Study: People drawn to positions of power share personality traits with serial killers, psychopaths

Oh-oh! Politicians share personality traits with serial killers: Study

6.15.09 / Andrew Malcolm / LA Times Top of the Ticket

Using his law enforcement experience and data drawn from the FBI’s behavioral analysis unit, Jim Kouri has collected a series of personality traits common to a couple of professions.

Prison Walls

Kouri, who’s a vice president of the National Assn. of Chiefs of Police, has assembled traits such as superficial charm, an exaggerated sense of self-worth, glibness, lying, lack of remorse and manipulation of others.

These traits, Kouri points out in his analysis, are common to psychopathic serial killers.

But — and here’s the part that may spark some controversy and defensive discussion — these traits are also common to American politicians. (Maybe you already suspected.)

Yup. Violent homicide aside, our elected officials often show many of the exact same character traits as criminal nut-jobs, who run from police but not for office.

Kouri notes that these criminals are psychologically capable of committing their dirty deeds free of any concern for social, moral or legal consequences and with absolutely no remorse.

“This allCapitol Hill Domeows them to do what they want, whenever they want,” he wrote. “Ironically, these same traits exist in men and women who are drawn to high-profile and powerful positions in society including political officeholders.”

Good grief! And we not only voted for these people, we’re paying their salaries and entrusting them to spend our national treasure in wise ways.

We don’t know Kouri that well. He may be trying to manipulate all of us with his glib provocative pronouncements. On the other hand …

He adds:

“While many political leaders will deny the assessment regarding their similarities with serial killers and other career criminals, it is part of a psychopathic profile that may be used in assessing the behaviors of many officials and lawmakers at all levels of government.”

New York baby death found not to be from “H1N1″, no evidence of any global outbreak

Swine flu did not kill baby Jonathan Zamora; real cause of death unknown

5.20.09 / Edgar Sandoval, Henrick Karoliszyn & Carrie Melago / New York Daily News

The baby boy who died less than an hour after being hospitalized with severe flulike symptoms Monday night was not infected with the swine flu, Health Department officials said Tuesday night.

Tests on nasal swabs taken from 16-month-old Jonathan Zamora at Elmhurst Hospital Center showed no signs of the H1N1 virus still spreading illness and death around the world.

But because a fatality was involved, “It is necessary to take extra steps to get definitive results,” the Health Department said in a statement.

“Tissue specimens taken on autopsy have been sent to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for further analysis,” with results expected later this week, the statement said.

The cause of death wasn’t immediately released.

The Health Department’s findings came as no surprise to Jonathan’s father, Zeferino, 30. “My son did not die of the flu,” he said in Spanish outside the family’s Corona home earlier in the day. “He did not have any other flu symptoms. The attending doctor told me this.”

He added that no one else in his family had serious symptoms.

Zamora, a dishwasher at a Brooklyn restaurant, said his son had been fine earlier in the day but then became “very weak.” Officials said the child’s fever soared to 105 degrees.

“When I went to work in the morning he was fine. When I got home from work at 8:30 p.m., he had a fever,” Zamora said. “I touched him and he felt really hot.

“He did not have any health problems. This just happened,” the father said.

Zamora said neither he nor Jonathan’s mother, Gloria Castillo, became ill. Officials said the boy’s 3-year-old sister, Michelle, and two cousins were treated at the hospital and released.

“People should not panic,” the heartbroken father said. “It’s not what people think.”

Elmhurst Hospital Center spokesman Dario Centorcelli said the child’s doctor would not have made a diagnosis Monday night.

“The doctor last night had no idea of what caused the death; that’s why the medical examiner took over the case,” he said.

The parents hope to send their son’s body back to Puebla, Mexico, for burial.

Queens Assistant Principal Mitchell Wiener became the city’s first swine flu death Sunday. A funeral service will take place this afternoon at Sinai Chapels in Fresh Meadows, Queens.cmelago@nydailynews.com

US to now talk it over with Iran on nuclear program

In Shift, U.S. To Engage In Iran Nuclear Talks

4.8.09 / AP

The Obama administration said Wednesday that it will participate directly in group talks with Iran over its suspect nuclear program, marking another significant shift from former President George W. Bush’s policy toward a nation he labeled a member of the “Axis of Evil.”

