although that is not always true.
    It took me a long while to accept the existence of a Core. I could not feel her, see her, or hear her inside. Some of my parts were convinced they had

    witnessed the Core dying. Be aware, this is never true – the Core CANNOT die, if the body does not die. The Core can experience near death, and be

    unconscious, but it is STILL THERE.
    I gradually came to accept the fact that I do have a Core, and now most parts of me believe this, although I still have parts that refuse to recognize this

    truth. I have been asked how the Core can be recognized. If you have watched a baby for a while, you will readily see the Core unless the baby has already

    experienced extreme trauma.
    Internal rules can point to the existence of the Core. If you cannot find your Core, ask yourself what rules all parts inside obey. A common one for

    survivors is “No outside children may be harmed”. Another principle of mine has been that no matter how much I don’t want to, I will stay alive for my

    children. These rules or principles that apply across the board obviously must originate from some central part of me. What is that central part? I have

    found it is invariably either the Core or protectors very close to the Core. Another way the Core can be recognized is by feedback from other people. I

    have 3 diverse jobs, calling for a variety of skills on my part. I can be very different in each of these jobs. Yet when people respond to me, I

    gradually realized they were all responding to some common characteristics in me that I had not ever been aware that I had! I evidently exhibit these

    characteristics no matter who I feel like inside.
    A way I recognize the ABSENCE of the Core is when I feel boredom. The only times I experience boredom are the times in which I am not Core present; the

    times I do not have my inner resources available. At these times, nothing holds my attention, nothing seems worthwhile, there is nothing I can latch

    onto. Nothing outside of myself will satisfy. I can be temporarily distracted by external things, but only when I find what is missing internally

    does my boredom really lift.
    Make no mistake, I AM addicted to dissociation. When I chose this topic, almost a year ago, I thought – with a full year to work on this, I can easily

    break this addiction. Well, it did not happen! Just as many people use substances to avoid facing difficulties, reaching for a substance to soften

    the edges of harsh reality so they can slip through life more smoothly, I reflexively go away inside when I brush up against something difficult, and am

    gone before I know it.
    The cause can be triggers when I am subconsciously reminded of something from my past, it can be difficult emotions, it can be boredom, it can be

    relationships I am not sure how to handle, it can be social situations – the causes seem endless. Any time I do not live in the present, in this moment in

    2008, at the current age my body is, I am dissociating to some degree. While working on this speech, I repeatedly would find myself lost. At first, my

    mind would just blank out when I sat down to write, even if, just a moment before, I had several paragraphs in my mind, ready to set into print. To get

    around this, I started jotting the ideas down on scraps of paper which I then taped to my computer to use next time I sat down to work on this. Then when

    my mind blanked, I could just work from the scraps. Once I had that strategy in place, my mind needed to come up with another way of preventing me from

    writing this speech. One afternoon I kept track of the many ways to dissociate parts inside tried when I sat down to work on this threatening

    topic. There were 13, one closely followed by another as soon as I refused to indulge in whichever one was trying to catch my attention. At first, they

    attempted to convince me working on this speech was boring, then suggested I procrastinate, followed by nausea, distraction, refusal to work, negative self

    name-calling, extreme sleepiness, anger, grief, a sense of entitlement, a severe headache, followed by exteme panic, then finally complete shutdown – a

    blankness inside – an inability to think in words or access any information at all.
    I have come to recognize when there are such extreme efforts by Protector parts inside, then I am on to something major – strong memories are close to

    the surface. They are still seeing something as dangerous and threatening to me, since they have not yet learned I am living in the year 2008.
    Let me share some personal history so you understand how and why I learned the skills of dissociation.
    When I was 2 and 3 years old, my father decided I would not be allowed to live in my body. He had taken some psychology classes as he studied for an

    advanced degree, and he believed in the popular theories that were then current. One was that anything that happened to a child before the age of 6

    was not remembered so it did not matter what you did to a child as long as it did not cause lasting physical harm. Another theory was that there is no core

    personality; a child is not born as a person. All personality traits were thought to be a result of reactions to outside influences. My father decided

    he could create whatever traits he wanted in me.
    Among other things, my father used electricity, increasing the voltage as I resisted him until unconsciousness would result. He was determined no mere

    child was going to resist him; I was determined I was going to remain true to myself. Eventually protector parts took over for me and sent me into

    unconsciousness so that my body could continue to live. Another favorite method was drowning by holding my face under water in a a bucket of water kept

    around for this purpose, At these times he would never tell me WHY he was doing this. I would beg him to tell me what he wanted from me. But since what he

    wanted was the complete annihilation of the ‘me’ that was present, there was no way I had the capability to comply. In later years he used a bench vise used to

    apply pressure to the skull, and many other methods. With the help of a programmer, by the age of 4 he had driven me out of my body and

    made it clear I was not ever to live in the body again. I lived over my left shoulder, and let other personalities take over the task of running the body

    and the life. I could still guide them, but it had to be at one step removed so that my own, original personality, the Core, did not show.
    Before I had learned this lesson, I would try to sneak back into the body and live directly. I remember being at the dinner table as a preschooler and

    being very very careful so my father would not know I had again snuck into the body. But whenever I would look up, I would see his eyes boring into me and

    realize that he knew what I had just done. I became convinced that he could mind read; there was nowhere inside my head where I was safe from his

    penetrating eyes and from his knowledge. It took me decades before I realized that I gave myself away precisely by being TOO careful, TOO quiet, TOO

    controlled.
    I learned my lesson well.
    When I was away from my father, I had various other atrocities visited upon me. I learned that if I had to live, life was more bearable if I did not

    participate and just allowed made up personalities to take care of daily business.
    Children of parents like mine are vulnerable to unethical groups outside of the family: those with perverted spiritual beliefs, those with belief in

    magic, the human potential movement, medical researchers, experimental programs, organized crime, paramilitary groups, government programs and

    various other unethical organizations. Many of these groups are looking for children who have the ability to dissociate. Some blackmail the parents -”Let

    us use your kid or we will expose you for what you are!” Others offer the parents whatever hook will pull them in – money, power, knowledge. Or even

    nothing at all. They can be very matter of fact – “this is what your child needs.” Parents may be told “This will make your child smarter, healthier,

    (fill in the blanks here).
    From my contact with other survivors of extreme trauma, one characteristic many of us share is a belief that most extreme trauma is caused by the same

    type of organization that caused our own trauma. That is an easy trap in which to fall, but in my experience and knowledge of others, it is not true.

    Unfortunately, there can be a wide variety of organizations behind the trauma. One way to identify the trauma source is to identify the belief

    system and world views associated with that particular area of trauma. There will be a cohesion in the beliefs of each organization. Identifying which

    type of group can make the healing process faster and easier. The researchers have no common belief system, they are exploring. They may believe they are

    serving science, but they do not recognize human beings – they see children as objects to be used for their purposes.
    The stage was set for me to become very proficient at dissociating. My favorite paraphernalia for my fix was books.
    When I was in elementary school my mother once commented that I used books the way an alcoholic uses drink. She was completely accurate. But neither of us

    questioned WHY I would need this addiction. It was just accepted as a matter of fact that I was flawed and weak and would attempt to escape living life

    whenever possible. I was seen as ‘defective’.
    Books are still a favorite way of feeding my dissociation addiction. As an alcoholic has bottles hidden all over the house, I have books. In drawers

    under my couch, double stacked in the numerous bookshelves around the house, stacked up in crawl spaces and out of the way cupboards where I move them

    when they start toppling off the shelves, piles of them on the floor by my bed. I have more books than I could possibly read if I read continuously for the rest

    of my life. Does that stop me from purchasing more? Of course not. One of my favorite activities is browsing at the library or a bookstore. What a rush

    when I find yet another book that I will be able to use to escape. I keep a spare couple of books under the seats and in the trunk of my car. I don’t

    leave the house with at least one book ready at hand.What would happen if there was an empty moment, and I did not have a book to

    whisk my mind away from actually living in the present moment? What would happen if I actually had to ‘be’ instead of dissociating???
    The only way I had ever learned to deal with difficulties was to dissociate. The idea of their being any other option was foreign to me. I even trained my

    children to deal with their difficult emotions by dissociating. When my daughter was very young and having trouble managing her emotions, I would tell

    her, “Go into the next room and do not come out until you have changed.” She was very obedient; she would leave the room in a tantrum state, but soon would

    emerge, smiling, pleasant, and happy. Any vestige of a problem was gone without a trace. I was so very proud of her!
    If you have dissociative parents, you also probably learned dissociation from them – both by being taught it directly, and by example. Parents who

    dissociate are unable to help a child go through their emotions. They are unable to help the child learn that an emotion is nothing to fear, but

    something that is very valuable and precious, helpful in living life. For myself, I sincerely believed that switching off an emotion was the best way to

    deal with it. I had never heard of the concept of self-soothing. Decades later, when a therapist introduced me to this idea, I still did not see any

    relevance for me. Sure, it was pleasant to do some so-called ’self-soothing ‘ activities, and I felt mildly better when I did them. But the concepts of

    staying with an emotion, sitting with it until it changes, and using a self soothing technique instead of switching, were all foreign to me. I was too

    terrified of emotions to ever do this. I was afraid of fear itself, and would go to immense means not to experience the emotion of fear, or any other

    emotion, without ever realizing that I was doing this. I had control of myself. I could handle anything.
    Let’s fast forward in time to my later adult years, after I found a competent therapist to help me sort through the mess that had been my life, and after I

    was able to leave a marriage that perpetuated what my father had set in place. I cut all ties with my relatives who had vested interests in keeping

    me from personal knowledge. I was careful with organized groups of people, and with individuals who might not be safe. I learned what to look for, how

    to tell whether or not something was safe, how to tell whether or not I was accessed. Eventually, I realized I was safe, my children were safe and well

    on their way to healing, we all had safeguards in place.
    I had no reason not to live in the present, I was relatively free from harm from external sources, so there was no longer a need to dissociate, so I was