The State Department said the United States would be at the table “from now on” when senior diplomats from the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council and Germany meet with Iranian officials to discuss the nuclear issue. The Bush administration had generally shunned such meetings, although it attended one last year.

“We believe that pursuing very careful engagement on a range of issues that affect our interests and the interests of the world with Iran makes sense,” Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told reporters. “There is nothing more important than trying to convince Iran to cease its efforts to obtain a nuclear weapon.”

State Department spokesman Robert Wood said the decision was conveyed to representatives of Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia by third-ranking U.S. diplomat William Burns at a Wednesday meeting in London. That group, known as the “P5+1,” announced earlier that it would invite Iran to attend a new session aimed at breaking a deadlock in the talks.

“The U.S. remains committed to the P5+1 process; what is different is that the U.S. will join P5+1 discussions with Iran from now on,” Wood told reporters, adding that Washington was hopeful that Iran would attend.

“If Iran accepts, we hope this will be the occasion to seriously engage Iran on how to break the logjam of recent years and work in a cooperative manner to resolve the outstanding international concerns about its nuclear program,” he said. “Any breakthrough will be the result of the collective efforts of all the parties, including Iran.”

Wood said the administration wants a diplomatic resolution to the nuclear issue and believes that requires “a willingness to engage directly with each other on the basis of mutual respect and mutual interests.”

“We hope that the government of Iran chooses to reciprocate,” he added.

The invitation is to be sent to the Iranians by European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana. In a statement, the group said it welcomed the “new direction” of U.S. policy toward Iran. No time frame was given for a date of the meeting.

Prior to word from the State Department, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran’s hard-line president, said that his country welcomes talks with the United States should it prove to be “honest” in extending its hand toward Iran, one of the strongest signals yet that Tehran welcomes Obama’s calls for dialogue.

“The Iranian nation welcomes a hand extended to it should it really and truly be based on honesty, justice and respect,” Ahmadinejad said in a speech broadcast live on state television.

The United States and some of its allies accuse Iran of seeking to build a nuclear weapon, a claim that Iran denies. Tehran argues that it has the right under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty to develop reactor fuel using enrichment for civilian energy purposes.

Through the negotiations, the P5+1 group has offered Iran a package of incentives to stop enriching and reprocessing uranium. Tehran has thus far rebuffed the offer despite the fact that its refusal has led to the imposition of three rounds of economic, trade and financial sanctions by the U.N. Security Council.

Individual countries, led by the United States and members of the European Union, have also imposed their own sanctions on Iran.

The United States and Iran have not had diplomatic relations since the 1979 Islamic Revolution and subsequent hostage-taking at the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, and official exchanges between the two nations have largely been limited to talks over security in Iraq and the situation in Afghanistan.

The Bush administration had pursued a policy of isolating Iran and not attending the P5+1 group’s meetings with Iranian officials on the nuclear issue. In a brief break with that, however, the administration sent Burns, a career diplomat, to one such meeting in Geneva last July.

After that, then-Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Iran had not been serious at the meeting, and such contact ceased.

As a presidential candidate, Obama signaled a willingness to open direct talks with Iran, and Wednesday’s step is the latest in a series of moves that the administration has taken to reach out to Iran.

These initiatives have included inviting Tehran to an international meeting on Afghanistan late last month, at which U.S. officials in another break from Bush-era policy delivered a written message to Iranian diplomats politely asking for information about detained and missing Americans in the country.

Also last month, President Obama recorded a video addressed to the Iranian people, in which he said the U.S. is prepared to end years of strained relations if Tehran tones down its bellicose rhetoric.

Obama team preparing for talks with Netanyahu to start Palestinian state

Obama team readying for confrontation with Netanyahu

4.9.09 / Aluf Benn / Haaretz

In an unprecedented move, the Obama administration is readying for a possible confrontation with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu by briefing Democratic congressmen on the peace process and the positions of the new government in Israel regarding a two-state solution.

The Obama administration is expecting a clash with Netanyahu over his refusal to support the establishment of a Palestinian state alongside Israel.

In recent weeks, American officials have briefed senior Democratic congressmen and prepared the ground for the possibility of disagreements with Israel over the peace process, according to information recently received. The administration’s efforts are focused on President Barack Obama’s Democratic Party, which now holds a majority in both the Senate and the House of Representatives.