    DONE with dissociation, right? I lived happily ever after, end of story?
    Obviously WRONG!
    Long ago, decades ago, I decided that life was not worth living – it was something to ‘get through’ as smoothly and mindlessly as possible until I

    could die. The rule had been to imperceptibly stay as non-present as possible, while going about the business of doing what I had to do

    to ’survive’, to pass as human. That was a rule I learned deep, deep down.
    Einstein said: “I must be willing to give up what I am in order to become what I will be.” That can be exceedingly difficult. When I embarked on this

    journey I had not realized that healing required CHANGE on my part. I wanted the constant pain and anguish to stop, but I didn’t want my actual self to be

    different. I did not want to have to uproot the very foundations of my beliefs and actions and metaphorically relearn how to walk. I wanted to be

    free of the continual anguish I experienced, the continual need to cover up my lapses due to dissociation; the continual sporadic loss of time, the hop

    scotching nature of my abilities – sometimes being able to do certain things; other times have no concept of, or even any desire to have certain abilities.

    I wanted relief of all my symptoms, but I did not really want to “heal”.
    A personal friend of mine is a member of Alcoholics Anonymous. He once told me that when a person is finally ready to start dealing with their addiction,

    they gradually realize that they then have to deal with what caused their addiction in the first place; what they had been unwilling/unable to face

    originally, what drove them to drink. Only now their problems were compounded by all the problems that alcoholism brings.
    Judy Murphy, who founded “Moms Off Meth” says, “The worst would pass in a few days. I’d feel good and I’d think, “I’ve got it down pat.” But then I’d look

    at my life and feel bad. That’s the real pain when you’re an addict. USING HURTS, BUT REALITY HURTS WORSE.”
    For myself, when not dissociating, I would look at my life and realize this is so very different than what I had envisioned. I do not have a birth family, I

    do not have in-laws, I do not have blood relatives, I do not have a life partner. I gave up an immense amount of myself to insure that I would have

    all these things, and when I stopped dissociating, I realized that not only did I have none of those people in my life, I was also missing major portions

    of myself. It has taken me along time to realize two things: 1. How can you lose what you never had? I never did have those things, only a pretense.

    And 2. I now have things that are far more important and valuable than those ever were in reality.
    But. I am still addicted. I know I would not have survived if I had not had the skill of dissociation. It served me quite well. It saved my life. Now I

    don’t want to rely on it; I don’t want to do it automatically
    I have identified three types of dissociation I struggle with:
    1. The first way is the simple practice of spacing out or shutting off. I use this for two different purposes:
    1. Avoidance when I am unwilling or unable to face things
    2. A learned way to be able to switch. There are many times when I cannot access the parts that have the information and skills I need in

    a situation. Throughout the decades I learned that a way to handle this was just to shut off completely inside, and sooner or later the information I

    needed would gradually seep to the surface or some other place in my mind where it would become accessible to me.
    2. A second way I dissociate is to switch to other parts inside.It has taken me time to be able to tell when I am not myself. I blend through

    most alter personalities, and it used to be easy to believe I was just being ‘me’. I’ve learned to be alert to various factors. One is what age I

    feel. Last year after the SMART conference, I was riding the shuttle to the airport, and for various reasons someone else in the shuttle, a woman in her

    30s or 40s, laughingly referred to me as ‘mother’. At the time, I had felt I was very present, content with being me, feeling safe. But I was startled

    with this reference and what I found in my mind was: “How can she address me as mother? She’s so much older than I am!” Ooops! Sure giveaway!

    Other ways I have found to know when I am not Core present are to feel what size the body seems, relative to other people or objects; Sometimes I look at

    a dog, and it feels as if the dog is shoulder height to me. Ooops. Not Core present! Other ways are to recognize what the emotional tone is and what the

    values are, what sort of things are important to me. How do I want to spend my time? A numbing activity such as computer solitaire? Oops. That is not a

    Core choice for me. So who is out and why?
    Other than age, other ways I have found to know when I am not Core present are to feel what size the body seems, relative to other people or objects; what

    the emotional tone is and what the values are, what sort of things are important to me. How do I want to spend my time? A numbing activity such as

    computer solitaire? Oops. That is not a Core choice for me. So who is out and why?
    3. The third way I dissociate is one that may be difficult to grasp if you don’t use it. If you do, you will definitely know what I am talking about. I

    will tell you that some people whom I have discussed this with have found this concept highly triggering.
    Within my first few months of therapy, I found myself talking to my therapist about a ‘construct’. He asked me what I meant by that term; at the time I had

    not a clue.
    I have since learned that I create a construct when I am functioning through something that is not an alter. I was always looking for a perfect ‘formula’

    that I could leave in place, and personally go away. Life was something to be endured, and gotten through as gracefully and safely as possible, while the

    real ‘me’ was tucked away somewhere inaccessible. When I am preparing to be in a situation which I may perceive as threatening, I automatically figure out

    what qualities would be appropriate and useful for that event; find parts inside that have those qualities; put them together and create an ‘artificial’

    persona to deal with the situation.
    An example: One time a friend and I planned to go away for a weekend, share a motel room, and do numerous activities together. I was terrified. I was

    unused to being social; I was unused to spending long stretches of time with another person without being able to escape and dissociate. I was afraid she

    would find me (fill in the blank here) unacceptable, stupid, weird, any number of things. My anxiety levels rose and rose. I found myself figuring out

    how ‘normal’ people would act in a situation like this, what kind of things would interest them, what kind of things they would talk about, what kind of

    values they would have. I figured out what the situation demanded so that I could pass as human. I found myself focusing entirely on my friend and what

    she might want to do. It was far too terrifying to have any ‘me’ present at all. I was still around, somewhere, but definitely not in my body. That

    would have been far too terrifying. From some remote area, I worked the body, instructing it what to say and do. A construct is not ‘me’ or an alter; it is

    lacking much depth of character, although there were always certain parameters set for what actions the character could do.
    Fortunately, by then I was far enough along in healing that I realized what I was doing and started laughing at myself. This was a friend who knew about my

    background, who was safe, who was very accepting of who I was. I ended up just ‘winging’ it; yes, there were some anxious moments, but I spent a lot of

    time just being ‘me’ and reacting spontaneously to whatever arose, and had a great time.
    I do want to say that I do not believe all dissociation is from addiction. If a person is still around perpetrators, dissociation may still be

    necessary. But once dissociation is learned as the major means to handle difficult emotions, a person will continue to use it automatically from then

    on, and it greatly lessens the quality of life.
    Having decided I wanted to do away with this addiction and the pain it causes me, I found specific strategies helpful, when I was not dissociating my

    decision to stop dissociating:I would like to share these with you.
    I would like to start with a quote I found: “No one healing intervention will enable a person to manifest the full scope of his or her wholeness. To

    maximally heal it is important not to limit ourselves to a single modality but to incorporate several healing practices that encompass body, mind, and

    spirit.”
    Many health care professionals believe it takes more than talk therapy to break through when there is severe trauma in the background. It takes

    physical actions, whatever form they may take. When we are faced with severe trauma, the fight or flight response gets activated. This shuts down the

    cortex; the part of our brain that can reason, plan and make sense of things. Pieces of the event, snapshot pictures, get recorded, but the meaning does

    not. They are memories that do not make sense. After the trauma, these unresolved emotions are frozen in the body. Think of what the physiological

    responses are to any emotion and what it means for these responses to be stopped before completion and remain in the body. There is an ‘act hunger’

    remaining – the body wants to move through and resolve these physiological processes. The body remembers even when the mind forgets. The body acts as

    our unconscious mind.
    In the wake of 9/11, thousands of people started running. And many ran until they had actually run through their shoe leather. I assumed they were running

    FROM, but according to Dr. Van der Kolk they were running TO. They had a deep desire to run for ‘home’, a place where they would be safe, where someone

    would take care of them and make things right. Whoever/whatever that place may be. But severe trauma survivors do not HAVE a home to run to, and talk

    therapy alone cannot create that home. Talk therapy can help survivors feel understood; it can help them make some sort of sense of what happened, but

    something more is needed to create a ‘home’ for us.
    Physical intervention is one area on which I chose to focus. I use several different modalities. With all of them, I have worked through extreme

    negative reactions. I quit living in my body decades ago. When the idea was first suggested to me early in therapy that it would be good to live in the

    body and be aware of it, I heard overwhelming screaming inside. At that time, external situations in my life were not safe and healthy enough to allow me

    the energy to pursue this.
    Once my external situation was safe, I tried different methods of body awareness, of working with the body. I think of Van der Kolk’s illustration