The preemptive briefing is meant to foil the possibility that Netanyahu may try to bypass the administration by rallying support in Congress.

The message that administration officials have relayed to the congressmen is that President Obama is committed to the security of Israel and intends to continue the military assistance agreement that was signed by his predecessor, George W. Bush.

However, Obama considers the two-state solution central to his Middle East policy, as he reiterated during a speech in Turkey on Monday, and he intends to ask that Netanyahu fulfill all the commitments made by previous governments in Israel: accepting the principle of a Palestinian state; freezing settlement activity; evacuating illegal outposts; and providing economic and security assistance to the Palestinian Authority.

Administration officials made it clear to congressmen that the Palestinians will also be required to fulfill their obligations in line with the road map and the Annapolis process.

According to the reports received in Israel, the U.S. administration is not concerned about recent statements by Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman calling for a rejection of the Annapolis process or overtures made by Netanyahu during the election campaign.

U.S. officials say they will wait and hear Netanyahu’s position from the prime minister himself when he meets Obama in Washington next month.

No hurry to play mediator

The Obama administration is also not opposed to the resumption of negotiations between Israel and Syria but will insist that the Syrian track not be used in Jerusalem as a way of evading obligations undertaken by Israel as part of the Annapolis process.

Obama is in no hurry to bring the U.S. in as lead mediator between Israel and Syria. American involvement, which both Israel and Syria consider essential for substantive progress, will remain conditional on progress in the dialogue between Washington and Damascus.

Regarding Iran, the Obama administration is preparing the ground for a policy distinguishing between Iran’s right to have nuclear technology, including uranium enrichment done under international supervision, and the actual building of a nuclear weapon.

Zio-Hawk Avigdor Lieberman facing corruption and bribery charges

Lieberman likely to be convicted: Police

4.5.09 / Press TV

Israeli investigators say a corruption probe about foreign minister is likely to convict him of money laundering, fraud and breach of trust.

The investigation into the crimes allegedly committed by the Yisrael Beiteinu leader Avigdor Lieberman is nearing an end, Haaretz on Saturday quoted Israeli police sources as saying.

The sources noted that the police could submit their recommendations on filing an indictment in the coming weeks.

Israeli investigators are collecting more testimony to charge him with bribery as well, according to the sources.

The remarks come after a team of the Israeli investigators questioned Lieberman for five hours on Friday. The Israeli foreign minister’s bank accounts have been scrutinized and he is asked to describe the origins of his money.

Lieberman was first questioned on the matter in April 2007.

Sources at Yisrael Beiteinu have declared that the party would not quit the government even if Lieberman is forced to withdraw from the governing coalition.

Iran welcomes US-backed plan for global nuclear fuel repository

Iran supports US-backed nuclear fuel bank idea

4.6.09 / Reuters

Iran welcomed today a proposal to set up a global nuclear fuel repository, part of a US-backed plan to put all uranium enrichment under strict international control.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, in Kazakhstan on a visit, said he supported a proposal to host the nuclear bank in the fellow Caspian nation, which is accessible from Iran by sea.

“We think that (Kazakh President) Nursultan Nazarbayev’s idea to host a nuclear fuel bank is a very good proposal,” he told reporters after talks with the Kazakh leader.

Iran’s support for the idea comes as US President Barack Obama pushes for a “new beginning” in bilateral ties, and could play a role in mending bridges after decades of mistrust.

Iran has said before that it would consider stopping sensitive uranium enrichment if guaranteed a supply of nuclear fuel from abroad. However, it has also frequently insisted on its right to master the complete nuclear fuel cycle, including enriching uranium, for peaceful purposes.

Enriched uranium can be used in a nuclear power plant or, if purified to a much higher degree, in an atomic bomb. Iran rejects accusations from the United States and some of its allies that it is trying to develop a bomb under cover of a civilian nuclear programme.

The global repository idea would allow countries to tap into its reserves to fuel their nuclear plants without having to develop their own enrichment capability.

Speaking in reaction to US proposals of closer relations, Mr Ahmadinejad welcomed “change and reform” but made it clear Tehran expected Washington to make the next move.