    of the people running for ‘home’ after 9/11 and I realize I am presently making my body a ‘home’; a safe place to inhabit. , I am beginning to create

    a ‘home’ of my body – something I have never before experienced.
    One area I chose to work on was breath. I was experiencing more and more oxygen shortage and was becoming increasingly desperate. I became aware that

    normally I breath in a very shallow manner, with a jerky rhythm. This is exceedingly common for people who have experienced trauma. What’s the first

    thing most people do when faced with danger? Hold the breath! This sets up an internal self-conflict. When I try to resist fear rather than sitting with

    the emotion and allowing it to be, I hold my breath and tighten my chest muscles to block the intense feelings. This results in anxiety, confusion and

    paralysis. It scatters my thoughts. When I use my breath to block these feelings, they become locked inside.
    How can you hope to heal when your brain is not getting the oxygen it needs to think clearly? How can you hope to be in control of your emotions without

    sufficient oxygen?
    I suggest you become aware of your normal breathing pattern. Unless you have worked with your breathing or learned how to be Core present, I am guessing

    that most survivors in this room have a typical unsteady, jerky shallow breathing pattern

    .

    When I first started doing breathing exercises, it was fairly common for my breathing to turn into sobbing. I go through periods when I stop doing the

    exercises. Until I notice that once again my normal breathing has become irregular, with many periods of stopped breath, and I am starting to miss

    oxygen. I have found that when I spend more time living in “Now”, in Core presence, rather than the past, my breathing evens out automatically, becoming

    slow and steady
    I was startled to realize that when I am not breathing shallowly, I feel have to consciously “suck” the breath in, working quite hard. In the back of my

    mind, I have been aware of this, and felt it was vaguely unfair that other people just ‘have’ oxygen, and it flows freely in and out of their body, while

    I have to labor so hard to pull it into my body.
    Tai chi has been another way for me to get in touch with my body. I have sporadically tried yoga but for me there are far too many similarities to

    instances of past abuse in my life. With tai chi I do not have to fight through so many ingrained responses before being able to experience the

    benefits.
    I will say that sporadically, when I have been practicing a lot of tai chi and it has been going very well for me, I will begin to find extreme rage coming

    to the fore. I find myself restraining myself from putting my fist through the wall. I have on occasion had to leave the room in the middle of a tai chi

    class rather than giving vent to yelling at the top of my voice.
    Through the practice of tai chi I have obtained much more body awareness, becoming aware and mindful of specific areas of my body, and slowly, slowly,

    I’m beginning to fight the reflex to scream whenever I am inhabiting the body. Just a week ago, when playing tai chi one morning, I suddenly became

    aware that my left arm was moving. Well, duh! How many months and years have I been doing tai chi and my left arm always moved in these patterns? But

    suddenly this was MY arm!
    If you have the extreme aversion to inhabiting your body that I have struggled with, I would suggest that when doing anything physical, avoid the temptation

    to distract yourself with music, MP3 players, reading a book while working on a treadmill, etc. Instead, let your mind roam around inside your body,

    feeling what the muscles feel like: the chest muscles, the arm muscles, the toes (I discovered mine were always clenched!), the breathing. Do this as

    long as you can tolerate it.
    Other physical interventions that have helped me are acupuncture and acupressure. Using acupuncture to treat PTSD is relatively new. I was

    fortunate to find a wonderful acupuncturist and I worked with this for some months. It was definitely effective. I immediately got very strong physical

    reactions. Many times I laid on the table with tears leaking down the side of my face, for no known reason. In the end, I decided not to pursue this

    further because of cost. Because I appreciated the helpfulness of acupuncture, I did some more research and found a well-written and researched

    book on acupressure which I have since been using and again, obtaining good results. There are specific target areas that work with trauma. This is a

    way of opening to the trauma, sitting with it and releasing it.
    Interestingly, my acupuncturist was quite intrigued by various ‘grooves’ in my scalp. He had run into this with nobody else. I took him a brain map showing

    where probes would be placed for certain medical procedures with the brain. He confirmed that the grooves followed the outlines on the map. He was also

    intrigued by the way the muscles in my scalp would change drastically from session to session – again, he had not found this in any other clients. I

    found this a validation of memories parts of me had previously shared, which much of me wanted to reject.
    In addition to the above, I found any strong physical exertion helpful. I will go through periods when I go to the Y and work out, driving myself

    relentlessly. After a period of feeling driven to doing this, ever increasing the amount of weights I used, and the amount of resistance on the machines, I

    began to tap into extreme rage, a rare emotion for me. The more I exert myself physically, the more I find myself in touch with my emotions. And the

    more I live in Now, in the Core, rather than the past.
    Cognitive intervention is another way of countering dissociation. I have found three areas that work well for me: EMDR work, Focusing, and general

    knowledge of how the brain and body work.
    EMDR stands for “Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing”. This can be done with a therapist moving their finger from side to side, having the eyes

    follow the finger, or devices of various complexities may be used. I found it most effective to work on this by myself, with a device I own, once I

    understood how to set up a protocol and use it. (Not to mention much less expensive!) If problems come up, I check them with my regular therapist, and