“We are waiting for this change,” he said. “We hope that his (Mr Obama’s) views are based on the necessity for reform and change of policy. We hope he can achieve that.”

The nuclear bank is due to be supervised by the International Atomic Energy Agency but its exact timing and cost remain unclear. Its final host is also yet to be decided.

Earlier today, Mr Nazarbayev said Kazakhstan, where the Soviet Union tested nuclear bombs, was ready to host such a bank on its territory, part of his plan to boost his oil-rich nation’s clout in regional diplomacy.

Kazakhstan, one of the world’s biggest uranium producers, inherited a stock of nuclear arms after the Soviet Union collapsed. It gave up its arsenal shortly afterwards, winning praise in the West.

Zionist group that planned to bomb Canadian university gave advice that led to George Galloway being banned from Canada

Terrorist organization that planned to bomb Concordia University advised Canadian government to ban MP George Galloway

Scott Weinstein / Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights News

An organization that planned to blow up Concordia University, and that the FBI, the U.S. State Department, and U.S. courts have branded a ‘terrorist organization’, has given advice to the Harper government that led Immigration Minister Jason Kenney to barring a British MP from Canada.

A Kenney spokesman said Kenney first heard about British MP George Galloway’s visit from a Jewish Defense League (JDL) March 16 letter.

The Jewish Defense League, is categorized by the FBI as a “right-wing Jewish terrorist group”, founded in 1968 by ultra Zionist Meir Kahane. Kanahe then founded the terrorist group Khach in Israel. JDL leader Meir Weinstein (no relation to the author) boasts of getting the Canadian government to ban Galloway.

Mr. Galloway, labeled a terrorist threat by the Conservative government, is freely touring the U.S. now. Galloway is scheduled to speak in four Canadian cities from March 30 to April 2 on “Resisting War from Gaza to Kandahar”. He plans to speak against the Conservative government’s war in Afghanistan and uncritical support for Israel, which is why his Canadian defenders – and even some opponents – feel he is banned from speaking here.

The JDL can now claim further success because Concordia University just forbade a planned Galloway live video feed into their auditorium, citing Canada’s banning his entry into the country.

The JDL’s well documented history of terrorism

It is impossible that the Harper government is unaware that the JDL’s terrorism designation given how earnestly Canada and the US share such information, and how public information of some of their dozens of domestic terror acts is. (See here)

The US State Department designated the JDL’s Israeli affiliates, Kach, founded by Kahane, and the Kahane Chai, named in honor of Kahane after his murder, as “foreign terrorist organizations” – a decision recently upheld by a US Appeals Court. The Israeli Cabinet declared them terrorist organizations in 1994.

Baruch Goldstein massacred 29 Palestinians praying in a mosque in Hebron. The Jewish Defense League’s states, “We view Dr. Goldstein as a martyr in Judaism’s protracted struggle against Arab terrorism. And we are not ashamed to say that Goldstein was a charter member of the Jewish Defense League”.

The JDL is still active with Hebron’s Jewish settlers, most visibly remarkable for its hate graffiti such as: “Arabs to the Gas Chambers”.  (See here)

In a 1986 study of domestic terrorism, the US Department of Energy concluded: “For more than a decade, the Jewish Defense League (JDL) has been one of the most active terrorist groups in the United States. Since 1968, JDL operations have killed 7 persons and wounded at least 22.”

Despite their terrorist designation, and the post 9-11 war on terror, JDL leaders, members and chapters still function unhindered by security agencies in North America. One can only attribute it to the similarity between the JDL’s ideology and our governments’ Middle East and Muslim policies.

In 2001, JDL leader, Canadian Irv Rubin and another member were convicted of planning a terror attack in California against an Arab American congressman and a mosque. Rubin was also accused of planning to bomb Concordia University. Both JDL members were murdered in prison, although authorities claim Rubin’s slashed neck and two-story fall was a suicide.

Rubin’s death appeared to be the end of the JDL in North America.

The JDL resurfaces in fertile Canada

Canadian Jewish critics of Israel have noted the Harper government’s numerous unholy alliances to contain opponents of its Middle East and Afghanistan policies. Some believe that the little known Canada-Israel Security Agreement maybe behind the Galloway ban. Certainly, the Conservatives have provided a political terrain that is now fertile for the JDL to operate.