    I share my journaling with him so he knows in what areas I have been working.
    The first time I used EMDR I felt I was on a Magic Carpet that instantly transported me back in time to an age, place, and experience of which I had no

    knowledge. I was startled to hear myself speak of something that happened when I was a very young child, to experience the emotions I felt then, to

    describe the people around me and what they were doing. Using EMDR I was able to stay with this experience and process it without getting lost in it myself.
    The device I use has the sound move alternately from ear to ear, at a speed which I control. At the same time there are coordinated lights that move from

    left to right, and pulsars which I can hold in my hands. This brings together parts of my brain in ways which I find difficult to do unassisted. Long ago

    compartments were set up in my brain which keeps parts of me separate; EMDR helps me overcome those barriers.
    I prefer to use my device in a public setting such as a coffee shop or a library. The device is unobtrusive; most people assume it is some sort of MP3

    player. If I am in public, there is no danger of my getting overloaded or abreacting. I simply will not let that happen in public. In a private

    setting, I experience too much fear of getting lost without this safety net in place.
    Another method of cognitive intervention is Focusing, developed by Eugene Gendlin in the 1970s. I was going through my enormous library of books one

    day and found a cheap little paperback with this title, and an intriguing cover picture of wet stones. I started reading and it seemed amazingly

    simplistic. Yet when I tried it, it worked. I could actually feel things SHIFT inside as they became unstuck. It is almost a physical feeling. I have

    found this a very helpful gentle tool, easy to use. If you are interested, I recommend looking online. I believe you can learn how to use it just from the

    internet. Buying the inexpensive book can help out with more details.
    One question I have learned to ask which I find very helpful when stuck is, “What would it mean?” For example, When working on this speech, I kept

    getting stuck. When I would ask, “What would it mean to be able to write this?”, a felt sense of terror would pop up. When I sit with that sense, I

    find I am allowing too much of myself to be present in this speech. And I see my father’s piercing eyes once more looking at me. Enough to give anybody

    writer’s block!
    General Knowledge – I have found that the more knowledge I have, the easier I find it to do internal work. The kind of knowledge I look for

    includes: verification of my past, including as much knowledge as possible as to what was done to me, knowledge of different healing techniques, and

    knowledge of how the brain and body work..
    I recently discovered a fascinating book by Dr. Jill Bolte Taylor, “My Stroke of Insight”. Dr. Taylor is a brain scientist who had a stroke when she was 37

    years old, taking out a large area in the left side of her brain. Because of her background, she is able to describe in detail what it is like to have

    certain areas of the brain inaccessible. I was startled as I read the book to discover that what she was describing matches how I frequently experience my

    own brain. After I had found this book, by chance I ran into another survivor who had also read this book. She started sobbing as she said to me, “I never

    had the words before to describe what it felt like to live inside my brain!” Her relief at knowing she was not crazy with these flashbacks, was great.
    One fact I discovered was that when a person gets triggered, the physiology of the response lasts for 90 seconds. In those 90 seconds, the chemicals

    released surge through the body then are completely flushed out of the blood. After that, the automatic response is over. If I continue to experience

    unwanted emotions after that, it is because on some level I have bought into them rather than just letting the response dissipate.
    Since learning this fact, I have started timing myself. When I feel an unwanted emotion of unknown origin, I look at my watch, and allow the emotion

    to be without fighting it. When the 90 seconds have passed, I find I am done with it. I thank the parts inside for bringing it to my attention, and, since

    I desperately want to be whole and have my memories, I ask them to release the memories to me in a safe way now, since we are in the year 2008. And then I

    go about my business of living in the here and now.
    I have learned to listen to my body – I ask myself what it is feeling. Is there tightness anywhere? What is my breath doing? Is there pain anywhere?