It is contemptible that the Conservative government for “national security reasons” bans outspoken anti-war critic and Palestinian supporter British MP George Galloway while allowing a known terrorist organization a free pass to operate in Canada and advise their policies.

Given that Concordia University’s Security Department is run by a former RCMP officer, we should question their readiness to accept such a politicized chain of events leading to the University banning the Galloway video feed.

The recent past appears forgotten and forgiven for the JDL, which resurfaced in Toronto two years ago. Meir Weinstein answered the question by The Jewish Press if the JDL in Toronto adheres to the ideology of Meir Kahane?  “I will always be a loyal disciple of Rabbi Kahane. Our ideology is based on the Jewish Idea as taught by Rabbi Kahane.

Last year Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC) leader Bernie Farber’s opinion on the JDL was “they have the right to exist” as long as they behave. The Canadian Jewish News on March 20, 2009 wrote the ” CJC commends government for denying George Galloway entry to Canada”.

The Jewish B’nai Brith and the JDL both targeted the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation (OSSTF) in 2007 to prevent them from debating a motion critical of Israel. The JDL is now going after the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) for similar reasons. Liberal aide Warren Kinsella appeared last week at a meeting organized by the JDL as a surprise guest.

In last week’s interview on British Channel 4 TV with George Galloway, JDL leader Meir Weinstein threatened any Canadian who attended or supported Galloway’s presentation would be “monitored” by the Canadian government. (Video here)

Perhaps the Conservative government is testing whether Canadians still care about their rights, or Canada’s policies in Afghanistan and the Middle East. Canada sinks into infamy when its government labels its enemies terrorist, while coddling its allies who are real terrorists.

Cuban travel ban eased to allow Cuban-Americans unlimited visits to family members

Obama to ease Cuba travel ban

Americans will be able to visit, send money to relatives in communist island nation, U.S. officials say.

4.5.09 / Matthew Lee / AP

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration intends to allow Americans to visit relatives in Cuba and send money back to their families on the communist island nation, senior U.S. officials said Saturday.

President Barack Obama plans to announce the policy change before the Summit of the Americas April 17-19 in Trinidad and Tobago, according to the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the announcement had not been made.

Although some restrictions have been eased temporarily in legislation Obama signed last month, lifting the bans would meet a pledge he made during the presidential campaign and could signal a new openness with Cuba.

“The intent is to try to test the waters and see if we can get Cuba to move in another direction,” one official said. “One way of getting the regime to open up may be to let people travel, increase exchanges and get money flowing to the island.”

The official said there is no plan to lift the decades-old embargo on the island and that the move “is just the president fulfilling a campaign promise.”

As a candidate, Obama promised to allow unlimited family travel and remittances to Cuba. “It’s time to let Cuban-Americans see their mothers and fathers, their sisters and their brothers,” he said in a speech last May in Miami. “It’s time to let Cuban-American money make their families less dependent on the Castro regime.”

There are growing calls in Congress to repeal restrictions on Cuba.

Indiana Sen. Richard Lugar, the top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has proposed appointing a special envoy to look into reshaping the overall relationship. Officials said Saturday that Lugar’s idea would be considered.

On March 11, Obama signed legislation that rolled back rules imposed by the Bush administration that limited Cuban travel to just two weeks every three years by Americans and confined visits to immediate family members.

Now, Americans with relatives in Cuba can visit once a year, stay as long as they wish and spend up to $179 a day. Those changes, which affect an estimated 1.5 million Americans, remain in place until the current budget year ends on Sept. 30.

Violent G20 provocateurs run free, peaceful protesters restricted – Sumptin’s up!

Who Controls The Black Bloc Anarchists?

Government Decides Who Protests At G20: Violent anarchists allowed to smash up buildings despite announcing target in advance, yet anti-poverty group barred from protesting

4.2.09 / Paul Joseph Watson / Propaganda Matrix

The British authorities seemed to have little problem with allowing a group of violent black bloc anarchists smash up the RBS building while provoking police yesterday, despite the group announcing their target in advance, yet a legitimate anti-poverty organization has had its “accreditation” to protest at the G20 removed on the orders of Downing Street.

This once again underscores the completely undemocratic power of the government to decide who is allowed to protest against them and who is not. When you have to get permission from the government to exercise a God-given right, as in China or Russia, then we know we are already living in a police state. The freedom to protest is not one that has to be “accredited” by the state, a license to protest as it were, it is an innate human right.

Apparently, if you wear black hoods and scarves, smash up private property and provoke police, then that’s absolutely fine and you’ll be left largely untouched. But God forbid if you’re a middle of the road anti-poverty group that just wants to peaceably march down the street.

“An anti-poverty group expressed “outrage” after its accreditation to attend Thursday’s G20 summit was suddenly withdrawn on Wednesday,” reports the Telegraph.

“The World Development Movement said it had no idea why the decision was taken but claimed it was on the orders of 10 Downing Street.”

“The group, which was part of last weekend’s huge (and peaceful – ed) Put People First Alliance which held a rally in London, said the Foreign Office received a note from 10 Downing Street telling it to revoke the accreditation.”

Benedict Southworth, the group’s director, said that the decision was part of the government’s plan to “stage-manage events and prevent voices of dissent and disagreement being heard.”

The black bloc anarchist assault on the Royal Bank of Scotland building yesterday certainly had an air of being stage-managed. The target was announced in advance, the authorities knew that the building was a prime target, and yet it was the only one in the street not boarded up. A cafe across the street was boarded up and yet the RBS building was left completely vulnerable to attack.


Stage-managed? Press photographers outnumber anarchists as the RBS siege is perfectly “produced” for a live television audience.

Cue a relatively small gaggle of black-bloc anarchists, followed by an similarly sized press corps to photograph every angle of every smashed window, and you have the makings of a stage-managed event to instantly be consumed by the watching middle classes thus enlisting their support for a police state crackdown. In this instance, the police stood back and let them do pretty much whatever they liked, which is highly suspicious within itself, but the week is far from over and a wider crackdown could ensue now that public acquiescence has been garnered through repeated footage showing the hostility of the anarchists.

We’re not saying for a minute that every anarchist group is working at the behest of the authorities as provocateurs, nor that the majority are not legitimate protesters expressing their right to free speech, but as we have documented, this particular black bloc sect are at best completely infiltrated by provocateurs who can routinely be relied upon to provide the media with violent footage with which to demonize legitimate protesters at every major global summit stretching back nearly two decades.

To emphasize our point that a lot of these people are merely hired thugs, whenever someone asks them what they are actually proposing to replace the evils of capitalism, they have no idea, as the video below highlights.

Meanwhile, people who actually have a defined cause and merely want to exercise their right to free speech as a public platform to draw attention to the issue, and have already proven they are a peaceable group, are barred from doing so by the government removing their “accreditation” to protest.

Why are the authorities so keen on stifling peaceful protesters while giving free reign to people who dress up like terrorists, attack buildings and provoke cops? Whose interests do the violent actions of the black bloc benefit? The interests of the general public in using free speech as a means of political change? Or the interests of the authorities in providing the perfect pretext with which to crush and outlaw that free speech?

You can’t overthrow the entire system by smashing one bank and starting a bonfire. Real political change takes generations of struggle, decades of building respected educational platforms, and a gargantuan grass-roots movement focused on taking power on the local level and expanding upwards. Throwing a brick through a window isn’t going to achieve anything other than making the vast majority of the general public despise you even more, and support the very systems of power that you are supposedly opposing.

We have documented numerous different occasions where the leadership of the black bloc anarchists were actually working with the authorities to provide a pretext for a police state crackdown.

Following the SPP protests in Canada two years ago, Quebec provincial authorities were forced to admit that three rock-wielding black mask-wearing “anarchists” were in fact police infiltrators used to gather information on protesters.

Video shows two of the provocateurs pick up rocks and try to incite violence before they are outed as cops by legitimate demonstrators. The two thugs then tried to slip behind police lines before their fellow officers were forced to stage their arrest. Again, the fact that they were cops in disguise was later admitted by authorities. Watch the video.

Alex Jones’ film Police State 2: The Takeover exposed how the black bloc anarchists were completely infiltrated and provocateured by the authorities during the violent 1999 WTO protests in Seattle.