    What is the general emotional tone? If there is something negative going on, I wait out the 90 seconds.
    If I get trapped in undesirable places inside my head, I have learned I need to break away from that. One thing that helps me is a Wish list of heart

    (Core) desires. I can tell if it is a true Core desire by the response I feel inside. If there is a leap of joy, it is true to my heart. If there is a

    sense of duty, drudgery and “should”, I do not put it on my list. I am slowly working on making these wishes reality.
    When I get caught in dissociation, reading through my Wish List helps bring back my Core. I may not be able to think; I may not be able to remember what

    the emotion of something feels like, but if it is on my Wish List, I know it is something important to my Core.
    Doing tai chi is on my Wish List. When I get lost inside, there may be an extreme aversion to doing tai chi. I try to remember what it feels like to

    enjoy it and I cannot. But more and more, I am able to remember that it IS important to me, somehow, somewhere inside, and that at my Core, I DO

    experience joy when practicing tai chi. I take this on faith, and frequently am able to persist, break through the negativity, and resume my practice. And

    yes, once I do that, the joy is there.
    One important section of my Wish List book includes what wishes I am currently fulfilling that in the past have been beyond my reach. When I am feeling

    depressed and hopeless, I find it immensely empowering to read through this -and realize the great progress I have made.
    Some people find affirmations helpful. For myself, they are less than – helpful – they become a false front put on over the Core. My mother was

    always quoting the Power of Positive Thinking, telling me to smile, whether or not I felt like it, that eventually I WILL feel like smiling. I should fake

    it until I make it. Used like this, the message to the child is to go into strong denial, forget your memories, pretend all is fine. When I use

    affirmations, rather than reminding myself of who I am, they become something to PRETEND to be, to fixate on until I no longer know who I am.
    Mindfulness, another way of saying “Live in the present moment” is another area I have found exceedingly helpful in living the kind of life I want. My

    dissociation is reflexive; before I am aware, I have gone off somewhere else. I am learning to be conscious of this when it first starts happening.
    Sometimes I am just plain stuck. I remember a time recently when I simply could not wash my dirty dishes. This has always been difficult for me, but at

    times it becomes impossible. (Along with many, many ,many other things!) When I try to ignore what is happening inside and do it anyway, it is like

    shoveling snow from sidewalks using a teaspoon. It can be done – but it is so very arduous and time consuming.
    A few months ago I decided to keep an open notebook handy when things are like this. I jotted down all my physical symptoms (shortness of breath, tense

    shoulders, tense muscles everywhere, etc.) and the emotional tone – great fear. I started washing dishes and when I could not continue, dried my hands

    and went back to my journal. The symptoms had moved, the fear was stronger. I kept going back and forth between the dishes and the journaling. Gradually

    I realized that putting my hands into the warm water was frightening me. As I looked at the water, I was not seeing warm dishwater; I was seeing a warm

    water tinged dark red. I was hearing my mother’s voice in my ears. Eventually I found myself journaling a specific memory. Once I saw WHY was so

    reluctant to do the dishes, I stopped the internal name calling (Lazy, stupid, no-good, etc.) and offered grace and comfort to the inside parts.
    I am building moments of “now-ness” into my present life. I pick moments in my daily life, such as when I sit down to a meal, when I get into my car, when

    I brush my teeth. I attach a hook to them “Be present NOW!” and am finding myself automatically becoming present. I become aware of what my eyes are

    seeing, my ears hearing, my body feeling. Frequently I experience terror at being present and aware; I look at my watch and wait the 90 seconds for the

    wave of emotions to pass.
    Being “me”, in the present moment, has also helped me with another misperception I have lived with most of my life. I found the concept that my

    life actually belongs to me very strange. My habitual way of thinking about myself was as a being created for the duties I must do, and that I had to

    shape myself and my life in order to do these duties as well as possible. I discovered that in reality it is exactly the opposite: the duties are there to

    help ME function as well as possible. What a novel concept! Sometimes it is difficult for me to get my mind around this.
    Community support is yet another area exceedingly important in breaking dissociative addiction.
    When I first gained memories, I went through the ‘tell-all’ stage, finding myself wanting to go up to even casual acquaintances and tell them all the

    horrific details of what I had just found were part of my history. Part of the motive during this stage was that I really did not believe these things

    myself, and if I could tell them to someone else and they believed them, perhaps I could also then accept them as truth. I needed to share them in

    order to admit to myself they were real. For me, this was a first step in ending denial.
    Another motive for wanting to tell everyone was the feeling that everybody has things like this in their past; they aren’t that big a deal. And even if

    someone has not experienced this particular type of abuse, they must have something similar. I wanted to compare, and I also wanted to know whether I

    should minimize all of this or whether it was worth expending energy on. At this stage I found it amazingly helpful when I would matter of factly share

    something with my therapist and he would express an emotional reaction to things I thought were no big deal.
    After that came the “keep-it-all-to-myself” stage. With this stage there was a strong feeling that nobody could possibly understand what I have

    experienced, so there is no point in saying anything. There was also an element of shame involved – the old mindset of “there must be something wrong

    with me, if I was treated like this and other people were not.”
    I was angry that people could not comprehend the magnitude of what I had experienced. I wanted to make other people hurt – but yet I did not want to

    do that at all! So my solution was to pretend I was a normal human being. When conversations turned to families, growing up, the past, school