The authorities declared a state of emergency, imposed curfews and resorted to nothing short of police state tactics in response to a small minority of hostile black bloc hooligans. Police allowed the black bloc to run riot in downtown Seattle while they concentrated on preventing the movement of peaceful protestors. The film presents clear evidence that the black bloc anarchist group was actually controlled by the state and used to demonize peaceful protesters. Watch the video below.


At the WTO protests in Genoa 2001 a protestor was killed after being shot in the head and run over twice by a police vehicle. The Italian Carabinere also later beat on peaceful protestors as they slept, and even tortured some, at the Diaz School. It later emerged that the police fabricated evidence against the protesters, claiming they were anarchist rioters, to justify their actions. Some Carabiniere officials have since come forward to say they knew of infiltration of the so called black bloc anarchists, and that fellow officers acted as agent provocateurs.

At the Free Trade Area of Americas protests in Miami in late November 2003, more provocateuring was evident. The United Steelworkers of America calling for a congressional investigation, stated that the police intentionally caused violence and arrested and charged hundreds of peaceful protestors. The USWA suggested that billions of dollars supposedly slated for Iraq reconstruction funds are actually being used to subsidize “homeland repression” in America.

The leadership of the black bloc has been completely usurped by the authorities and anyone who still professes to be a member of the group is either supremely naive or completely stupid. To dress up like terrorists, all in black with ski masks and bandanas (like the police) immediately sends out a negative message to the watching public and demonizes legitimate protesters.

More violence is expected throughout the rest of the week in London and if the police are ordered to institute a brutal crackdown on peaceful demonstrators then we can thank the black bloc anarchists, both the provocateurs and the useful idiots who ape their violence, for providing them with the perfect pretext to do so.

New US Senate push for ousting Cuba travel ban and trade embargo

A push for easing limits on Cuba

Senate measure would eliminate travel ban; embargo under reexamination

3.30.09 / Shailagh Murray & Karen DeYoung / Washington Post

WASHINGTON – Roughly a year after Fidel Castro stepped aside and handed much of the responsibility for leading Cuba to his brother Raul, there is new momentum in Washington for eliminating the ban on most U.S. travel to the island nation and for reexamining the severe limitations on U.S.-Cuban economic exchanges.

At a Capitol Hill news conference scheduled for tomorrow, a wide array of senators and interest groups — including Senate Democratic Policy Committee Chairman Byron L. Dorgan (N.D.); Banking Committee Chairman Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.); Richard G. Lugar (Ind.), the top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee; the U.S. Chamber of Commerce; and Human Rights Watch — will rally around a potentially historic bill to lift the travel ban.

President Obama called repeatedly during the campaign last year for a “new strategy” toward Cuba, and this month he lifted severe Bush-era restrictions on travel and remittances to the island by Cuban Americans with relatives there, after the 2009 spending measure banned using taxpayer money to enforce them. The Treasury Department also said it would ease licensing requirements for trade-related travel by U.S. citizens.

Although the decision is not yet final, Obama is expected to further loosen remaining travel restrictions for all Americans by the time he goes to the April 17-19 Summit of the Americas in Trinidad and Tobago, senior administration officials said. Such restrictions were first imposed in 1961 and have been progressively tightened since then. Removing all sanctions requires congressional action, but one senior official said that Treasury has wide leeway to ease the licensing requirements that limit travel.

A bipartisan majority in Congress, including farm-state Republicans looking for new agricultural markets, has long advocated lifting the sanctions to some degree. Provisions to ease the restrictions on travel and agricultural sales were repeatedly attached to legislation passed during the Bush administration, only to be abandoned in closed-door reconciliation conferences as the threat of a presidential veto loomed.

The new bill was first proposed two years ago, dying in committee, but this time it has gained 18 co-sponsors, including eight Democratic committee chairmen. Meanwhile, new legislation was offered in the House last week to further loosen trade restrictions for agricultural products.

Cuban American vote
The handful of Cuban Americans in Congress, most of them Republicans, have long been in the vanguard that advocated stricter restrictions and opposed a new outreach toward Cuba. But none has been more stalwart than Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.).

The son of Cuban immigrants, Menendez has risked the goodwill of the White House and his standing within the party to press the continuation of sanctions and travel restrictions against Havana’s totalitarian regime. He riled many of his colleagues this month by blocking two of Obama’s science nominees and by holding up the 2009 spending measure to protest the Cuba provisions it included.

The bill to be unveiled tomorrow in the Senate goes well beyond the measure Menendez just protested by removing legal barriers to all travel to Cuba, as opposed to just family-related visits.

Lugar released a report in late February that calls for a dramatic overhaul of U.S.-Cuba policy. “Economic sanctions are a legitimate tool of U.S. foreign policy and they have sometimes achieved their aims, as in the case of apartheid in South Africa,” he wrote in a letter accompanying the report. “After 47 years, however, the unilateral embargo on Cuba has failed to achieve its stated purpose of ‘bringing democracy to the Cuban people,’ while it may have been used as a foil by the regime to demand further sacrifices from Cuba’s impoverished population.”

Defiant, public opposition
In a lengthy speech from the Senate floor this month, Menendez shot back at Lugar: “Over the years, millions of Europeans, Canadians, Mexicans, South and Central Americans, among others, have visited Cuba, invested in Cuba, spent billions of dollars, signed trade agreements and engaged politically. And what has been the result of all of that money and all of that engagement? The regime has not opened up; on the contrary, it has used resources to become more oppressive.”

Fellow Democrats were surprised by the force of his defiant, public opposition to a provision that enjoys broad support in the party. Menendez also serves as chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, a coveted leadership post that demands a degree of party loyalty.

Some liberal donors protested doing business with a man they thought was taking an outdated stance, and some of Menendez’s fellow senators questioned whether they had picked the wrong person for the DSCC job. Dodd, for instance, is a top GOP target in 2010. He has called U.S.-Cuba policy “an abject failure.” Some Democrats have wondered privately how hard Menendez would work to defend his colleague.

“Anyone who knows me knows my views are both heartfelt and principled,” Menendez responded. “It should be of no surprise to anyone that I have used political capital in my many years in the House and the Senate on this issue.”

Fighting for a ‘failed strategy’
Menendez said he would continue to use every available tool to preserve U.S. sanctions until political conditions change in Cuba, although he attributed much of his earlier ire to the fact that the provision had been inserted with no notice into an unrelated bill.

“If you want to change Cuba policy, fine, let’s duke it out,” Menendez said. “Let’s duke it out on the floor and let’s have our debate and let’s have our amendments. Let’s know who’s for democracy and human rights and who wants to sell their stuff no matter how many people are in prison. That’s fine. At least it will be an honest discussion.”

Menendez and other proponents of the current restrictions warn that free-flowing trade and tourism would only enrich the Castro regime and defuse tensions within the Cuban population — friction that is key, they argue, to fostering political change.

Dorgan, who is the lead author of the unrestricted travel measure, said Menendez and a small, bipartisan group of House hard-liners are fighting a losing battle. “It’s sort of all over but the shouting, whether our country should maintain this embargo,” Dorgan said.

Menendez “has a right to take a position and assert it very strongly,” Dorgan said. But, he added, “it’s pretty clear to everybody that this is a failed strategy and has been a failed strategy for a long time.”

White House stresses ‘transition’
Although Obama last year proposed a new direction with Cuba, he has yet to indicate he favors lifting all economic sanctions. In remarks before the Cuban American National Foundation in Miami last May, he asserted, “It’s time for more than tough talk that never yields results. It’s time for a new strategy. There are no better ambassadors for freedom than Cuban Americans. That’s why I will immediately allow unlimited family travel and remittances to the island.”

But on a separate CANF questionnaire, Obama wrote that, while U.S.-Cuba policy “has failed,” he would “maintain the embargo as an inducement for democratic change on the Island.”

At a warm-up summit to this week’s meeting of the Group of 20 major industrialized nations, Vice President Biden said in Chile this weekend that the United States had no plans to scrap the Cuban trade embargo. He said that the Obama administration thinks “Cuban people should determine their own fate and they should be able to live in freedom.” But he added that a “transition” was needed in U.S.-Cuba relations.

Menendez said he was open to a debate on Cuba, provided his colleagues refrain from sneaking language into unrelated bills. “A full and open discussion of the real situation in Cuba is timely,” he said on the Senate floor this month. “We should gather evidence, bring a wide range of voices to the table and make careful and thoughtful considerations of their implications.”