    experiences (I could go on and on here with my list), I became expert at becoming silent, deflecting questions, getting the other person to talk about

    themselves, while I sat there, protecting myself from exposure with amazingly strong barriers.
    I have now passed through that stage, and do publicly acknowledge, where it is appropriate, that I have a past that is outside of the world view of most

    people. When I talk about it, I use words to which people can relate. I discuss PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder); this is something which most

    people now have at least a rudimentary understanding about. Frequently I do not go beyond that. If someone asks what caused it, I just say traumatic

    events as I was growing up. Once people know I have PTSD, it is not difficult for them to be understanding when something comes up that is difficult for me

    to handle smoothly. I do not talk about ‘multiple personality’, I talk about “part of me feels this, part of me experienced that”. I do not talk

    about ‘ritual abuse’; I say that there were groups of people who got caught up in mob hysteria and would do things that in normal everyday life they would

    not do.
    If you think about people who have had cancer or extreme medical conditions, many people who have not experienced it find it difficult to hear the

    details. But yet, when it is known someone has cancer, nearly everyone can be understanding and make the necessary allowances.
    By talking in a non sensational way about my experiences, I feel I am once more part of the human race – most people can now relate to me and less and

    less do I feel I have to remain silent and completely guarded. I needed to share to be able to admit to myself that yes, this is all me. I am not this

    separate part sitting over here that pretends to itself it is just like everyone else.
    “At present, I suspect I will be fighting this addiction for years to come, and that it will continue to take much mindfulness and awareness on my part,

    and continually working with the tools I have found that help me. I continue to find myself avoiding, reluctant to face things. I get lazy about using

    the tools that I know consistently work. I have parts inside whose purpose is to derail me, mistakenly thinking this is the best way to protect me. They

    take tools that have previously worked, twist them slightly, and take me off track, leading me further and further away from my core. Denial continually

    creeps up on me. Denial and unacceptance. “Of course those things could not have happened to me! Of course my life was not that bad!”

    When I get stuck and cannot work my way out, I am learning I need to ask for help. This is amazingly difficult for me. In the world I lived in for the

    first several years of life, asking for help was the one way to totally guarantee completely losing oneself. But I am learning. I rely on friends

    and my therapist. I have used online groups such as Neil’s pro survivor list. These are powerful in breaking the internalized messages from the past.
    A lot of addicts go to frequent 12 step programs, sometimes every day. Since I have not found a 12 step program for addicts of dissociation, I do things

    every day that bring me in touch with present day reality and keep my goals firmly in the forefront of my mind. I know better than to make a formula for

    doing these things; I keep it loose
    Do working these tools take up all of my time? No. I actually work at formal jobs around 50 to 60 hours a week. These tools give me the strength and

    energy to stay engaged with life, live in the present much of the time, and find it worthwhile.
    Like many addicts, my path is not smooth. Time and again, I fall back on my tried and true relief from pain and anguish – dissociation. Time and again I

    stop using my resources. And again, and again, and again, I remember this is not how I want to live my life; this is not living life. And again, I look at

    my list of resources and tools to help me. And I ask for help from those around me.
    My name is Joanne; I am a recovering dissociative.

    Thank you for listening and sharing this hour with me.

    Wired.com admission of Satanic ritual abuse & mind control

    ‘Manchurian candidates’ to gather in Connecticut

    July 14, 2008

    Sharon Weinberger/Wired.com Danger Room

    For some, the horrors of the CIA’s secret, Cold War-era mind control research has never really ended. Next month in Connecticut, self-described victims of MK ULTRA will attend “The Eleventh Annual Ritual Abuse, Secretive Organizations and Mind Control Conference.” There, attendees will discuss their memories of being unwitting participants in the CIA’s experiments, which often involved slipping LSD to ordinary people.

    Are all the people who attend the meeting really victims of MK ULTRA? No, as the organizer himself notes. Some are suffering from other, no doubt serious, mental issues. But as Jeff Stein elegantly points out in a piece for Congressional Quarterly, that’s not the point. There were very real victims of MK ULTRA, and the CIA’s decision to destroy most of the records means we will never have a final accounting. “CIA Director Richard M. Helms ordered the destruction of boxes upon boxes of documents, including the treatment records of unknown numbers of “patients” agency “doctors” experimented on in psychiatric hospitals (including a wing of Georgetown University Medical Center), and secret locations, including military bases,” Stein writes.

    The more contemporaneous issue is that the U.S. government is again being accused of using mind altering drugs. “Just as in the 1970s, however, as I wrote in April, evidence to the contrary is mounting,” Stein writes. “The Washington Post’s Joby Warrick also tracked down former prisoners at Guantanamo who said their minds were destabilized by repeated drug injections.”